Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Faulty 👁||16+

Channel

Faulty 👁||16+

@Faulty_0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

168subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001905702420
TypeChannel
Username@Faulty_0
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Faulty_0

Growth

165168166.512 August 2026 — 166 subscribers13 August 2026 — 166 subscribers28 August 2026 — 165 subscribers8 September 2026 — 168 subscribers12 August 20268 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 26 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 165–168 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 00:58168+3
28 Aug 2026, 21:34165-1
13 Aug 2026, 04:56166no change
12 Aug 2026, 18:46166first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 20 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 12 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🫡4325.6%
👍3319.6%
custom 5343524093201228506148.33%
custom 5256201833206006807127.14%
🙏127.14%
🍓116.55%
🌚84.76%
custom 527190806045604394463.57%
👀52.98%
💋42.38%
😨31.79%
custom 527836278212162314721.19%
👏21.19%
😢21.19%
🤔21.19%
🤝21.19%
🎃10.595%
😁10.595%
😭10.595%
😱10.595%
3 further kinds31.79%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jul 2026, 23:49 UTC86 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ребята, что этим хотел сказать автор? А, точно! То что он ссыкуха мелкая, что не может сказать прямо, и прячется за ебаными аннонимками✌️ Раз ТЕБЕ и кому-то кто тут по неизвестной причине сидит, не ебись зачем, не нравится мои РИСУНКИ, то go to нахуй отсюда, лол. Мне не 15 чтобы обижаться на маленькое чмо, что высирает подобный шлак в анонимки, ыахахахах Всем подобным, просьба, съебитесь пж, тут всё равно постов е

🌚8👀5🤔2🤝2

4 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC113 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Неожиданный вопрос, хех. Вот тут к сожалению я пока ответа не знаю... Но я подумаю, как чисто теоретически такое можно было провести, сейчас пока-что сил нет на думанья... Артов нет по той же причине, простите коты #ответ

custom 53435240932012285064

22 Jun 2026, 20:27 UTC154 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ой да все по маленьку. Работаю, рисую когда силы есть, даже лепить из глины начал, ыхых. Переехал, не из Питера если что, ахахаах Живу, лечусь🤭😠 #ответ

👍6🫡3

9 Jun 2026, 13:12 UTC196 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Баля... Татухи показать... Сейчас честно, так лень... Единственное что скажу, у меня на ляхе новая татуха в виде сколопендры, живите с этим #ответ

🫡6🤩1😱1

9 Jun 2026, 13:08 UTC160 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Неожиданный вопрос. Вот тут к сожалению могу с уверенностью сказать, что в ближайшее время артов по Дому не будет. По сути, я считаю себя уже вышедшим, и в данный момент дом для меня приятное прошлое... Если у кого еще есть вопросы, задавайте, анонимка ещё открыта #ответ

🫡6custom 53435240932012285062🤯1

9 Jun 2026, 12:53 UTC128 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ДА ЧТО ЗА ЭПОПЕЯ ПРЕСС F, Я НЕ ПОНИМАЮ 😪 Я про реакцию если что, ПОЧЕМУ ИМЕННО ОНА

🫡6🎃1👍1

9 Jun 2026, 12:25 UTC125 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Опять закину скетчики сюда. Меня разрывает, опять гпф на сраных слипов, я скоро начну убивать😠 #скетч

🫡12custom 52783627821216231472😁1

8 Jun 2026, 15:50 UTC100 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пара максимально рандомных скетчей с моими персонажами-дамами. В последнее время тяжело поддаться на полноценки, увы. И всё ещё задумываюсь над переходом в вк. но переход будет только с "условием" того, что хоть кто то да перейдёт туда, а не от болды постить туда. #скетч

🍓11💋4🫡4👏1

4 Jun 2026, 14:57 UTC121 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Не рисунок конечно, но хвастаюсь каких пупсов сделал. Кровью, потом, но сделал Пола и Криса. Не особо рад результатом покраса, но бля я не мастер, меня всё устраивает 🤘

🙏10🫡3

4 Jun 2026, 10:14 UTC119 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Тут ещё есть кто живой? Да да, не было хуеву тучу времени, и вернулся #щитпост

👍12👏1🫡1

3 Apr 2026, 17:07 UTC235 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Простите ребята что я чутка умер... Сейчас работы не в проворот. Но скорее-всего я перейду в вк, хз хз. Так-что, если вдруг кто хочет следить за моими рисунками там, ставьте плюс, пх 😫 #щитпост

👍14😨3😢2🙏2🫡1😭1

20 Feb 2026, 17:56 UTC324 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ловите стопку хренотени, что я рисовал на протяжении всей тишины в тгк😂 Пока не имею так много сил на творчество, но постараюсь встать на ноги. Всех целую🤩 #скетч

custom 525620183320600680712custom 53435240932012285068custom 52719080604560439446🤣1🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Faulty_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Faulty 👁||16+” (@Faulty_0), 168 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Faulty_0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.