⚠️ JUST IN: Daniel Xan (formerly @devil on telegram) has been exposed after hosting parties with known rappers to launder stolen crypto A new telegram channel came out of no where and exposed Daniel Xan (formerly @devil), accusing him of stealing millions in crypto to fund a lavish lifestyle. The channel claims a $4.5M theft funded the $1M @devil username, with more evidence coming. @FEEONE PROTECTING THE COM

Channel
FeeOne
@FEEONE
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
11,852subscribers
-3,264 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003848999193 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FEEONE |
| Description | for ads/promos please contact the channel https://t.me/feeone?direct |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 1 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FEEONE |
Topic
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:17 | 11,852 | -14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:04 | 11,866 | -28 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:41 | 11,894 | -19 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:51 | 11,913 | -23 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:20 | 11,936 | -26 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:46 | 11,962 | -16 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:01 | 11,978 | -22 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 12,000 | -17 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 12,017 | -33 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:54 | 12,050 | -27 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 12,077 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:54 | 12,082 | -16 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 12,098 | -35 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:17 | 12,133 | -28 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:39 | 12,161 | -18 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:07 | 12,179 | -28 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:47 | 12,207 | -23 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 12,230 | -29 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:46 | 12,259 | -20 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 12,279 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 28
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
⚠️JUST IN: ZachXBT is launching a site to assist victims ZachXBT confirmed the service will not support victims from Canada, the UK, India, and several other countries due to law enforcement rarely making arrests in these cases. 🌐 : @feeone
⚠️ UPDATE; Apple confirms the removal of telegram. They state that it is now "only available to MacOS users." @feeone ⚠️
⚠️JUST IN: Telegram has been removed from the iOS App Store worldwide. The reason remains unknown, and as of now, neither Telegram nor the App Store has issued an official statement regarding the removal. @feeone 🌎
⚠️ JUST IN: Plush Pepe Lost to Screen-Sharing Scam A Plush Pepe worth $7,000 was sold for just $1 after the owner fell victim to a screen-sharing scam. During a phone call, a scammer convinced the user to enable screen sharing, then viewed a Telegram confirmation code as it was sent to the account. Using the code, the scammer logged in and sold the Pepe to themselves for Stars. Never enable screen sharing with stra…
⚠️JUST IN: Allbridge Core on Solana has been exploited for $1.6M+. The attacker took out a fake loan, successfully swapped $3K USDC for $2.2M USDT, and withdrew the funds immediately after @feeone
⚠️JUST IN: Over $80M was stolen through phishing and exploits throughout June. There were 67 recorded incidents in June, making it the highest monthly number of thefts so far in 2026. @feeone
⚠️JUST IN: A victim lost $700K+ after connecting their wallet to a 1:1 fake Polymarket phishing site. The cloned website was designed to look identical to the real platform, leading the victim to connect their wallet. Shortly after, all funds were drained from their account. @feeone 🥂
⚠️ JUST IN: Famous MEV bot “jaredfromsubway.eth” was drained for $7.5M. The victim was social engineered into signing a bait phishing approval, which compromised their wallet and resulted in $7M+ being stolen. @feeone 🔥
⚠️JUST IN: The FBI just sent a message to crypto fraudsters targeting Americans investors “No more. This FBI will find you, and we will bring you to justice.” @feeone 🚨
⚠️ Just In: Username @gram Has Just Been Transferred to Pavel Durov Pavel Durov has just received the NFT username @gram in his wallet following the rebranding of TON. The wallet that originally acquired the username has been inactive since November 2022, making this its first transaction in over 3 years. The username was originally acquired in November 2022 for 313,000 TON (~$519,580 at the time). @feeone
⚠️ JUST IN: Famous Singer Oliver Tree had been killed by a Helicopter. @feeone 🕊️
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FEEONE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @FEEONE as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 23 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 23 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 19 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@FEEONE named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 26 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FeeOne” (@FEEONE), 11,852 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FEEONE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.