Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Faghat Signal | فقط سیگنال

Channel

Faghat Signal | فقط سیگنال

@Faghat_Signal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,912subscribers

-2,414 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001624956348
TypeChannel
Username@Faghat_Signal
Description💠 اینجا فقط سیگنال میدیم 💠 کافیه ترید کردن بلد باشی 💠 باقیش رو بسپار به ما 📢 کانال اموزش https://t.me/tradee_asan
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Faghat_Signal

Growth

19,91222,32621,1198 August 2026 — 22,326 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,248 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,114 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,958 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,777 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,654 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,485 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,298 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,139 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,003 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,901 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,795 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,649 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,498 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,345 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,256 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,171 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,114 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,022 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,912 subscribers8 August 202630 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 21 days, net -2,414. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,550–22,688 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 03:3419,912-110
29 Aug 2026, 00:1920,022-92
28 Aug 2026, 01:1320,114-57
26 Aug 2026, 23:2620,171-85
26 Aug 2026, 00:1820,256-89
24 Aug 2026, 22:2620,345-153
23 Aug 2026, 10:2620,498-151
21 Aug 2026, 21:0820,649-146
20 Aug 2026, 19:3220,795-106
19 Aug 2026, 22:1120,901-102
18 Aug 2026, 21:4621,003-136
17 Aug 2026, 18:4721,139-159
16 Aug 2026, 17:1621,298-187
15 Aug 2026, 01:5321,485-169
13 Aug 2026, 16:3821,654-123
12 Aug 2026, 15:0821,777-181
11 Aug 2026, 14:4421,958-156
10 Aug 2026, 14:3322,114-134
9 Aug 2026, 14:1522,248-78
8 Aug 2026, 19:0022,326first reading

Engagement

86 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.4%
avg views ÷ 19,912 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,070
76 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.199%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
76
of 86 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held86 (28 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total309,340
Reactions total617
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,780
Videos
4
Links
60

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

764 reactions across 86 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
764100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 764reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
69
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 86 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
30
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Faghat_Signal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 86 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈3,850 views13 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#بیت_کوین ➕ در تایم فریم روزانه از منطقه ی سنگین مقاومتی ریجکت شد .. در چارت منطقه ی مقاومتی را علامت زدیم و اگر امروز هم نتواند کندل روزانه ی قبلی را اینگالف کند میتواند در پله ی اول تا 73000 اصلاح کند و ما هم تمرکز بر سیگنالهای شورت میذاریم ..

13

25 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈4,260 views8 reactionsread 30 August 2026

📈 Limit signal - long 📌 Pair: #JST/USDT 🏦 Exchange: Binance / Mexc / XT /Toobit / Lbank / WEEX / BingX ⚖️ Leverage: 5x 💰 Entry : 0.09988 🏹 Target: 0.10024 - 0.10080 - 0.10133 - 0.10215 - 0.10300 🚨 Stop: 0.09885 در تایم فریم پایین، مدیریت سرمایه حتما داشته باشد.

8

24 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC≈4,290 views4 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#PAXG #USDT ➕ در مسیر تحلیل ..

4

23 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC≈4,310 views15 reactions4 Starsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#بیت_کوین #ماهانه ➕ در چارت کندل ماهانه ی بیت کوین را داریم که به منطقه ی اوردر بلاک که باعث شکست سقف شده بود و بیت را به بالای 120 هزار دلار رسانده بود در این چند روزه واکنش نشان داده است .. یکبار نقدینگی را در 58000 جمع آوری کرده و به بالا رفته و دوباره حرکت دیگری از این منطقه آغاز کرده .. نظر من همان نظر قبلی هست که باید نقدینگی منطقه ی 49000 زده شود اگر تازه به فکر زدن نقدینگی ها کف تر نباشد ... بعد حرکتی آغاز

15

23 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC≈4,090 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#PUMP #USDT ➕فول تارگت شد البته ما جانب احتیاط رو رعایت کرده بودیم و خارج شده بودیم ..

5

23 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC≈4,070 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#بیت_کوین ➕ مقاومت بسیار سنگین در منطقه ی 81250 دارد و حمایت در منطقه ی 69000 .. اندکی صبر کنید تا واکنش به مناطق را ببینیم و جهت بازار معلوم شود جهت گرفتن پوزیشن های شورت یا لانگ .. البته ما استاپ تمام سیگنالهای اسپات را بسیار نزدیک گرفته بودیم و در نزدیکی مقاومت خروج زدیم ..

7

23 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC≈4,050 views11 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#SHIB #USDT ➕بنظرم در جای خوبی برای یک حرکت 150 درصدی قرار گرفته است .. اگر بیت بالای 63000 تثبیت حرکتی کند این میتواند یکی از گزینه ها برای تشکیل سبد باشد .. البته در تایم فریم پایین ورود اعلام میکنیم ..

11

22 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC≈4,160 views8 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#PUMP #USDT ➕ 200 درصدی شد .. کامل خروج بزنید .. 🚀

8

22 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC≈4,210 views9 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#PUMP #USDT ➕ در بازار خراب ابتدا ارز را برای 25% سود بصورا اسپات سیگنال کردیم .. و بعد با توجه به حرکت خوب ارز مداوم سیگنالهای بعدی را دادیم تا الان که به 185 درصد سود رسیده .. منطقه ی مقاومتی در چارت پیداست ..

9

22 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC≈4,130 views10 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#XLM #USDT ➕30 درصدی شد ... 🚀

10

22 Aug 2026, 03:28 UTC≈4,030 views9 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#ZEC #USDT ➕50 درصدی شد . از بهترین های بازار بود در این 3 روز .. 🚀✋

9

22 Aug 2026, 03:26 UTC≈3,980 views10 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#WLD #USDT ➕41 درصدی شد ... 🚀

10

Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @Faghat_Signal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@Faghat_Signal edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 250,722 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

گلدن سیگنال | رایگان
@VipGoldenFree · 130,454
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
سیگنال ارز دیجیتال | نکست پرافیت
@thenextprofit · 48,336
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
TP Hunter | سیگنال اساتید
@tphunter · 144,108
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
TROON🔷محسن ترون
@TROON · 1,450,423
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
TOBTC 👉Technical Analysis
@TOBTC · 43,639
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto Azarmi | ارز دیجیتال
@Crypto_Azarmi · 51,328
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
𝘛𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘶𝘺𝘯𝘦 𝘛𝘦𝘢𝘮 | ᴮᵘˡˡ |
@Tethruyne_team · 90,446
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
سیگنال رایگان
@GoldSignalBtc · 193,019
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
سیگنال رایگان 🐊Crocodile Trade
@crocodile_trade · 208,021
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Faghat Signal | فقط سیگنال” (@Faghat_Signal), 19,912 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Faghat_Signal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.