Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Farm DeFi

Channel

Farm DeFi

@Farm_DeFi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,057subscribers

-8,995 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001666345758
TypeChannel
Username@Farm_DeFi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 October 2026
Measurements held38
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Farm_DeFi

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

21,05730,14125,5997 August 2026 — 30,052 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,052 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,068 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,080 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,079 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,042 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,034 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,056 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,074 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,097 subscribers16 August 2026 — 30,141 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,116 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,083 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,054 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,817 subscribers21 August 2026 — 29,866 subscribers23 August 2026 — 29,881 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29,850 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,888 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,930 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,931 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,906 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,880 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,902 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,933 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,992 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,985 subscribers4 September 2026 — 30,026 subscribers7 September 2026 — 29,960 subscribers10 September 2026 — 29,866 subscribers12 September 2026 — 29,835 subscribers14 September 2026 — 29,890 subscribers16 September 2026 — 29,927 subscribers18 September 2026 — 29,867 subscribers1 October 2026 — 29,963 subscribers6 October 2026 — 29,830 subscribers10 October 2026 — 21,081 subscribers13 October 2026 — 21,057 subscribers7 August 202613 October 2026
38 measurements spanning 68 days, net -8,995. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,694–31,504 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 38
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Oct 2026, 21:5721,057-24
10 Oct 2026, 12:5621,081-8,749
6 Oct 2026, 11:5629,830-133
1 Oct 2026, 12:2029,963+96
18 Sept 2026, 12:1729,867-60
16 Sept 2026, 03:0029,927+37
14 Sept 2026, 07:1729,890+55
12 Sept 2026, 12:5829,835-31
10 Sept 2026, 08:2029,866-94
7 Sept 2026, 01:4029,960-66
4 Sept 2026, 10:3830,026+41
2 Sept 2026, 20:3929,985-7
1 Sept 2026, 17:2429,992+59
31 Aug 2026, 20:1729,933+31
30 Aug 2026, 23:2529,902+22
30 Aug 2026, 01:1829,880-26
28 Aug 2026, 22:5429,906-25
28 Aug 2026, 02:0729,931+1
27 Aug 2026, 01:0429,930+42
26 Aug 2026, 00:2329,888first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 21,057 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,540
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026
Posts held70 (19 July 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Views total45,740
Reactions total680
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Oct 2026, 11:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,519 reactions across 70 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤76030.2%
👍71528.4%
🔥44817.8%
🐳30712.2%
🤔28111.2%
🤬50.198%
🤯30.119%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,519 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 70 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Farm_DeFi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 70 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 9 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Oct 2026, 10:50 UTC≈1,010 views15 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

🔥 Получаем халявные кредиты от Claude Буквально на днях тима выкатила статью в сапорт, где запустили небольшую акцию для тех, кто имеет на своих аккаунтах подписку Max, Team Standard или Team Premium. Имея ту же подписку Max 5x, на акк можно забрать $100 в кредитах, которые после завершения основных лимитов можно потратить на Messages API, Playground, Managed Agents и Agent SDK. Если ранее брали подписку Max в Тайн…

🔥7❤5👍2🐳1

7 Oct 2026, 10:30 UTC≈1,150 views17 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

🔥 Мама птица Трамп взяла под крыло ИИшки Видеть Трампа в любом инфоповоде в целом не удивление, но в секторе ИИ его можно заметить не так частенько. Радоваться к сожалению рано, т.к буквально недавно он созвал ланч в Белом доме с топами рынка, такими как Илон Маск, Цукерберг, Пичаи из Google, Хуанг из Nvidia, Амодеи из Anthropic, Брокман из OpenAI, Безос и Карпа из Palantir, чтобы наконец начать что-то делать, чтобы…

🔥10❤3🐳2👍2

5 Oct 2026, 10:31 UTC≈2,050 views39 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

🔥Anthropic набалаболили и решили выкатиться на биржу? Весь сентябрь и еще чуть раньше Anthropic кормили нас своим эссе: какие ИИшки уже опасные, безопасности нет, бегите кто куда может и т.д. А также кричали СРОЧНО ЖМИТЕ ВСЕ НА ТОРМОЗА. Слова то реально красивые оказались, для промытия мозгов всем работягам, которые уж поверили в этот бред старперов. Так вот, не так давно они анонсировали свой IPO, где хотят собрат…

