Channel
@FeraqLearn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
870subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001776083305 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FeraqLearn |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FeraqLearn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 870 | +16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 854 | +13 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 841 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 835 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 829 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 829 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🔸 هر چه میخواهی از خدا، بخواه و دهان خود را نبند؛ که تا نگویی چیزی نگیری! امام صادق سلاماللهعلیه فرمودند: دعا کن و نگو که کار از کار گذشته است و آنچه مقدر شده همان شود (دعا اثری ندارد)، همانا نزد خدای عز و جل منزلت و مقامی است که به آن نتوان رسید جز با خواهش و طلبکردن، و اگر بندهای دهان خود را ببندد و درخواست نکند چیزی به او داده نشود، پس درخواست کن تا به تو داده شود! ادْعُ، وَ لاَ تَقُلْ: إِنَّ الاْءَمْرَ قَ…
آیا ملزم کردن افراد به «فقط» دعا کردن برای تعجیل ظهور، خلاف دستورات معصومین علیهمالسلام نیست؟! @Hamidi_Sistani
معمولیترین جوابهایی که از این ابزار میشه گرفت: 📖 @FeraqLearn | #ابزار
🔹 فایل skill تحلیلگر رجالی (نسخه اول) 🔸 تجزیه و تحلیل سند حدیث با هوش مصنوعیِ کلاد 🔗 «آموزش کار با این ابزار» 📖 @FeraqLearn | #ابزار
🔹 تجزیه و تحلیل سند حدیث با Ai 🔸 تجربهنگاری من در کار با ویژگی skill هوش مصنوعی claude در این ویدیو: - مختصراً از روش ساخت اسکیل با پایتون و کلاد گفتم - قابلیت هایی که اسکیلِ «تحلیلگرِ رجال» دارد - نحوهٔ استفاده از اسکیلها (مخصوصا این اسکیل) - چطور در کمتر از پنج دقیقه، کار چند ساعت را به همان دقت انجام دهیم؟! 🔴 «مشاهدهٔ ویدیو در یوتیوب» 🔗 دانلود skill تحلیلگر رجالی (نسخه اول) 📖 @FeraqLearn | #ابزار
حسین کیست؟ همان مردِ جنگجوی صبور که جن و انس و ملک زیرِ دِینِ او رفتند کجاست آنکه به غم، حقِ او ادا کرده؟! که انبیای خدا در غمش فرو رفتند بهشتِ آدم و حواست، روضهخوان حسین فرشتگان همه قربان آن گلو رفتند خدا به عرش بیاویخت کهنهپیرهنی که زیر خیمهاش از پَست تا نکو رفتند نه، با حکومت و فرمان نماند این خیمه که حاکمان همه سرگرم های و هو رفتند چه تختها که شکستند و نامشان گم شد چه تاجها که به تاراجِ رنگ و بو رفتند …
امام سجاد سلاماللهعلیه فرمود: پدرم امام حسین سلاماللهعلیه در راه کربلا، بارها از حضرت یحیی علیهالسلام (پیامبر بنیاسرائیل که سر او را از تن جدا کردند) و احوالات شهادتش یاد میفرمود؛ یک روز فرمود... 📖 @FeraqLearn | #حدیث
نظریۀ قوی (با تحلیل متن نامهها و مدل نقل مورخین) این است که بر خلاف قول مشهور؛ نه تنها شیعیانِ کوفی در میان قتله سیدالشهدا سلاماللهعلیه قرار نگرفتند، بلکه تعدادی از آنها که نامهنوشتند نیز خود را به سپاه حضرت رسانده و در رکاب ایشان به شهادت رسیدند. اما مورخان (که اغلب مسلک فکری اهل سقیفه داشتند) امثال بلاذری، ابناعثم و طبری؛ کوشیدهاند تا با عَلَم کردن اسامی آن دسته از شیعیان که به یاری حضرت نرفتند و در کوفه ماند…
🔸 شیعیان، به منزلۀ اعضای یک پیکرند! امام صادق سلاماللهعلیه فرمودند: مومن، برادر [یا خواهر] مومن است و مانند یک پیکر (بدن) هستند که وقتی عضوی از آن دردمند شود؛ اعضای دیگر بدن نیز، دچار سختی میشوند... عَنْ أَبِي بَصِيرٍ قَالَ سَمِعْتُ أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ع يَقُولُ الْمُؤْمِنُ أَخُو الْمُؤْمِنِ كَالْجَسَدِ الْوَاحِدِ إِنِ اشْتَكَى شَيْئاً مِنْهُ- وَجَدَ أَلَمَ ذَلِكَ فِي سَائِرِ جَسَدِهِ... 📚 الكافي، جلد ۲، صفح…
🔸 روایات مخالفان در فضائل اهلبیت علیهمالسلام ▪️ حدود نقل، خطرهای ترویج، و جایگاه احتجاج • نهی از نقل روایات منفرد اهل تسنن در مناقب اهلبیت علیهمالسلام، با محوریت کلام امام رضا سلاماللهعلیه • نهی از سادهانگاری سیاستهای فریبکارانۀ مخالفین شیعه • بررسی چند نمونه از اعترافات مخالفین یا مناقب ساختگی اهل تسنن برای امیرالمومنین! ❗️ دانستن این مطالب برای هر منبری، صاحبرسانۀ شیعی، و هر کس که گاهی حدیثی برای دیگران…
عزیزانی که مخاطب کانال خصوصی هستند احتمالاً پاسخ این سوال را با دلیل آن میدانند. اما انشاالله در ادامه مقالهای نسبتاً خلاصه در این باره منتشر خواهم کرد...
نقل فضائل و مناقب اهل بیت علیهم السلام از منابع اهل تسنن و مخالفین شیعه، در منابر و رسانههای شیعی صحیح است؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FeraqLearn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
نقل فضائل و مناقب اهل بیت علیهم السلام از منابع اهل تسنن و مخالفین شیعه، در منابر و رسانههای شیعی صحیح است؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموخته های محمد علی حمیدی سیستانی ( فراق )” (@FeraqLearn), 870 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FeraqLearn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.