6:57 Oct 13 ❣️

Channel
ً
@Exi2r
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
350subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 5 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001890351585 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Exi2r |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Exi2r |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 02:48 | 350 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:51 | 354 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 356 | -2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 08:15 | 358 | +1 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 10:39 | 357 | -1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 14:22 | 358 | no change |
| 5 Oct 2026, 13:47 | 358 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
33 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 12 | 36.4% | |
| custom 5258200625086218259 | 8 | 24.2% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 15.2% | |
| custom 5233380292550476580 | 4 | 12.1% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 9.09% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 3.03% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2024 to 13 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
لماذا نخاف من الراحة أحياناً؟ الراحة شيء نحتاجه ، لكن كثِير منّا لما يلاقي نفسه مرتاح فجأه يبدأ يحس بشيء غريب ، توتُر ، قلق ، أو حتى إحساس بالذنب! كأن الراحة صارت شيء ما نستحِقه أو إنها علامة إننا "مُقصرين"أو "متكاسلين" بس الحقِيقه؟ الخوف من الراحة غالباً جاي من ترِبية أو بيئة تعودنا فيها إن ( الإنجاز=قيمة الإنسان )فلو ما كنت مشغول ، مضغُوط ، أو تعبان تحس إنك بلا قيمة ، بعضنا يخاف يرتاح لأنه يخاف يسمع صوته الداخلي ي…
👍1
صباح الخير يارِفاق🤍! اختياركم لموضُوع “لماذا نخاف من الراحة أحياناً؟” يدُل على وعِي داخلي عمِيق ، وكأن في داخل كُل شخص منكُم تساؤل ما بين الحنين للطمأنينة والخوف منها ، كأننا اعتدنا الركض حتى صار الجلُوس يُربكنا ، والهدوء يُقلقنا أكثر مما يُريحنا هذا الاختيار بحد ذاته اعتراف صادق بأننا نحتاج نعيد فهم علاقتنا بالراحة ، مو كضعُف بل كحق
👍1
بين موضُوعين يتشابهان في العمق ويختلفان في الزاوية ، أيّ الموضوعين يُلامس تفكيركم أكثر؟ وأيهما تودّون أن نتحدث عنه سوياً؟
- الفرق بين الوَنس الحقيقي والتعوّد؟63%
- لماذا نخاف من الراحة أحياناً38%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
أحياناً لا نِغيب لأننا نُريد الغِياب ، بل لأننا ننشغل بالحياه وتُمرّ بِنا لحظات نعِيشها أكثر مما ندوّنها ، مرّ وقت طوِيل ولم أكتب ، لا لأن المشاعِر غابت ، بل لأنها كانت كثِيره ومُزدحمه ولم أجد لها كلِمات خِلال الأيام الماضِيه حصلت أُمور جمِيله ، ضحكت ، شعرت بالإمتنان ، تأملت ، وتمنّيت لو أننِي التقطت تِلك اللحظات بكِلمه ، بصوت ، بجُمله تحفظها الذاكِره ، لكننِي نسِيت ونسِيت أن الإنسان حين يكُون سعِيداً لا يُفكر بالكِت…
❤4💘2
مرّت إثنان وخمسُون يوماً مُنذ إن غِبت عن هذه المساحة التِي كانت مَلاذاً لي ، مُتنفستاً لما لا يُقال وجهًا لوجه ، اشتقت جِداً للكِتابة ، اشتقت أن أدوّن مشاعِري كما كُنت ، أن أُمسك بالقلم لا لأشرح بَل لأشعُر ، انشغلتُ عن القناة ، لكنِي لم أنشِغل عنها فقط ، بل انشغلت عن نفسِي ، صار التعبِير داخلِي مُزدحماً ، وصار قلبِي يُفيض بأشياء جميلة ، ولم أكتب عنها وتذكّرت: الإنِسان كثِيراً ما يُنسى أن يُدّون مشاعِره في اللحظات …
💘2👍1😢1
أحب ورد الزنبق جداً أحس كانه أنا يشبهني بكل تفاصِيله، بجمال لونه وبراءة عِطره تحمل معاني الحُب وهو ورمزاً للصفاء والنقاء فكُلما نظرت إليه تذكرت حساسِيتي، ورقِتي، شكلت مع الزنبق تكاملاً جمِيلاً .
وجدتُ نفسي بالنهاية بين الكُتب والأشعار وحياتي في السطور والكلمات وجدتُ نفسي اقرأ عند التشتّت والضياع ابحث عن ما أريد في المكتبات فربما لن تُعطينا الحياة كما يُصفّ الكتاب
💘1
بسم الله على قلُوبنا حتى تهدأ ، إنما هي دُنيا والمسَتراح في الجنة
❤1
File, posted without a caption
مِثل مَنزل عائِلة سَعِيدة ، قلبُها .
custom 52333802925504765804💘1
رغم إني شخص يِتفنن بالرُدود ويهِيم باللُغه، إلا إني أحُب الأشياء المحسُوسة وتستفزنِي كثرة الكلمات وهدر الوعُود ، ما أحُب أسمع بس أحُب أشوف لان الكلام سهل والأفعال تؤكد صدق المحَبة .
💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Exi2r. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بين موضُوعين يتشابهان في العمق ويختلفان في الزاوية ، أيّ الموضوعين يُلامس تفكيركم أكثر؟ وأيهما تودّون أن نتحدث عنه سوياً؟
- الفرق بين الوَنس الحقيقي والتعوّد؟63%
- لماذا نخاف من الراحة أحياناً38%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2024 to 13 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@English_Ahlam123 · 18,628
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 5 October 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ً” (@Exi2r), 350 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Exi2r.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.