Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ExploitQuest

Channel

ExploitQuest

@ExploitQuest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

7,005subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001941018014
TypeChannel
Username@ExploitQuest
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ExploitQuest

Growth

6,9767,0066,9917 August 2026 — 6,990 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,990 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,988 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,978 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,976 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,001 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,005 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,006 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,005 subscribers7,0057 August 202626 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,972–7,011 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 19:237,005-1
23 Aug 2026, 21:097,006+1
20 Aug 2026, 14:447,005+4
17 Aug 2026, 10:077,001+25
13 Aug 2026, 18:146,976-2
11 Aug 2026, 03:346,978-10
8 Aug 2026, 07:506,988-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:316,990no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:256,990first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 14 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

192 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13771.4%
🔥2312.0%
🥰126.25%
👍94.69%
🤣52.60%
😁31.56%
👏21.04%
😢10.521%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2025 to 13 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Oct 2025, 01:00 UTC≈4,240 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Zero-Day Vulnerability CVE-2025-31324 in SAP NetWeaver Platform: A Critical Analysis 🔓💥 The CVE-2025-31324 vulnerability in the SAP NetWeaver platform is a critical zero-day vulnerability that allows for unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). It is exploited by targeting a weakness in the Metadata Uploader feature of the Visual Composer component. 🎯 1. What is SAP NetWeaver? 🤔 The SAP NetWeaver platform is

10

13 Oct 2025, 01:00 UTC≈5,740 views29 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Wide Spread: There are over 1200 SAP NetWeaver systems exposed to the internet worldwide that are at risk. ✔️ Exploitation Examples: 🔘Uploading a malicious Web Shell to the folder j2ee/cluster/apps/sap.com/irj/servlet_jsp/irj/root/ and then accessing it to execute commands via GET requests. 🔘Stealing sensitive customer or financial data. 🔘Disrupting business activities. Lateral movement within the network and

29

15 Jul 2025, 01:05 UTC≈6,030 views31 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🔍 Recon Command for Bug Bounty Hunters This command extracts all JavaScript files from a given target using getJS, then downloads and scans them for sensitive keywords such as apikey, token, or secret. 🎯 Why it's useful in Bug Bounty: JavaScript files often contain hidden endpoints, API keys, tokens, or sensitive configuration data. This command helps bug bounty hunters automate the discovery of potential security

31

29 Jun 2025, 20:02 UTC≈5,740 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026

You can try the bot now. Note: Model Chat GPT is not working now. 🤖 @DarkHunterAIbot

6

21 Jun 2025, 19:31 UTC≈6,130 views26 reactionsread 20 August 2026

❖ API Authentication Bypass Let's assume we have a vulnerable API endpoint: https://example.com/api/v1/users The API uses JSON Web Tokens (JWT) for authentication. We can use a tool like Burp Suite to intercept and manipulate the JWT token. Step 1: Intercept JWT Token Using Burp Suite, intercept the login request and capture the JWT token: GET /api/v1/login HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com Content-Type: application/jso

15🔥5🥰5👏1

19 Jun 2025, 20:18 UTC≈4,270 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

lol What is this speed? 😂👍

10🥰2

19 Jun 2025, 19:25 UTC≈3,910 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🧑‍🚀 Using wget for Bug Bounty Recon 📥 Download a full offline copy of a target website with this powerful one-liner: wget --mirror --convert-links --adjust-extension --page-requisites --no-parent http://target.com 🧠 Why it's useful for Bug Bounty hunters: Analyze JavaScript files for hidden secrets, tokens, or API endpoints 🔒 Discover hidden or forgotten pages like /admin, /test, etc. 🕵️ Search HTML comments f

🔥42🥰2

19 Jun 2025, 02:58 UTC≈3,520 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Here’s a powerful list of 💻 SQLMap preconfigured profiles you can use for stealthy SQL injection, especially when dealing with WAFs, rate-limits, or intrusion detection systems (IDS/IPS). These profiles combine SQLMap's most effective flags for stealth, evasion, and precision targeting. ✅ 1. Stealth Mode (WAF Bypass + Delay) sqlmap -u "http://target.com/page.php?id=1" \ --random-agent \ --tamper=space2comment,be

11🔥4🥰1

18 Jun 2025, 08:59 UTC≈2,840 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🕷️ Mastering SSRF: A Step-by-Step Guide to Finding and Exploiting Server-Side Request Forgery Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) is a powerful vulnerability that occurs when a server fetches external resources based on user input. If exploited, it can lead to data leakage, access to internal systems, or even full infrastructure compromise. Here’s a step-by-step guide to discovering and exploiting SSRF vulnerabilit

🔥54👍1🥰1

16 Jun 2025, 07:38 UTC≈3,620 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026

💻 Advanced Guide to SQL Injection in APIs and JSON Endpoints 🧠 Introduction In the modern web, APIs are everywhere — powering everything from web apps and mobile apps to IoT devices. However, developers often make the same classic mistakes when handling user input, especially in JSON-based RESTful APIs. SQL Injection (SQLi), a well-known vulnerability, is still relevant and can exist within APIs if input validation

9👍2🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ExploitQuest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ExploitQuest” (@ExploitQuest), 7,005 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ExploitQuest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.