Channel
@Exhle
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001620602908 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Exhle |
| Created | 11 December 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Exhle |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 19 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 19 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ As equivalent in the tribunal and scuffle tussle, the ultimatum and eagerness, the monadnock and excavation, the solicitous and lenient placed upon the backs of cadre lads. A noteworthy impresario is incited not by competency but by leniency. Therefore she can do exploits in aggregate but make one self a boon pal to those whom she bide. Unequivocally venerated, and favored for benign. Maintains an indulgent sculpte…
ㅤ On leadership referring to yet another frequent beseech targeting self-doubts in curiosity. Hitting those marginalized with a full-on bang in the sticks that hold many jurisdictions. Allocated in uncharted scenarios harvested a way better perspective than your own etiquette. Getting down to macrocosm for more consciousness shall he be named Earle O'Connor. ㅤ
ㅤ Vocally strung within jottings that cause a strike-up demand. Just like consortium progressive individuality being fascinated isn't something to called out about. Mistakenly be the happiest day but out-of-pocket tunes made it less breathtaking with all the fakes. Skilled but kept getting killed on how to disseminate the keyboards. Get denouement and don't second handedly make it, Elekai Duchlen.ㅤ ㅤ
ㅤ Bewildered by the gauze withering his own philosophy between knowledge and how cords could produce excogitative innuendo. Must be upsetting and quite unsettling backing up your expectations but you know that ain't a milestone. Unfavorable than before yet still confused on how a Happy Birthday would sound. In durability a simple 1, 2, 3 shouldn't make you awed in your worst day siding on, Edbert Duarte. ㅤ
ㅤ Synthetizer for the cognizance on how a finesse do prove a crux. Within cavernous fathomless notion that symbolises disquietude, obligation and replevy quietus all the way? Sure that is messed up vast time. Course the solitary colour ain't gonna make it up to you, by means nil will change in this era. Get it right nor zilch right will erratic facts over a snippet of card for you preeminent day ever on the notable s…
ㅤ Felt withal than equitable lucid obligation but finer as a dignified metier. Scrawl down more-or-less ligature that got twisted in the still talk of electrician. Disembogue the vanquish as now is the time for another evolution in that time of yearly edification. Some say put one the basics baking off all the quintessential to the fuming kinsfolk within misanthropist skeptic. Endowment adjacent for the subjugate out…
ㅤ Ain't getting moored up instead copious to get hooked furthermore right on this party tonight. Ablaze mishaps in a jiffy when it starts to blow any of your engrossment. Oh? It must be doleful seeing those screens split up in serenity. Interestingly enough how about bashing this erstwhile and for all. Let's get outre on the beat as a little bass wouldn't hurt any conjecture. Endlessly getting a sterling smite but st…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Exhle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,144,468 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Exhle named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Exuberant Huddle. #D-Day” (@Exhle), 19 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Exhle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.