Channel
@EvgeniyaLyubchenkoBlog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
571subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 19 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001935645091 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EvgeniyaLyubchenkoBlog |
| Description | Человек эпохи Возрождения, дипломат, искусствовед Мастер дешифровки символов и скрытых смыслов. Расшифровываю загадки в искусстве, архитектуре, истории и литературе. Помогаю увидеть мир. Присоединяйся |
| Created | 17 December 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 19 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EvgeniyaLyubchenkoBlog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 571 | no change |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:47 | 571 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,715 |
| Reactions total | 59 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
105 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 43 | 41.0% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 29.5% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 18.1% | |
| custom 5433787340642349926 | 8 | 7.62% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| custom 5208751889218298040 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.952% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мой читательский опыт и триумф: что я осилила этим летом Многие постят, что они едят. Я покажу, что читаю. И, честно говоря, сама обалдела от того, сколько книг сложила на полку этим летом. А сколько недочитанных ждут своей очереди! Что особенно хочется выделить: 1. «Имя розы» Умберто Эко — моё личное достижение Осилила только с шестого раза! Это была битва. Но теперь я знаю, как Эко строил роман и почему он осозна…
❤4🔥3👍2
Баттл: какая «Одиссея» вам ближе? Знаете, я тут наваяла сразу две статьи про Одиссею. Не специально — просто тема так затянула, что остановиться не могла 😅 И теперь мне интересно: какая из них вам ближе? 🤔 🔹 СТАТЬЯ №1: «Одиссея» за один вечер Если у вас нет времени читать 12 000 строк древнегреческого эпоса, но хочется понимать, о чём все вокруг говорят — это ваш вариант. Я сделала шпаргалку-подглядалку. Без скуки, …
❤4🔥4👍2
Posted without readable text
custom 54337873406423499265❤2👍2
Channel photo updated
Вопрос №5: Сколько времени Одиссей отсутствовал дома? (Просится шутка про отца, который ушел за хлебушком)
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍2❤1😁1custom 54337873406423499261
Posted without readable text
👍3
Posted without readable text
👍2🔥1
Posted without readable text
👍3
Posted without readable text
👍3
Слушайте, ну сколько можно делать вид, что вы читали «Одиссею»? 🤩 Давайте честно: все обсуждают, все цитируют, все кивают в компании, когда заходит речь о Гомере. Но признайтесь — многие так и не открыли эту поэму. Здесь 0% осуждения, 100% понимания А теперь представьте: вы на какой-то тусе, кто-то упоминает Одиссея и Пенелопу. Вместо того чтобы отмалчиваться в углу, вы вдруг выдаёте: «А вы знали, что автором могл…
❤6🔥5👍3
Сегодня 5 августа 2026 Сегодня 5 августа 2026 Сегодня… ✍️ Рей Бредбери передает всем нам свой привет в август 2026📖 Предлагаю погрузиться в мир, который представил Брэдбери в далеком 1950 году, и пока порадоваться простому
❤7👍3🔥3
⭐️Ну что, сколько правильных ответов?🌚 🔢〰️🔢? Тогда, скорее всего, вы уже не раз пересматривали «Меланхолию». 🔢〰️🔢? Вы хорошо помните фильм, но некоторые художественные цитаты могли ускользнуть. 🔢〰️🔢? Самое интересное только начинается. Давайте посмотрим на «Меланхолию» глазами искусствоведа — и вы увидите фильм совсем иначе.👁
❤3custom 54337873406423499262custom 52087518892182980401
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EvgeniyaLyubchenkoBlog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вопрос №5: Сколько времени Одиссей отсутствовал дома? (Просится шутка про отца, который ушел за хлебушком)
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гения Любченко” (@EvgeniyaLyubchenkoBlog), 571 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EvgeniyaLyubchenkoBlog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.