5 measurements spanning 29 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 353–359 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 15:18
358
+1
20 Aug 2026, 22:42
357
+2
14 Aug 2026, 00:27
355
+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:17
354
no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:20
354
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
280 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
195
69.6%
🔥
23
8.21%
💔
18
6.43%
😭
17
6.07%
👎
14
5.00%
🤣
7
2.50%
👍
3
1.07%
😁
2
0.714%
💩
1
0.357%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 280 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EsiCodFanZ. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 January 2026 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤➖1️⃣
🔥 اولین رویداد رسمی چالش وارزون آغاز شد! 🔥
🎯 چالش وارزون - سلطان کنترل استیشن
به اولین و بزرگترین چالش وارزون مودن وارفر ۲۰۱۹ خوش آمدید!
فرصتی استثنایی برای اثبات قدرت خود در میدان نبرد و کسب جایزه ۱ میلیون تومانی!
📋 خلاصه چالش:
بازی به صورت سولو در مپ ریبرت آیلند، مود رسرژنس
ورود به کنترل استیشن و مبارزه با ۴۰ بات وتران
هر کس بیشترین کیل را ثبت کند، برنده است!
در صورت تغییر زون، به زندان (Prison Block) برو…
لانچر کادزامبی با 8 نسخه کالاف دیوتی در دسترس قرار گرفت
ویدئوی کامل آموزش نصب و نکات تکمیلی , تمام امکانات لانچر , برنامه های آینده
همه در یک ویدئو
https://www.aparat.com/v/fngitb5
ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ ما رو دنبال کنین👇
🚀 @CodZombieIR
📱 www.codzombie.ir
🟢 لانچر اختصاصی کادزامبی رسماً منتشر شد! 🎉
بالاخره بعد از مدتها انتظار، لانچر اختصاصی کادزامبی برای اجرای بازیهای سری Call of Duty در دسترس شما قرار گرفت! 🔥
🎮 چه بازیهایی در دسترس هستند؟
هماکنون با ۸ نسخه از محبوبترین بازیهای کالاف دیوتی وارد فاز بتا میشیم:
✅ Modern Warfare
✅ Modern Warfare (Offline)
✅ Modern Warfare III
✅ Vanguard
✅ World at War
✅ Black Ops
✅ Black Ops II
✅ Black Ops III
و نسخههای بیشتری بهز…
بات لابی واقعی در وارزون | نسخه اختصاصی COD Zombie Persian
برای اولین بار در COD Zombie Persian میتوانید وارزون را با باتها تجربه کنید.
این نسخه، یک نسخه اختصاصی و شخصیسازیشده است که از طریق لانچر COD Zombie Persian در دسترس قرار گرفته و امکان تجربه Warzone با Bot Lobby را فراهم میکند؛ مناسب برای تمرین، ساخت محتوا و لذت بردن از فضای MW2019.
ویژگیها:
Bot Lobby واقعی
تجربه نزدیک به MW2019
مناسب برای تمری…
لانچر کادزامبی , بررسی بخش مولتی پلیر MWIII و تست نسخه لن
توی این ویدئو در لانچر کادزامبی که به صورت آلفا در حال تست است , میتوانید MW3 رو تست لن کنید و چه به صورت لوکال و چه به صورت لن مجازی با دوستانتون از طریق لانچر بازی کنید.
تماشای ویدئو
ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ ما رو دنبال کنین👇
🚀 @CodZombieIR
📱 www.codzombie.ir
ویدئوی 1000 آپارات , تقدیم به رونمایی لانچر کاد زامبی ایران
ما هم پای این لانچر بودیم.
مبارک انجمن باشه.
کلی قراره باهاش حال کنین
ممنون از تیم برنامه نویسی انجمن
https://www.aparat.com/v/mdl20lu
🤯 این تازه شروع ماجراست 🚀
تابستان داغی در راه است 🫶🏻
ساعت 15:00 ویدئوی رونمایی در کانال آپارات
ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ-ـ ما رو دنبال کنین👇
🚀 @CodZombieIR
📱 www.codzombie.ir
زندگی عجیبه...
یه روز توی بازیها دنبال باز کردن مرحلههای جدیدی، یه روز میبینی خود زندگی برات مرحله جدیدی باز کرده.
۷ اردیبهشت ۱۴۰۵، دخترم «پریناز» به دنیا اومد و خانواده چهار نفره ما کاملتر شد. ❤️
حالا یاسینِ ۶ ساله، برادر بزرگ شده و من هم در ۳۵ سالگی، برای دومین بار شیرینی پدر شدن رو تجربه میکنم.
بین تمام بردها، باختها، ساعتهای بازی و روزهای پرمشغله زندگی، هیچ حسی با شنیدن صدای فرزندت قابل مقایسه نیست.
پ…
و لازم میدونم عذرخواهی کنم، بابت صحبت های احساسی ، گاهی اوقات توی شرایط حاد، مثل من که تو شرایط جنگی بچت بدنیا میاد، از استرس و به هم ریختگی ذهنی، شاید تندروی ها و صحبت های کردم که باعث تشویش بعضی ذهن ها شد.
❤️
بچه ها من یسری پست هایی که توی این مدت گذاشتم , و باعث به هم ریختگی شده رو پاک میکنم.
با احترام به همه
❤16👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EsiCodFanZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Namrd @namrdw · 77,291 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“• EsiCodFanZ” (@EsiCodFanZ), 358 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EsiCodFanZ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
