Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [Время на подумать] FRESH POUF

Channel

[Время на подумать] FRESH POUF

@FRESHSnas_TT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

101subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002635965064
TypeChannel
Username@FRESHSnas_TT
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FRESHSnas_TT

Growth

101112106.510 August 2026 — 107 subscribers10 August 2026 — 107 subscribers18 August 2026 — 112 subscribers25 August 2026 — 108 subscribers31 August 2026 — 102 subscribers10 September 2026 — 101 subscribers10 August 202610 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 99–114 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 05:36101-1
31 Aug 2026, 17:56102-6
25 Aug 2026, 18:24108-4
18 Aug 2026, 23:52112+5
10 Aug 2026, 17:30107no change
10 Aug 2026, 17:17107first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

146 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👾2919.9%
custom 52647854198363479062416.4%
1812.3%
custom 5852809379446788337149.59%
💯149.59%
custom 526294857399300114896.16%
😭96.16%
custom 546319109477264355085.48%
custom 525621508747507767674.79%
custom 531670645484397111353.42%
custom 540230068199231221442.74%
custom 534150439342023508021.37%
🔥21.37%
custom 540468892003208970610.685%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
58
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FRESHSnas_TT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC32 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52647854198363479063💯2🔥2👾1

6 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC41 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

ПОЧТА: Бро смотрит что моя ЛП сделала.. я упала и не встала (про упала и не встала шутка) —О! Крутяк! Эт там мистер 😍😍😘😍🥰😘😊💄✋ Слушай прям крутые рисуночки получаются у твоей подружайки 🤨 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #Почта

👾2custom 54023006819923122141

3 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC62 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

—О! Клёвый 🔴🟢💓❗️ 💓💙💜 Я так и не понял прикола, но прикольно иногда его юзать! А ещё зачёт за рисуночек. Я такой 🆎🆑🆑🆑🆑🆎 тут. 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠❗ 🩷 #Почта

custom 53167064548439711135custom 52629485739930011484👾1💯1custom 54023006819923122141custom 54046889200320897061custom 58528093794467883371

3 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC59 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👾4💯1custom 58528093794467883371

1 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC67 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

—Прикиньте! Эту ⚡️⚡️⚡️д⚡️⚡️ надо типа заряжать! А у меня 😀😀😀😀😀 провод погрызла! Не думал что во всех этих вселенных так тяжело откопать новый шнур! 🤩🤩🔠🔠❗ Это ведь даже не смешно В| Лады! Всё топчик. 🤩🤩🤩 Брошки! Как вы тут? Оооо! Рял! У меня ж на почте куча всякой рухляди. Завтра 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 В)

custom 525621508747507767642👾2💯2custom 54023006819923122142

28 Jul 2026, 20:30 UTC91 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— 🔠🔠🔠🔠❗️ Чуваки. Я вам такую историю расск

custom 53415043934202350802👾1💯1custom 52562150874750776761custom 52647854198363479061

25 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC140 views6 reactions8 Starsread 10 August 2026

— 😀☺️😀 🆑🆎🆑🆎🆎🆑❗️ Оке. Тогда покажи мне как нужно! Я ща приду 🕶🕶

4👾2

25 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC138 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

—Тебе не понравилось? 🤔 Хмм, я явно чёт упускаю!

custom 52647854198363479064👾3💯1

25 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC136 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— 🆑🆑🆎➖🆎🆑❗️ Всем моим супер-пупер крутым 🤨😀😀😀😀☺️😀😀 Я тип оооооч по вам скучал! Ваще прям невероятно! И на все 1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣🔣 уверен что вы тоже! Крч где я был всё эт время. По любасу ваши любопытные умишки об этом задумались! Да нигде. Прям пипяо 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 утопил в Вотерфолле! Я думал откачать уже не получится, а не! Один знакомый хакер спас ситуэйшн. 🤩🤩🤩 Я так подумуал. Надо бы второй мобик где-то раздобыть, что бы если эт

4👾2custom 54631910947726435502💯1custom 52647854198363479061

25 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC108 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

АДМ: СКОЛЬКО ЗВЁЗД???? 50 ЗА РАЗ? ЭТО СЛУЧАЙНО, ДА??? #щп

custom 58528093794467883376👾1💯1custom 52629485739930011481custom 52647854198363479061

25 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC88 views11 reactions50 Starsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @TelegTale_officialsPhoto

➿➿🤩𝗻𝓇e𝓼𝐭○ . 𝆹𝅥⃞𝆺𝅥 ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ 𝔇анная страница выходит из заморозки. 🤩уᴄᴛᴏᴛᴀ и ᴛиɯинᴀ ᴨᴏʍᴏᴦᴧи ʙᴏᴄᴄᴛᴀнᴏʙиᴛьᴄя. 🧪 Фреш!Санс Выходит из Реста. 🤩 Можете снова наслаждаться его постами. Пᴩияᴛнᴏᴦᴏ ᴨᴩᴏᴄʍᴏᴛᴩᴀ ʙᴀʍ, нᴀбᴧюдᴀᴛᴇᴧь. #АнРест

6custom 52629485739930011484💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FRESHSnas_TT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[Время на подумать] FRESH POUF” (@FRESHSnas_TT), 101 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FRESHSnas_TT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.