Channel
@Eugene_story
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
517subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003635992577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Eugene_story |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Eugene_story |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 517 | +4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 513 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 511 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 514 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 515 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 516 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 517 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 517 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
273 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 92 | 33.7% | |
| 😁 | 62 | 22.7% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 16.5% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 6.59% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 6.59% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 4.76% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 2.93% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 2.20% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 1.47% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 1.10% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.366% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.366% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.366% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.366% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 273 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Eugene's AI Stories pinned «⚡️ Free AI access worth grabbing right now I personally tested all the options below and already use them in my work on AI Market. The main one: Google AI Plus free for 12 months. It includes Gemini, NotebookLM, Flow, and 400 GB of cloud storage. The offer…»
⚡️ Free AI access worth grabbing right now I personally tested all the options below and already use them in my work on AI Market. The main one: Google AI Plus free for 12 months. It includes Gemini, NotebookLM, Flow, and 400 GB of cloud storage. The offer goes through Internshala and is officially aimed at students, but users report that it also works for some regular accounts. How to activate: - Register on Inte…
🔥9❤4👍3
Rare footage of a vibe coder's behavior after reaching his limits has leaked online
😁11
All my kids vibe coding to pay for my Claude subscription
😁19⚡1❤1❤🔥1👏1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣18💯2🔥1
My path in programming
😁31❤1🤓1
⚡️ Huihui released an uncensored Fable 5-based model In short: • fewer refusals than standard AI assistants • runs locally, so your prompts stay private • based on Gemma 4 12B with Fable 5-style reasoning • focused on coding and reasoning tasks • developers warn: no default safety guarantees This is an experimental uncensored model, not a polished consumer chatbot. Try it here: https://huggingface.co/huihui-ai/Hui…
👍1🤯1
The AI says we'll be ready to test the purchase within 12 hours
❤15
Mitja has announced significant progress on the Acki Nacki Virtual Machine (AVM), the core component that will enable smart contracts and decentralized applications to run on the network. What does this mean in practice? ✅ Phase one of the AVM has been completed. Starting Monday, integration with the blockchain node begins—a crucial step that connects the execution engine directly to the network. ✅ The AVM already…
❤26🔥6👏2👍1
This is not an official announcement but personal thoughts of @EugeneDAO for everyone who has put time, money, effort, and hope into Acki Nacki What this is about You have every right to ask about the bridge, delays, DEX.DO, UX, the economy, timelines, and promises. You have every right to be disappointed. AN do not want a community where people are afraid to ask uncomfortable questions. Honest questions deserve ho…
❤22💯16🙏6❤🔥3🤝3🗿1
It's been a while since I've updated, so here's a quick one - Last night, I finally managed to unravel the tangle of tasks that was hindering absolutely everything — the transition to the new architecture, the start of the public purchase test, and the final run for sales - Speaking of architecture, I mean I'm still writing code in the Codex, but I've directly integrated GLM 5.2 into its interface as a cheap labor …
🔥18❤7👏5
Lol, GPT reset the limits for the second time in 24 hours Thanks, I managed to spend ~15% on both accs
😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Eugene_story. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eugene's AI Stories” (@Eugene_story), 517 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Eugene_story.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.