Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ก๐—ž๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—ฌ๐—ฃ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜

Supergroup

๐—™๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ก๐—ž๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—ฌ๐—ฃ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜

@FRANKLIN_CRYPTO_chat

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

1,650members

+152 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

38 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002103437895
TypeSupergroup
Username@FRANKLIN_CRYPTO_chat
Descriptionโœ…ะžัะฝะพะฒะฝะพะน ะบะฐะฝะฐะป: @FRANKLIN_CRYPTAN โ˜‘๏ธะ’ะปะฐะดะตะปะตั†: @ZevsFK
First recorded25 September 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held14
On Telegramt.me/FRANKLIN_CRYPTO_chat

Topic

Crypto & trading โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4981,6501,5746 August 2026 โ€” 1,498 members7 August 2026 โ€” 1,499 members10 August 2026 โ€” 1,515 members13 August 2026 โ€” 1,534 members16 August 2026 โ€” 1,541 members19 August 2026 โ€” 1,554 members23 August 2026 โ€” 1,549 members26 August 2026 โ€” 1,566 members29 August 2026 โ€” 1,585 members6 September 2026 โ€” 1,623 members11 September 2026 โ€” 1,628 members14 September 2026 โ€” 1,631 members19 September 2026 โ€” 1,650 members25 September 2026 โ€” 1,650 members6 August 202625 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 50 days, net +152. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 1,475โ€“1,673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
25 Sept 2026, 15:581,650no change
19 Sept 2026, 01:551,650+19
14 Sept 2026, 22:221,631+3
11 Sept 2026, 14:401,628+5
6 Sept 2026, 16:401,623+38
29 Aug 2026, 21:451,585+19
26 Aug 2026, 22:041,566+17
23 Aug 2026, 16:071,549-5
19 Aug 2026, 19:031,554+13
16 Aug 2026, 18:451,541+7
13 Aug 2026, 06:181,534+19
10 Aug 2026, 03:311,515+16
7 Aug 2026, 09:121,499+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:451,498first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured โ€” we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ก๐—ž๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—ฌ๐—ฃ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜โ€ (@FRANKLIN_CRYPTO_chat), 1,650 members as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FRANKLIN_CRYPTO_chat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.