Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ž - ุดูˆูƒ

Channel

๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ž - ุดูˆูƒ

@F_9_5

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

6,982subscribers

+291 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001289977589
TypeChannel
Username@F_9_5
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/F_9_5

Growth

6,1446,9826,5638 August 2026 โ€” 6,691 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 6,660 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 6,676 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 6,543 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 6,497 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 6,349 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 6,207 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 6,144 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 6,618 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 6,673 subscribers8 September 2026 โ€” 6,982 subscribers8 August 20268 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net +291. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 6,018โ€“7,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 01:376,982+309
2 Sept 2026, 12:246,673+55
30 Aug 2026, 02:456,618+474
27 Aug 2026, 09:046,144-63
24 Aug 2026, 05:566,207-142
20 Aug 2026, 12:126,349-148
17 Aug 2026, 19:536,497-46
15 Aug 2026, 00:396,543-133
12 Aug 2026, 03:136,676+16
8 Aug 2026, 19:226,660-31
8 Aug 2026, 04:166,691first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
8.44%
avg views รท 6,982 subscribers
Avg views / post
589
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
โ€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held29 (30 July 2026 โ€“ 11 August 2026)
Views total6,479
Reactions totalโ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 37s
Average length
1m 37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 29 we hold a reading for ยท 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @F_9_5. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC326 viewsread 12 August 2026

ุฃุฌุนู„ู†ูŠู‘ ุฎูŠุฑุงู‹ ู„ูู†ูู‘ุณูŠ ูˆู„ูู…ู† ุญูˆู„ูŠู‘ ูŠุง ุงู„ู„ู‡ ๐Ÿค. โ€

Signed ุฃู†ุง ุญุณูŠู† .

11 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC329 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ุฃู†ุง ุญุณูŠู† .

11 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC339 viewsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

Signed ุฃู†ุง ุญุณูŠู† .

9 Aug 2026, 22:24 UTC619 viewsread 12 August 2026

ุงู„ู„ู‡ู…ู‘ ุฅู†ู‘ูŠ ุฃุณุชุบูุฑูƒ ู…ู† ูƒู„ู‘ ุณูŠู‘ุฆุฉ ุงุฑุชูƒุจุชู‡ุง ููŠ ุจูŠุงุถ ุงู„ู†ู‘ู‡ุงุฑ ูˆุณูˆุงุฏ ุงู„ู„ูŠู„ .

Signed ๐—›๐˜‚๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ก ๐—”๐—น๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—•๐—ถ

9 Aug 2026, 22:23 UTC616 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ๐—›๐˜‚๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ก ๐—”๐—น๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—•๐—ถ

9 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC698 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

- ุงู„ู ุนุงููŠู‡ ูŠุณุชุงู‡ู„ูˆู† ๐Ÿ‘ผ๐Ÿ‘ผ .

Signed ๐—›๐˜‚๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ก ๐—”๐—น๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—•๐—ถ

9 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC613 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ๐—›๐˜‚๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ก ๐—”๐—น๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—•๐—ถ

9 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC649 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

- ุงู„ู ุนุงููŠู‡ ูŠุณุชุงู‡ู„ โœจ๐Ÿ’™ .

Signed ๐—›๐˜‚๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ก ๐—”๐—น๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—•๐—ถ

9 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC903 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Happy birthday โœจ๐Ÿ’™ .

Signed ๐—›๐˜‚๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ก ๐—”๐—น๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—•๐—ถ

9 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC702 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ๐—›๐˜‚๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ก ๐—”๐—น๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—•๐—ถ

9 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC685 viewsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

Signed ๐—›๐˜‚๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ก ๐—”๐—น๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—•๐—ถ

8 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC662 viewsread 12 August 2026

ุงู„ู„ู‡ูู…ู‘ูŽ ุจุดุฑู†ุง ุจู…ุง ูŠูุทู…ุฆู† ุงู„ุฑูˆุญ ูˆูŠุฌุจุฑ ุงู„ุฎุงุทุฑ .

Signed ๐—›๐˜‚๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ก ๐—”๐—น๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—ฎ๐—•๐—ถ

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @F_9_5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ž - ุดูˆูƒโ€ (@F_9_5), 6,982 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/F_9_5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.