Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FCBarca Tweet | بارسا توییت

Channel

FCBarca Tweet | بارسا توییت

@FCBarca_Tweet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,246subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001168240501
TypeChannel
Username@FCBarca_Tweet
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FCBarca_Tweet

Growth

1,2321,2461,2396 August 2026 — 1,233 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,233 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,235 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,245 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,240 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,237 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,232 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,235 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,239 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,243 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,246 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,230–1,248 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 20:421,246+3
1 Sept 2026, 20:251,243+4
29 Aug 2026, 16:131,239+4
26 Aug 2026, 08:541,235+3
23 Aug 2026, 01:061,232-5
19 Aug 2026, 16:421,237-3
16 Aug 2026, 17:041,240-5
13 Aug 2026, 07:461,245+10
10 Aug 2026, 07:371,235+2
7 Aug 2026, 13:311,233no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:471,233first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2356.1%
💔717.1%
614.6%
🤣37.32%
😭24.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC41 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

پدری بعد از اینکه با یک ضربه از سد پرس گذشت و سرشو بالا برد: همون لحظه یامال کریم و گوردون: @FCBarca_Tweet | MS

6 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC46 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

گفته بودم اینو یه جایی دیده بودم؟ @FCBarca_Tweet | Grey

6 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC58 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

من درحال تصور تکرار این صحنه با کیت بارسا و جام معتبر خوان گمپر>> @FCBarca_Tweet | سعید

6 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC62 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

بیا بیناموس @FCBarca_Tweet | ▹ ᴬᴹᴵᴿ

6 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC58 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

انتظاری که 10 آگوست از آلوارز دارم در حالی که حتی نمیخواد کمی وارد حاشیه بشه بخاطر انتقال به بارسا @FCBarca_Tweet | Barca fan forever

6 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

مصدومیت💔 خدا ازت نگذره والورده @FCBarca_Tweet | عروس هلندی

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC79 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ازنظر شخصی من این خبرا فقط بازار گرمیه که هم هیت ها کم بشه به لاپورتا و هم شرایط واسه رئال سخت تر بشه و حتی باشگاه در سکوت خبری روی جذب الوارز کارکنه ولی بهرحال واقعا اگه لاپورتا رودری رو بیاره بارسا با همه کیری بازی هاش تا مدت های زیادی نباید هیت بخوره واقعا اگه بتونیم پنجره رو با گوردون،ادیمی،رودری و الوارز(😂)ببندیم به جرعت یکی از بهترین پنجره های اروپا رو داشتیم و راحت میتونیم مدعی باشیم واسه سی ال @FCBarca_Tweet

👍3

6 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC80 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

گاوی صورتی کرد رفت. @FCBarca_Tweet

🤣1

6 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC88 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

+ غیرممکنه یه بازیکن تموم ویژگی های فوتبالیو همزمان داشته باشه همچنان مسی : @FCBarca_Tweet | Ar

6 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC109 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

عکسو ببین...💔😭 @FCBarca_Tweet | قصاب بندرعباس

6👍1

6 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC106 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

دوتا از بهترین ورژن های اسطوره که متاسفانه پایان خوبی نداشتن. 💔 @FCBarca_Tweet | تجزیه طلب کاتالونیایی

💔7👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FCBarca_Tweet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

آچار فرانسه
@wrenchf · 32,015
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Khabarekotah
@Khabarekotah_Varzeshi · 37,890
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FCBarca Tweet | بارسا توییت” (@FCBarca_Tweet), 1,246 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FCBarca_Tweet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.