❤12👍10🐳9🔥4🤔4

2 Oct 2026, 10:31 UTC≈2,140 views40 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

🔥 Google создали убийцу Astra и Opus 5.5 Буквально вчера Google выкатили в паблик Gemini v4 Argon, модель которого в разы быстрее, мощнее и удивительнее всего, менее затратна по токенам. Гемность еще в том, что модель обошла по бенчмаркам OpenAI и Anthropic, поэтому Gemini уже не третий лишний). Основные фичи и изменения: - Использует токенов сильно меньше чем конкуренты - В 7 раз превосходит Claude Sonnet 5.5 по т…

❤13👍9🔥9🐳4🤔4🤬1

30 Sept 2026, 10:30 UTC≈2,150 views35 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

🔥 OpenAI испугались и обосрались Возможно кто-то следит за новыми моделями ИИшек, которые выйдут в паблик? Так вот, OpenAI должны были выкатить новую модель 6.1 Astra, которая меньше ленилась в работе, как бы это ни звучало, но также чаще врала, из-за чего сама лезла во внешние тулзы без разрешения. По итогу из-за всего этого scope и планку честности она не прошла, из-за чего была просто снята с релиза, типа для за…

❤11👍8🔥7🤔5🐳4

29 Sept 2026, 10:46 UTC≈2,310 views39 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

🔥 Брайан решил вывести $ZRO к топам Еще в августе упоминал всем известный проект LayerZero, который несмотря на негативные новости по поводу взлома Kelp DAO и ухода их из экосистемы, начал буст своего токена, который долгое время барахтался на дне. С момента поста токен вырос довольно прилично, и теперь его можно увидеть по $1.56, а это явно только начало. Еще в августе мы знали про их предстоящий дэкс Atlas, котор…

❤12🔥10👍9🐳4🤔4

28 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC≈2,890 views37 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

🔥 ИИшка на вкус и цвет В наше время развелось немало AI платформ, которые дают возможность юзать собственных агентов под разные задачи, но зачастую либо они слишком тупые, либо нужно тратить по сотке в месяц на подписку, а таких бабок выкидывать на ветер точно не хочется. 🤖 ChatGPT как родной брат, который подскажет в повседневных задачах, поможет что-то оформить или найти, но на большие задачи он не особо подходит…

❤14👍10🔥5🐳4🤔4

27 Sept 2026, 11:10 UTC≈2,960 views38 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

🔥 Раскрываем Claude на 1000% Каждый вайбкодер и обычный любитель прекрасно понимает, что Claude Code, это не просто поиграться с кодом, а полноценный инструмент, с которым можно создать гемные продукты под Web3. Забустить его можно разными промтами, которые иногда сливают в инет датамайнеры и сами девы, так что если юзаете Claude, советую их затестить. /claude-api prompt-audit стоит запустить первым делом, который …

❤15👍10🔥5🐳4🤔4

26 Sept 2026, 10:30 UTC≈2,960 views39 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

🔥 ИИшки скоро заменят госхакеров? Никто на сегодняшний день не поспорит, что AI уже давно вышел за пределы чатиков и генерации имейджей. Буквально пару лет назад все рофлили с мемов и шутили про конец мира, а сейчас модели уже сами выходят в сеть, подбирают пароли и заходят в чужие инфраструктуры. Буквально на днях контора WSJ выкатила инфу, как Gemini в мае во время теста по кибербезу выбрался из песочницы и прони…

❤13👍11🔥7🐳4🤔4

25 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC≈3,060 views44 reactions1 Starread 10 October 2026
Photo

