Channel
𝐖𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐄 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐁𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐊
@Fati_426
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,544subscribers
-64 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001573876563 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fati_426 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fati_426 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:29 | 2,544 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:26 | 2,548 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 2,552 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 2,553 | -3 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:31 | 2,556 | -2 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 23:41 | 2,558 | -6 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:59 | 2,564 | -7 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 2,571 | -12 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 2,583 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:55 | 2,586 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 2,586 | -6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 2,592 | -9 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 2,601 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:45 | 2,608 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Dryyghu · 26,169
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 18 September 2026
@takhribchi_org · 32,501
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 1 September 2026
@newsarzcrypto · 11,481
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐖𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐄 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐁𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐊” (@Fati_426), 2,544 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fati_426.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.