من آراء المهندسين في كورسات التصميم الانشائي وفق للكود الأمريكي والسعودي للاطلاع علي الكورسات https://ragabelmasry.com/all-courses/ للتواصل عبر الواتس آب https://wa.link/w1hd4a
❤1

Channel
@Engragabelmasry
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,767subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002150236497 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Engragabelmasry |
| Created | Between 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Engragabelmasry |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 7,767 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 7,768 | +8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 7,760 | -5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 7,765 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 7,767 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 7,763 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 7,762 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 7,759 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 7,758 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 7,756 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 7,755 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 7,755 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 26 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (26 May 2025 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 195 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
574 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 460 | 80.1% | |
| 👍 | 66 | 11.5% | |
| 🥰 | 23 | 4.01% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 1.57% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 1.05% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.697% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.523% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 0.523% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 574 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2025 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
من آراء المهندسين في كورسات التصميم الانشائي وفق للكود الأمريكي والسعودي للاطلاع علي الكورسات https://ragabelmasry.com/all-courses/ للتواصل عبر الواتس آب https://wa.link/w1hd4a
❤1
السلام عليكم ورحمه الله فية مهندس زميل عمل حاجة كويسة فالكتاب الخاص بدبلومة التصميم الانشائي بالكود المصري الي سبق نشرناها مجانا دلوقتي الفهرس دينامك تقدر تروح لاي شابتر بسهولة رابط تحميل الكتاب وملفات الدبلومة https://www.mediafire.com/folder/94ic7c1a6y5z1/Files+Of+Diploma رابط الدبلومة علي اليوتيوب https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXQMHcXatXVdnvk6AQbk8q7yhCSRWH3OP رابط الويب سايت الخاص بينا https://ragabe…
❤37
🎥 محاضرة جديدة على قناة يوتيوب تم نشر محاضرة مهمة تشرح بالتفصيل التحقق من عرض الشروخ (Crack Width Check) في العناصر الخرسانية، وذلك وفقًا لمتطلبات: الكود الأمريكي American Concrete Institute (ACI) والكود السعودي Saudi Building Code (SBC) 🔍 المحاضرة تجمع بين الشرح النظري والتطبيق العملي، مع توضيح أهم المعادلات والاعتبارات التصميمية لضمان تحقيق متطلبات الخدمة (Serviceability). المحاضره مكونه من حزئين رابط الجزء ال…
❤12👍1🥰1
هل برنامج ETAB بيصمم القطاع ك Doubly reinforced section اكتشفت من خلال المناقشة والمراجعة ان بعض المهندسين فاهمين ان الايتاب لا يستطيع تصميم القطاع ك Doubly reinforced section الصورة الموضحة رقم 2 بتوضح ان ان القطاع لما بقي UNSAFE الايتاب بشكل تلقائي صمم القطاع ك Double
❤21👍2👏1
بيدج الفيس بوك الجديدة https://www.facebook.com/ragabelmasry22
❤2
من الامور المهمة الي بناخد بالنا منها وقت المراجعة هي مقارنة ردود الافعال لجميع الحالات لكل الاعمدة بعد التصدير لتصميم الاساسات علي برنامج SAFE ومع الاسف بييجي يوميا مشاريع بيكون فيه اختلاف كبير وفية مهندس عشان يسيف اللبشة قلل دور علي الايتاب وبعدين يصدر ويصمم اللبشة 🙄
😁4❤2
عند استخدام برنامج ETABS لحساب أحمال WIND LOADS علي OPEN BUILDINGS نستخدم طريقه EXPOSURE FROM FRAME AND SHELL OBJECTS ويمكن اختيار include shell objects فقط لادخال أحمال الرياح علي SLABS ( ROOF ) أو استخدام include frame objects ( open structure ) لادخال أحمال الرياح علي FRAMES ( LINE OBJECTS ) أو يمكن تنشيط الاختيارين لادخال أحمال WIND LOADS علي FRAMES LINE OBJECTS AND SLABS ROOF في نفس الوقت 🙏 نلاحظ عن…
❤10🙏2
السلام عليكم ورحمة وبركاتة كل عام وانتم بخير 🐑 ان شاء الله متاح خصم ٤٠٪ علي الكورسات حتي يوم ٣١/٥ ودي هتكون الفرصه الاخيره للاشتراك بالأسعار القديمه وهيتم تغيير أسعار الكورسات الكورسات منقوله من خبره سنين في السوق الخليجي وان شاء الله تؤهلك تشتغل في اكبر الشركات الكورسات المتاحة 1️⃣ كورس التصميم اليدوي للمنشأت الخرسانية وفق للكود الامريكي والسعودي 2️⃣ كورس تصميم الفيلل والمساجد والمنشأت ذات البحور الواسعة وفق لل…
❤22
🎥 محاضرة جديدة على قناة اليوتيوب تم نشر محاضرة مهمة تشرح بالتفصيل التحقق من الإزاحات الجانبية للأبراج العالية تحت تأثير أحمال الرياح (Check Wind Drift for High-Rise Buildings) وذلك وفقًا لمتطلبات: الكود الأمريكي American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) والكود السعودي Saudi Building Code (SBC) 🔍 المحاضرة تتناول المفاهيم الأساسية للتحكم في الـ Drift، وحدود الإزاحات المسموح بها، بالإضافة إلى التطبيق العملي على برج …
❤21
🎥 تم رفع الجزء الثاني من محاضرة Check Crack Width في الجزء ده تم التطبيق العملي بالتفصيل على: ✅ مثال حمام سباحة Manual Design ✅ حائط ساند مكون من 3 طوابق تحت الأرض ✅ تطبيق وفحص باستخدام برامج مثل RCM 🔍 المحاضرة تركز على الجانب العملي وربط متطلبات الكود بالحالات الواقعية في المشاريع. 🚀 محاضرة مهمة لكل مهندس تصميم إنشائي يمكنكم الاطلاع علي المحاضرة من خلال الرابط https://youtu.be/edr5ksJRk18
❤16
🎥 محاضرة جديدة على قناة يوتيوب تم نشر محاضرة مهمة تشرح بالتفصيل التحقق من عرض الشروخ (Crack Width Check) في العناصر الخرسانية، وذلك وفقًا لمتطلبات: الكود الأمريكي American Concrete Institute (ACI) والكود السعودي Saudi Building Code (SBC) 🔍 المحاضرة تجمع بين الشرح النظري والتطبيق العملي، مع توضيح أهم المعادلات والاعتبارات التصميمية لضمان تحقيق متطلبات الخدمة (Serviceability). انتظروا الجزء الثاني الايام القادمة … …
❤22🔥1
يعني إيه Orthogonal Combinations؟ وليه مهمة في تصميم المنشآت ؟ ليه بنجمع الاتجاهين X و Y في الزلازل؟
❤14👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Engragabelmasry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة المهندس الانشائي رجب المصري 👷♂” (@Engragabelmasry), 7,767 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Engragabelmasry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.