Channel
@Emilyteachme
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,694subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001607320649 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Emilyteachme |
| Created | Between 1 November 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Emilyteachme |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 1,694 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:42 | 1,692 | +15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 1,677 | +17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 1,660 | +14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 1,646 | +4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 1,642 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 1,638 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 1,649 | +19 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 1,630 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 1,646 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:20 | 1,652 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 1,653 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
221 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 89 | 40.3% | |
| custom 5328273261333584797 | 70 | 31.7% | |
| 💘 | 31 | 14.0% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 6.79% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 3.62% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.81% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.905% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.905% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что делают для помощи бездомным в Канаде? 🤝 Дорогие друзья, продолжая серию постов про бездомных людей в Канаде, хочу дополнить информацию о том, какие есть инициативы для помощи людям, оказавшимся в тяжелой финансовой ситуации Что предлагает государство? 🇨🇦 1⃣Это, конечно же, shelters. Вот рядом с таким shelter я лично жила в Калгари, он был недалеко от квартиры. Там люди могут переночевать, получить warm meal и …
❤19💘2
Дарим и получаем подарочки по-английски ⭐ Дорогие друзья, сегодня делюсь с вами супер-полезными выражениями на тему подарков! ⭐ Теперь вы узнаете, что можно сказать, вручая человеку подарок, и также как ответить на приятный сюрприз P.S пользуясь случаем, спешу напомнить, что я вас всех ценю и благодарю вас за внимание к каналу. Это и есть мой драгоценный подарок 🥹 А вы любите дарить подарки? Что принято дарить у …
💘10🔥8custom 53282732613335847977❤4
🦌Лесные зверушки –самые яркие wildlife encounters из моих походов в горы 🌸 Дорогие друзья, раз уж зашла речь о животных Канады, хочу поделиться своим большим счастьем и радостью, которые я привезла из Canadian Rockies В 2025 году я впервые посетила Rocky Mountains, о чём уже писала. В 2026-м отправлялась в путешествие снова и убедилась: каждый раз горы таят в себе что-то особенное Первый encounter случился прямо н…
❤16custom 532827326133358479716🔥3❤🔥2💘1😱1
Хвостатые, пушистые и пернатые обитатели Канады 🤩 Дорогие друзья, сегодня поделюсь базовыми словами, связанными с животными, которых можно встретить у нас в Канаде 🦌 Насчёт детёнышей, они называются по-разному. Например, детёныш семейства крупных кошачьих и медвежат будет cub. Детёныш оленя – fawn. Детёныш семейства собачьих – pup. Также pup – это детёныш морского котика. Да-да, у англоязычных людей морские котики …
custom 532827326133358479721❤17🔥4💘2
Бездомные в Канаде… или когда сердце разрывается 💔 Дорогие друзья, сегодня поговорим на тему, которая часто всплывает, когда речь заходит о крупных городах Канады. Сразу предупреждаю, пост будет тревожным, и если вы эмпат или просто не готовы к такому, прошу его пропустить. Речь пойдет о довольно тяжелой проблеме, которую нельзя описать одним постом, но я постараюсь рассказать вкратце. Важно также уточнить: я нико…
❤33💘10custom 53282732613335847976😢4
🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿 Дорогие мои друзья, сегодня хочу познакомить вас с одним дорогим мне человеком. 🌟🌟 🌟🌟Итак, встречайте Катюшу! Катя живёт в прекрасном Лимассоле, на Кипре и ведёт такой душевный блог, что каждый раз, когда я его читаю, мне кажется, будто я сижу рядом с ней за чашкой чая где-то у моря 🎞️ В своём блоге Катя делится favourite places в городе, красивыми фотографиями, а ещё рассказывает про очень важные и prac…
custom 532827326133358479720🥰8💘6😱1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @Emilyteachme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Emily’s life in Canada 🇨🇦” (@Emilyteachme), 1,694 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Emilyteachme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.