7 Aug 2026, 00:24 UTC7 viewsread 7 August 2026
أصبحنا نرى بشراً يدوسون على كرامتهم من أجل أن يعيشوا يطلبون الذل مقابل المادة يشربون المهانة ويصمتون من أجل أن لا تنقطع بهم أسباب الحياة. وكأنهم لا يعلمون بأن ما يفعلونه هو موت وليس حياة .. !!
Channel
عربي ساخر .
@Fg_g1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
815subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001372568240 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fg_g1 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fg_g1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 815 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 810 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 813 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 815 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:40 | 809 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 807 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
91 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 46.2% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 27.5% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 8.79% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 3.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 31
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
- Most on one post
- 11
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Fg_g1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
4 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC91 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
تخيلوا معي .. اكتشفت الشرطة الأوروبية في جمهورية لاتيفيا ما يُعرف بـ “مزرعة شرائح SIM” — عبارة عن مكان ضخم يضم مئات الهواتف، وكل هاتف يحتوي على شرائح تُفعَّل بها آلاف الحسابات الوهمية! يديرها ٧ أفراد فقط سبعة أفراد فقط تخيّل أن هذه المزرعة وحدها كانت تُدير أكثر من 49 مليون حساب مزيف تخيلو ٤٩ مليون حساب وهمي !!! تُستخدم هذه الحسابات لخلق رأي عام للترويج لفكر خبيث لنشر الفساد والرذيلة لتشويه كل شي جميل للتلاعب بال…
❤3
1 Aug 2026, 02:21 UTC179 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
إذا وجدت شخصا يبالغ في إظهار ما يعتقد أنها "الوطنية" ويتحدث ليل نهار عنها كأنه محتكرها الوحيد فاعلم أنه على الأقل يداري قلة انشغاله بالمصلحة العامة،إن لم يكن يضر بصالح الوطن، ناسا وأرضا وتاريخا. احذر من يصرخ ويقول طوال الوقت: "أنا وطني"، فالوطنيون الحقيقيون يعملون الصواب في صمت
👏2
29 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC240 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
النصّاب لا يغيّر أخلاقه بتغيّر الساحة أو المساحة؛ فمن احترف النصب في المال، سيحترفه في الحب، وسيجيده في السياسة أيضًا؛ لأنّ المشكلة ليست فيما يسرقه، ولا في من يخدعه، ولا في الوطن الذي يبيعه؛ بل في ضميرٍ مات، فلم يعد يرى في الناس إلاّ فرائس، وفي المشاعر مصالح، وفي الأوطان صفقات !! َ
💯2👏1
25 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC352 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
إن من السهل علينا أن نستورد مصنعاً كاملاً بأجهزته وآلاته، ولكن الصعب هو أن نستورد 'العقلية' التي صممت هذا المصنع وأدارته وطورته. إننا نستطيع شراء التكنولوجيا بأموالنا، ولكننا لا نستطيع شراء العلم؛ لأن العلم منهج في التفكير، وأسلوب في الحياة، وقيمة حضارية لا تباع ولا تشترى."
❤5👍1👏1
21 Jul 2026, 23:46 UTC427 viewsread 7 August 2026
المال زينة الحياة الدنيا وعصبها.. فأما الكريم يضع المال في يده لا في قلبه.. وأما الجشع فيسكن المال قلبه، ولو وضعت في يده كنوز الدنيا كلها..
21 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC803 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
إن الكارثة الكبرى في تعليمنا وإعلامنا هي أننا نلقن الإنسان 'ماذا' يفكر، ولا نعلمه 'كيف' يفكر. نحن نصنع عقولاً حافظة مستوعبة، لا عقولاً ناقدة ومبدعة، ولهذا يسهل اقتياد جماهيرنا بأي شعار عاطفي.
👏3❤1💯1
18 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC483 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
يتعفن عقل المرء عندما يكون منسجماً مع القطيع. تذكرت أقتباس لـ نيتشه يقول فيه : "العقل الحر، الذي لم يتعوّد على تبعيّة أحد، يحدث ضجيجاً في أي مكانٍ يتواجد فيه."
👍1👏1
17 Jul 2026, 03:47 UTC869 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
نحن نعيش بإنفصام غريب؛ نلعن الغرب بألسنتنا ليل نهار، ونتهافت على منتجاته، وعلومنا، وطبنا، وتكنولوجيا حياتنا اليومية بأيدينا. إننا نكره قوته الفكرية والتنظيمية التي أنتجت هذه التكنولجيا، ونعشق الرفاهية التي تمنحنا إياها."
👍4❤2👏1
6 Jul 2026, 02:53 UTC≈1,070 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
المثالية والتملق والوصولية والنفاق واللا مبالاة بمشاعر الآخرين والاستهتار بالمعاناة مهما كان حجمها والتعاطي مع هموم الآخر بفوقية جميعها دروب ظلم للذات وللآخرين معاول هدم الحقيقة وتزييف الواقع وتجميل القبح .. !!
🔥4
1 Jul 2026, 01:52 UTC708 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
لماذا يرتبط مفهوما (العار) و(الشرف)بدائرة ضيقة من القواعد الأخلاقية لماذا لاينظر الناس إلى المرتشي كنظرتهم إلى الساقطة؟ لماذا لايشعر الموظف المرموق بالعار لأنه حصل على وظيفته بالواسطة؟ لماذا يشار بكلمة (ابن ناس) إلى إبن مسؤول استغل نفوذه في تكوين ثروته الحرام .. ؟!!
👍8❤2🔥2👏1
25 Jun 2026, 02:01 UTC765 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
عندما يتقاتل شقيقان حتى الموت ، يرث الغرباء ممتلكاتهم .
👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Fg_g1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
صديقي 𖤍
@friend0i0 · 98,760
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 15 August 2026
@friend0i0 · 98,760
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 15 August 2026
اذكار ادعية اجر لي ولكم 🌿.
@aa_ssz1 · 28,713
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
@aa_ssz1 · 28,713
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عربي ساخر .” (@Fg_g1), 815 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fg_g1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.