10 measurements spanning 26 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,378–5,417 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 20:39
5,412
+5
30 Aug 2026, 18:03
5,407
+9
27 Aug 2026, 16:25
5,398
+6
24 Aug 2026, 21:27
5,392
+4
21 Aug 2026, 03:54
5,388
+6
18 Aug 2026, 01:26
5,382
-6
15 Aug 2026, 09:16
5,388
-2
12 Aug 2026, 03:16
5,390
+6
8 Aug 2026, 18:04
5,384
+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:19
5,383
first reading
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 5,412 subscribers
Avg views / post
885
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
42 (3 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
6,195
Reactions total
676
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
4,002 reactions across 42 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💘
2,235
55.8%
😭
1,218
30.4%
😢
360
9.00%
⚡
189
4.72%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,002 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 42 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FATIMAHAMADMAD. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
مهيبٌ منظر الإنسان حين يحب، تجده راسخًا في مشيته نحو بلوغه مناه كأنه لم يقصص عليه من قبل عن معاناة بلوغ المنى، تراه يعافر وينجز بقدرة رهيبة .. فقط لأن وحي ما قد بلّغه رسالة ربّه: أن سعيك سوف يرى ..
فحتى وإن استحالت عليه، يجد من الأبواب المغلقة، ألف طريقة تقول له هيت لك، لتفتح على يديه معجزة جديدة تعلّمه أن ما شاء الله كان...
#داليا_قاشوش
مقتنعة أنّ كلّ التوفيق الذي سيّرني إليه،
وكلّ الخوف الذي أزاحه عنّي..
بنعمة قيام اللّيل واللجوء للقرآن.
لستُ من عبادهِ الصّالحين،
لكنّني واللهِ من المؤمنين..
الحمدُ لله على أسبوعٍ مضى
بخيرٍ وسلامة وامتنان،
ولم أكن -لشدّته- أحتسبهُ من عمري.
- يوميّات فاطِميّة زنقيّة.
وحسبتُ أنّي أقترب،
وظننت أنّي على باب الوصول،
فنظرتُ بكلّي فرحاً فإنّي أوشكتُ أن أصل!
لكنّي يا أبتي،
وجدتُ طريقاً غير الطريق،
وحلماً غير الحلم..
أنا يا أبتي في هذه الدّار،
غريبٌ رُغم أنسي، وحيدٌ رغمَ صحبي..
- أحمد شُقير رحمهُ الله.
يا أصحاب،
آراؤكم هذه.. بالنسبة لي..
قيّمة، جدّاً قيّمة.
وصدقاً تعطونني طاقة..
في أكثر أيامي اسوداداً.
ممتنة كثيراً وعائدون للوحات بإذن الله.
سأعيد فتح البوت واستقبال طلباتكم
بكل حب يوم الجمعة القادم. 🤎
💌 وصلت لك رسالة جديدة
المحتوى : ↓↓
أسماء ليش مختفيه فاطمة حمضمض 🥹💔💔💔
حكيت معها من فترة مشان بدي وصي ع لوحه لانو لوحاتها بجننو بياخدو العقل حكيتها بس ما ردت
ورحت وصيت من بنت من عندنا لانو بدي لوحه مضطرة عليها بس اليوم كانت الصدمة لك بعتلها لوحه من لوحات فاطمه صورة يعني وقتلها بدي متلها تماما لك ولا بتشبها ابدا زعلت وغصة بقلبيي صارت وختنقت والله
بعد شغل فاطمة مافي 😭😭😭❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹
----
💡 يمكنك الرد بعمل رد على هذه ا
صديقتي تملك أجمل خطّ في العالَم،
خسارة لمن لا يدخل قناتها 💙:
https://t.me/sarahalsahhar
💘34⚡3
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @FATIMAHAMADMAD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
أحمد الصابوني @ahmadalsabouni · 45,583 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فاطِمة حمضمض” (@FATIMAHAMADMAD), 5,412 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FATIMAHAMADMAD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.