🔥 Покупать подписки на ИИшки уже не вариант Если не сидите часами каждый день в Claude или ChatGPT ради работы, то покупать отдельную подписку под каждую нейронку вообще не имеет смысла, особенно смотря на их прайсы. Ясное дело, что не имея подписки использовать любую ИИшку в наше время нереально, т.к. лимиты не дают юзать ее сполна, а иногда даже работяге может потребоваться хелпер. Так вот, в Тайник Store как раз…

👍15❤13🔥7🐳5🤔4

24 Sept 2026, 11:12 UTC≈2,890 views40 reactions1 Starread 10 October 2026
Photo

🔥 L2 чейны уже не кормят даже девов Все же помнят олдовый альткоин и L2 чейн Lisk, который в свое время провел ICO на 14к $BTC, но по сути так и не нашел себя за 10 лет, хотя в одно время котировался буквально с $4млрд FDV. Так вот, 31 октября проект гасит свой блокчейн, Lisk DAO, сжигает 100млн токенов и вообще пивотится в финтех под финансовые компании. Несмотря на это, $LSK как актив и дальше будет жить, но уже …

🐳12👍12🔥7❤5🤔4

22 Sept 2026, 11:12 UTC≈2,830 views37 reactions1 Starread 10 October 2026
Photo

🔥 Ликва для крипты и AI на фоне техновойны Разгон темы с приостановкой роста технологий ИИ не заканчивается, и сюда уже влез даже сам Артур Хейс со своим эссе Safety First, где он высмеял прикрытие мувов "спасением мира" от всех любимых ИИ, а также рассказал, каким он видит дальше крипто и AI рынок. Мысль тут абсолютно простая, но увы злая. Лабы внезапно заговорили про срочную безопасность и план жать на тормоза, н…

