Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Emilian's Calls

Channel

Emilian's Calls

@Emilianscalls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,355subscribers

-98 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001821039874
TypeChannel
Username@Emilianscalls
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Emilianscalls

Growth

7,3557,4537,4047 August 2026 — 7,453 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,450 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,439 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,430 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,416 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,402 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,384 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,421 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,417 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,401 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,381 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,355 subscribers7 August 202610 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net -98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,340–7,468 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 09:157,355-26
5 Sept 2026, 09:577,381-20
1 Sept 2026, 11:557,401-16
29 Aug 2026, 01:087,417-4
26 Aug 2026, 03:267,421+37
23 Aug 2026, 05:377,384-18
19 Aug 2026, 18:547,402-14
16 Aug 2026, 19:077,416-14
13 Aug 2026, 08:047,430-9
10 Aug 2026, 11:187,439-11
7 Aug 2026, 12:067,450-3
7 Aug 2026, 06:317,453first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 7,355 subscribers
Avg views / post
776
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.836%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held56 (20 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total24,816
Reactions total201
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

346 reactions across 51 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11432.9%
💯7120.5%
5114.7%
😁4412.7%
🏆4011.6%
👍195.49%
😎72.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 346 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC467 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://x.com/Emilianthesect/status/2093282712593269194 Made a thread on $WTH and everything about it.

3

27 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC574 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

In case anyone has missed the conversation with MCG on X, you can watch the recording here : https://x.com/MCGlive/status/2093077605138522170 Great video to get familiar with the project.

💯5

27 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC590 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

WTH BUY 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 Buyer: 0x017e...E114 Bought: 241 WTH Spent: $3,887 Price: $16.48 Market cap: $3,459,979 Buy now | Chart

3

27 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC677 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

The god candle will be out of this world, hope people are ready.

9

27 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC678 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

$WTH ‘s chart is a work of art. Expecting a huge breakout into price discovery over the next few days.

😎6

26 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC742 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Plenty of huge things being cooked in the background for $WTH. By far one of the best applications of a v4 hook ever created. 0xb8Fa8010833463Aac5595b55B9045479239EfF79 Infinite scaling potential. Real revenue generation. All while solving one of the biggest problems in DeFi: extractive MEV bots. Got invited to participate in the MCG stream tomorrow and showcase the project at 16:30 UTC. See you there.

7👍1

25 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC742 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Hope you aped in any of the gazillion times i posted about $WTH There will be a lot of tears from the sidelined in the coming days.

11🏆2

24 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC860 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

3 million USD in arbitrage volume in such a short time frame since launch (less than 3 weeks) Sky is the limit as the scaling potential is basically limitless. $WTH is a giant in the making

💯5🏆1

24 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC796 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Jeets sell cheap, we buy it from them. Stayinyourlane.eth has been buying gigantic amounts since we launched. If you dont know who he is, you got your homework to do. $WTH to gazillions, expecting week to be HUGE

3💯3👍1

24 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC789 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

WTH BUY 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 Buyer: stayinyourlane.⁠eth Bought: 3,475 WTH Spent: $49,065 Price: $18.58 Market cap: $3,901,301 Buy now | Chart

💯51

23 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC898 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Discount wont last much longer, just saying. NFA

31

22 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC888 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Took a solid week for the $WTH chart to finally retrace and give people another chance to enter before the real parabolic moves begin. Already generated more than 2.5mill $ in arbitrage volume and that's just with few pools open on RH, once the tech goes live across all EVM chains, i expect the protocol to capture gigantic amount of fees. Undervalued as hell atm but not for much longer imo. 0xb8Fa8010833463Aac5595

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @Emilianscalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Emilian's Calls” (@Emilianscalls), 7,355 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Emilianscalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.