Channel
@EpsteinUnsealed
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,849subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002398995155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EpsteinUnsealed |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EpsteinUnsealed |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 3,849 | +16 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 3,833 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 3,832 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 3,838 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 3,830 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 3,837 | +8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 3,829 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 3,835 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 3,832 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 3,835 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 3,835 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
💡💡💡 A newly released Senate report reveals that more than $1 billion in suspicious transactions linked to Jeffrey Epstein were processed by JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America. Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan and Bank of America allegedly helped enable convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein by delaying the screening and reporting of his financial transactions, according to a Senate Finance Committee report p…
Hey @grok Did Nick Fuentes ever say that Epstein was not a pedophile because the victims were around 13-14 years old? Start with 👍 or 🙅 @grok 👍 On his America First stream, Nick Fuentes stated “Jeff Epstein, not a pedophile” and “All of his victims, 14 to 17, that’s not pedophilia,” arguing the ages were past biological sexual maturity rather than prepubescent children. https://x.com/Parodyjeffx/status/2085710…
🔯 Juval Aviv is a former Mossad agent and assassin. Juval was the leader of a team that hunted down the Black September terrorists who murdered 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics. His story became the basis for the book 'Vengeance' and the Steven Spielberg film 'Munich'. Juval was also hired by Ghislaine Maxwell to investigate the death of her father Robert Maxwell. ["Max" Book Link] Juval and Danny …
Trump ruined his presidency with 3 main things. Epstein fumble/cover up The israel First Agenda The Iran War I think you’ve listed three things that are basically the same thing
Here. Let me explain Trump's presidency to you in 45 seconds. https://x.com/WearForbidden/status/2084677461007110308 🗂 @EpsteinUnsealed
JEFFREY EPSTEIN WAS FUNDING AI DECADES AGO — AND PEOPLE ARE FINALLY CONNECTING THE DOTS Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t just a blackmailer. Long before ChatGPT or any of today’s AI companies became famous, he was quietly funding the pioneers of artificial intelligence. In 2002, he gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to Marvin Minsky, one of the founding fathers of AI, during a ceremony on St. Thomas. He also funded Joi …
Any member of the Trump admin that wants to run for POTUS in 28 who has defended Trump’s war in Iran and not spoken out against it publicly, has stood with the admin on the coverup of the Epstein files, and refuses to publicly apologize to the American people for the creating more inflation and high gas prices with the Iran war, will not be trusted. 64% of Americans are against the Iran war, and it is a complete bet…
Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie Trump expands his base by welcoming Epstein’s lawyer Alan Dershowitz into MAGA. This should work out great for the midterms. 👇 ALAN DERSHOWITZ (@AlanDersh): ✔️ Epstein’s lawyer. ✔️ Jewish-American Zionist. ✔️ Epstein Island visitor. ✔️ Accused of rape by Epstein survivors. ✔️ Publicly argued that adults should be allowed to have sex with 14-year-old children. 👔 TRUMP: “Alan is…
https://mol.im/a/16030073
President Trump -- after purging Rep. Thomas Massie, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones from the GOP and "MAGA" -- on Tuesday welcomed in "the highly respected" Alan Dershowitz to the GOP. "The Highly Respected Alan Dershowitz has written a powerful new book, 'Why I quit the Dems and so should you! (confessions of a reluctant Republican*),'" Trump wrote on his cash grab site T…
MTG: "Trump told me that I deserve having my son kIlled." He told me directly, "It's your fault. You deserve it," for standing up Epstein's victims. https://x.com/ImBreckWorsham/status/2084815580960264373 🗂 @EpsteinUnsealed
💥💥💥 ‼️‼️‼️ BARI WEISS NOW AN INTRICATE PART OF THE EPSTEIN COVER UP: CBS apparently had a major Epstein story in the works detailing major corruption at the top of Wall Street banks and involving the Virgin Islands government Never made it to air under the new Bari Weiss/Ellison leadership. 👇 Deutsche Bank failed to promptly report to US authorities more than $250M in suspicious transactions tied to Jeffrey Epst…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @EpsteinUnsealed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@EpsteinUnsealed named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EpsteinUnsealed” (@EpsteinUnsealed), 3,849 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EpsteinUnsealed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.