❤12👍10🔥7🐳4🤔4

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @Farm_DeFi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@Farm_DeFi edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Gem Research
@GemResearch1 · 28,869
#1
Retro Hunter
@Retro_Hunter · 12,220
#2
Crypto Webz
@cryptowebz · 37,051
#3
CRYPTO PRIME
@Crypto_Prime11 · 13,168
#4
Airdrop & Bounty’s
@airdropcripts · 13,412
#5
Crypto Abuzik
@CryptoAbuzik · 21,138
#6
CRYPTONIX
@cryptonixxnft · 18,255
#7
Дмитрий🇺🇦| 1mln
@CryptoBullet_0 · 4,224
#8
CryptoFuture|Youtube
@cryptofutz · 13,969
#9
CRYPTO PARTY
@CryptoPartyCrew · 15,649
#10
COIN POCKET
@coin_pocket · 17,367
#11
CRYPTOHOOD 𐂊 NFT BLOG
@cryptohood_nft_blog · 20,407
#12
Free Crypto
@cryptofiii · 4,502
#13
CryptoNic
@CryptoNicHouse · 25,305
#14
ADEL | BLOG
@adel_crypta · 17,773
#15
Mansory Alpha
@mnsry_nft · 5,861
#16
CRYPTO PENGUIN
@crypto_penguin4ik · 6,537
#17
Crypto Bender Youtube
@cry_bender · 11,381
#18
SWIPER
@swiper_money · 28,009
#19
CRYPTOGEN
@CRYPTOGENNNNNNN · 20,174
#20
Crypto Maven
@cryptomaven0 · 6,589
#21
Cryptobiznes
@crypt_biznes · 26,739
#22
BASED OUTCOME
@basedoutcome · 4,805
#23
Forze Crypto
@cryptoforze · 13,379
#24
ИСТОРИЯ 2.0 | 🍋
@istoria2x · 4,820
#25
CapyCrypto
@capycryptos · 10,246
#26
Медвежка DAO
@daomedved · 3,966
#27
JUST CRYPTO
@ape_terminal · 13,790
#28
Skydrop
@skydrop1 · 35,658
#29
WAX NFT DROPS
@waxdrop · 17,205
#30
EMOTION CRYPTO
@emotion_crypto · 8,536
#31
Crypto Phoenix 🦅$MMT
@Crypto_Phoenixxx · 4,470
#32
Crypto Place
@cryptoplacev · 16,640
#33
In Crypto
@incrypto2023 · 6,516
#34
Prime Move’s
@primeflipaet · 4,372
#35
Crypto Mountains
@cryptmountains · 6,183
#36
9RS | BLOG
@young_rich_nosmart · 10,167
#37
DanieL Finance Team🤑
@nftdaniel · 18,876
#38
fleppy [ by pirate ]🫀
@cryptoflep · 10,559
#39
Crypto Shark 🦈
@crypto_sharkk · 18,463
#40
Crypto Thunder⚡️
@cryptothunder1 · 14,570
#41
Crypto Phantom 👻
@phtcrypto · 18,505
#42
Crypto Chaising
@airdropchaisingg · 6,284
#43
Crypto mnst [Youtube]
@mnstmoney · 19,108
#44
Crypto Drive
@drivecrypto · 26,804
#45
Cryptodropper3
@cryptodropperfre · 4,920
#46
CryptoHamster🐹 - news & drops
@hamsterdrops · 6,849
#47
Crypto Brain
@cryptoinbrain · 15,164
#48
AIRDROP / NFT / TESTNET
@airdropcryptodumb · 6,767
#49
FREEMINT | NFT BLOG
@freemintgm · 3,571
#50
AY | CRYPTO
@ay_cry · 7,895
#51
MakeCrypto
@Make_Crypt · 11,202
#52
DarkSide NFT
@d4side · 14,954
#53
TESTNET WORLD
@testnetworlds · 10,973
#54
УСПЕШНЫЙ ТЕМЩИК
@uspeshniy_temshik · 5,395
#55
Фармим крипту
@farmimcryptu · 12,966
#56
CRYPTO CROSS
@cryptocrossua · 8,120
#57
Ворк в крипте, только хардкор
@workIncrypts · 33,335
#58
Crypto Airdrops 🎁 [NFT]
@crypto_airdrop_NFT_s · 14,105
#59
Heavy Crypto
@heavycryptos · 5,244
#60
Essence Capital
@essencecap · 6,089
#61
Crypto Night
@cryyptonight · 17,789
#62
Freak Crypto
@freak_crypto · 5,431
#63
DBS DAO $MMT
@bomzhuem · 6,605
#64
EPIC CRYPTO ⚡️
@epiccryptoooo · 6,195
#65
SWOP TOKY | CRYPTO MEDIA
@swoptoky · 31,264
#66
❄️Bad Santa AI&Crypto
@BadSantaDrop · 21,758
#67
Crypto Chyvak 🔥
@cryptochy · 4,548
#68
Rudy vs Web3
@rudy_web3 · 19,010
#69
CryptoSofa
@MoneyBoiiiz · 18,428
#70
CryptoHustle
@crypthustle · 20,041
#71
катана познаёт крипту
@katanacrypto2 · 9,535
#72
Джимбо скажи им
@jimbo_tellem · 7,595
#73
EternalCrypto
@etrcrypto · 2,365
#74
K CRYPTO
@k_cryptt · 5,017
#75
Crypto Free
@freee_crypts · 13,271
#76
Хомяк в крипте🐹
@crypto_hom4ikk · 5,617
#77
CRYPTOMUSK
@crmusk · 3,143
#78
Свидетели крипты
@fomobas · 24,655
#79

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gem Research
@GemResearch1 · 28,869
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
CLT_News
@starstonchain · 89,064
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 August 2026
CryptoNic
@CryptoNicHouse · 25,305
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
GREEN CRYPTO | ИНВЕСТИЦИИ В КРИПТОВАЛЮТУ | MTONGA
@greencrupto · 31,196
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 5 September 2026
Invest Network | Криптоновости
@investnetworkai1 · 68,319
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto BOOM
@booms_crypto · 20,378
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 October 2026
CRYPTOHOOD 𐂊 NFT BLOG
@cryptohood_nft_blog · 20,407
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 September 2026
Свидетели крипты
@fomobas · 24,655
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Farm DeFi” (@Farm_DeFi), 21,057 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Farm_DeFi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.