Fabrizio Romano Actus fr 🇫🇷 pinned a photo

Channel
Fabrizio Romano Actus fr 🇫🇷
@FabrizioRomanoActusfr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
33,114subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002384150780 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FabrizioRomanoActusfr |
| Description | Here we Go !! Retrouvez tous les actualités de Fabrizio Romano ici en français 🇫🇷 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FabrizioRomanoActusfr |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 33,114 | -23 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 33,137 | +6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 33,131 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 33,139 | -6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 33,145 | -21 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 33,166 | -25 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 33,191 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 33,196 | +10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:14 | 33,186 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 33,191 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 33,195 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 33,193 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 33,198 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 33,195 | +15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 33,180 | +13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 33,167 | +17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 33,150 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 33,147 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 33,150 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 33,148 | first reading |
Engagement
1,012 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.60%
- avg views ÷ 33,114 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,190
- 472 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.64%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 473
- of 1,012 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,012 (6 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 562,250 |
| Reactions total | 9,243 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 06:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈9,530
- Videos
- ≈15
- Links
- ≈340
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
20,114 reactions across 998 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12,321 | 61.3% | |
| 👍 | 1,138 | 5.66% | |
| 🔥 | 954 | 4.74% | |
| 👏 | 658 | 3.27% | |
| 🤩 | 507 | 2.52% | |
| 🎉 | 506 | 2.52% | |
| 🥰 | 506 | 2.52% | |
| ⚡ | 404 | 2.01% | |
| 🙏 | 396 | 1.97% | |
| 🏆 | 368 | 1.83% | |
| 😁 | 367 | 1.82% | |
| 👌 | 328 | 1.63% | |
| 🕊 | 328 | 1.63% | |
| 💯 | 320 | 1.59% | |
| 😍 | 304 | 1.51% | |
| 🐳 | 272 | 1.35% | |
| 🤣 | 203 | 1.01% | |
| 😢 | 126 | 0.626% | |
| 🤮 | 25 | 0.124% | |
| 🤡 | 21 | 0.104% | |
| 14 further kinds | 62 | 0.308% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 998 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🆘« À la recherche d'analyses football approfondies et documentées ? Retrouvez nos analyses et sélections du jour dans notre communauté WhatsApp. Rejoignez-nous dès maintenant et faites vos propres choix en toute connaissance de cause. Cliquez sur le lien ci-dessous pour nous rejoindre ! » ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb74AyU4inogmuygmI06 Les sélections sportives de demain sont déjà disponi…
⚡1
🇪🇸🔴OFFICIEL : Le FC Barcelone est désormais sur Telegram📱 ! Ne manquez plus aucune actualité de votre club préféré : infos, matchs, coulisses et bien plus encore vous attendent. ▶️ Rejoignez dès maintenant la communauté et vivez la passion Barça au quotidien : https://t.me/fcbarcainfos https://t.me/fcbarcainfos https://t.me/fcbarcainfos https://t.me/fcbarcainfos 🔥 Tous les fans du Barça sont attendus… Visca Barç
❤2🙏1
🚨 Dean Huijsen a déclaré concernant l'arbitre : « Si ce qui s'est passé contre l'Atlético s'était produit dans l'autre sens... ...il y aurait certainement eu une GRANDE polémique », a-t-il déclaré à OK Diario.
🎉3
🚨 Dean Huijsen : « À mon avis, la défaite lors du derby de Madrid est de ma faute. C'est ma responsabilité ». « Nous aurions pu gagner le match », a-t-il déclaré à OK Diario.
🙏5
🚨🚨Plus de Neymar avec le Brésil… RAPHINHA RÉCUPÈRE LE NUMÉRO 🔟 EN SÉLECTION !!! 🇧🇷🇧🇷
🏆14❤5
🤖🇳🇴 Erling Haaland a marqué 63 buts en 56 sélections avec la Norvège.
❤46
❤️🫂 Jürgen Klopp et Virgil van Dijk avant le match.
👏23❤6❤🔥2
👏🏻🇵🇹 Cristiano Ronaldo, s'échauffant pour son 234e match international avec le Portugal. 979 buts en carrière, 146 buts en équipe nationale.
⚡16❤6
👋🏼🇳🇱 Xavi Hernández, arrivant pour son premier match à domicile en tant qu'entraîneur de l'équipe nationale néerlandaise. Un moment spécial pour Xavi, qui ouvre une nouvelle ère avec l'Oranje. ✨
👍14❤1
🤩👋🏼 Jürgen Klopp arrive pour entamer une nouvelle ère en tant que nouvel entraîneur de l'équipe nationale allemande. 🇩🇪 Jour de début pour Klopp.
👌14❤4
🚨🔵🔴 Deco, dirigeant du FC Barcelone : « Julián Álvarez est désormais du passé ». « Nous devons regarder vers l'avenir, et nous sommes satisfaits de ce que nous avons. J'espère qu'il va bien aussi et qu'il aidera son club. » « Il y a de nombreux transferts et de nombreuses recrues qui ne se réalisent tout simplement pas. »
❤12😍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,012 posts we hold for @FabrizioRomanoActusfr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@laliguedeschampions · 6,6529 posts🗞𝐁𝐀𝐑𝐂𝐀 𝐈𝐍𝐅𝐎𝐒💙❤️
@fcbarcainfos · 6,4906 posts🔥 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐆𝐋𝐄 𝐓𝐕 𝐁𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐒𝐒 𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐀𝐁𝐋𝐄 𝐄𝐍 𝐀𝐅𝐑𝐈𝐐𝐔𝐄 🌍
@chelseainfos · 1,6872 posts🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷French Writing🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷
@ExtrabetTR10 · 11 postFabrizio Romano
@fabrizioromano · 14,5491 postSteven Railston
@StevenRailston · 81 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@FabrizioRomanoActusfr named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fabrizio Romano Actus fr 🇫🇷” (@FabrizioRomanoActusfr), 33,114 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FabrizioRomanoActusfr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.