В Баку состоится X Международный банковский форум 24–25 ноября 2026 года в Баку пройдет X Международный банковский форум 2026 (IBF 2026) в рамках стратегического партнерства. Форум проводится под девизом «Надежный, безопасный и устойчивый банкинг и технологии» при поддержке Ассоциации банков Азербайджана, Центрального банка Азербайджанской Республики, Министерства цифрового развития и транспорта Азербайджанской Рес…

Channel
FinTech & Retail Eurasia | Финансы, банки, крипто и ритейл
@FinTechRetail
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
10,881subscribers
+51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001981499529 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FinTechRetail |
| Created | 3 August 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FinTechRetail |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 10,881 | +5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:24 | 10,876 | +7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:33 | 10,869 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 10,866 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 10,862 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 10,864 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 10,861 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 10,865 | -23 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 10,888 | -55 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 10,943 | -40 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:39 | 10,983 | -32 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 11,015 | -38 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 11,053 | +249 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 10,804 | +334 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 10,470 | -60 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 10,530 | -44 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 10,574 | -50 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 10,624 | -21 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 10,645 | -22 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 10,667 | first reading |
Engagement
122 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.0%
- avg views ÷ 10,881 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,150
- 101 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.067%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 102
- of 122 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 101 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 122 (4 August 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 318,380 |
| Reactions total | 51 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 19:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
63 reactions across 25 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 19.0% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 7.94% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 6.35% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 122 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 122 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Платежи за регистрацию IMEI в Узбекистане превысили 3 трлн сумов С момента запуска системы UzIMEI в Узбекистане зарегистрировано более 97,8 млн IMEI-кодов мобильных устройств, а общая сумма платежей за регистрацию превысила 3 трлн сумов. Об этом на полях Silk Road Finance & Technology Forum сообщил начальник отдела Республиканского центра управления телекоммуникационными сетями Отабек Азимов. Подробности
1 сентября – День независимости Республики Узбекистан Этот день символизирует свободу и суверенитет Узбекистана, право страны самостоятельно выбирать путь развития и определять свое будущее. За годы независимости Узбекистан прошел большой путь, превратившись в динамично развивающееся государство с яркими успехами во всех сферах жизни. Республика уверенно движется по пути социально-экономического развития, активно у…
ИИ-помощник «Мехрибон» обрабатывает до 65% запросов по соцвыплатам Национальное агентство социальной защиты Узбекистана запустило ИИ-помощника «Мехрибон» совместно с ГРАН и U-BSS. Через номер 1070 он консультирует граждан по детским пособиям, материальной помощи, выплатам по инвалидности и другим соцвыплатам. Система обрабатывает до 65% голосовых и 59% текстовых запросов. В дальнейшем «Мехрибон» планируют интегрир…
Индия и Узбекистан объединят платежные системы UPI и Humo Индия и Узбекистан договорились об объединении своих цифровых платежных систем. Соглашение между международным подразделением индийской платежной экосистемы NPCI International Payments Limited (NIPL) и узбекской системой Humo позволит индийским туристам использовать приложения UPI на территории Узбекистана. Об этом сообщил секретарь МИД Индии по западному нап…
🔥2
В Узбекистане запретили наличные расчёты за товары дороже 176 млн сумов В Узбекистане вступил в силу указ президента, который ограничивает использование наличных денег при оплате товаров и услуг. С 28 августа расчёты на сумму свыше 400 базовых расчётных величин (БРВ) разрешено проводить только безналичным способом — через банковские карты или электронные платёжные системы. Подробности
🔥1
Народный банк лидирует по числу банковских карт в Узбекистане На 1 августа 2026 года в стране в обращении находилось 75,7 млн банковских карт. Больше всего выпустил Народный банк — 12,1 млн карт. Далее идут Uzum Bank — 7,2 млн и Агробанк — 6,8 млн. Всего в Узбекистане установлено 453,5 тыс. POS-терминалов и 47 тыс. банкоматов и инфокиосков. По числу терминалов лидирует Хамкорбанк — 68,3 тыс., а по банкоматам и инфо…
Сэм Альтман допустил появление AGI у OpenAI до конца 2026 года Глава OpenAI Сэм Альтман заявил, что компания может создать систему уровня общего искусственного интеллекта (AGI) до конца 2026 года. По его словам, OpenAI пока не достигла этого уровня. Одним из ключевых направлений станет Astra — семейство моделей для создания автономных ИИ-агентов. Альтман рассчитывает, что они смогут самостоятельно выполнять сложные…
Прибыль банков Казахстана снизилась на 14,9% По итогам января–июля прибыль банковского сектора сократилась на 14,9% год к году. Рост показали только 8 из 23 банков. В топ-10 прибыль увеличили лишь: ▪️ «Отбасы банк» — +34%, до 99,9 млрд тенге ▪️ «Фридом банк» — до 22,3 млрд тенге против убытка годом ранее ▪️ Home Credit Bank — +3,6%, до 26,6 млрд тенге. Без учета разового эффекта Alatau City Bank крупнейшее падение…
ЦБ утвердил переводы между счетами по номеру телефона Центральный банк Узбекистана утвердил правила переводов между счетами физлиц через Систему мгновенных платежей. Для перевода по модели A2A можно будет использовать привязанный к банковскому счету номер телефона. К одному счету разрешается привязать только один номер. Переводы будут доступны через мобильные приложения и отделения банков в режиме 24/7 и реального …
IT Park Ventures инвестировал в узбекский стартап DOMO IT Park Ventures вложился в DOMO — цифровой сервис для оплаты и управления коммунальными услугами. Об инвестиции объявили в рамках Silk Road Finance & Technology Forum. В DOMO зарегистрировано более 2,3 млн пользователей, ежемесячная аудитория составляет 1,5 млн, ежедневная — около 700 тыс. Привлеченные средства направят на развитие продукта, расширение географ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 122 posts we hold for @FinTechRetail. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@FinTechRetail edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 25 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 25 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что, на ваш взгляд, должно быть главным условием для распространения агентных платежей?
- Максимальная безопасность69%
- Возможность пользователя контролировать каждую операцию59%
- Жесткие лимиты на суммы и категории покупок21%
- Понятные правила ответственности за ошибки ИИ52%
- Государственное регулирование21%
- Все перечисленное24%
The shares total 246%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Каковы самые критичные последствия инцидентов с Wildberries для рынка электронной коммерции?
- Происходит отток селлеров и покупателей в пользу других крупнейших маркетплейсов41%
- Усилия недружественных стран пока не достигают своей цели0%
- Меняется подход участников рынка к оценке рисков18%
- Селлеры распределяют запасы товара между Wildberries, Ozon, независимыми складами и т. п.18%
- Растет роль зарубежных складских мощностей Wildberries, включая рынки стран Центральной Азии35%
- Самые критичные последствия еще впереди35%
- Затрудняюсь ответить12%
The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 122 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FinTech & Retail Eurasia | Финансы, банки, крипто и ритейл” (@FinTechRetail), 10,881 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FinTechRetail.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.