Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FINN’s Gems Calls

Channel

FINN’s Gems Calls

@FinnGemCalls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,156subscribers

-339 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001395692138
TypeChannel
Username@FinnGemCalls
CreatedBetween 1 June 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FinnGemCalls

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,1562,4952,325.57 August 2026 — 2,495 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,495 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,494 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,491 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,484 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,481 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,483 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,461 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,412 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,367 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,307 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,242 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,205 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,156 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -339. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,105–2,546 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:162,156-49
14 Sept 2026, 13:382,205-37
11 Sept 2026, 01:562,242-65
6 Sept 2026, 10:152,307-60
1 Sept 2026, 21:172,367-45
30 Aug 2026, 00:272,412-49
27 Aug 2026, 07:082,461-22
24 Aug 2026, 13:082,483+2
20 Aug 2026, 17:272,481-3
18 Aug 2026, 00:242,484-7
14 Aug 2026, 22:472,491-3
8 Aug 2026, 11:582,494-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:332,495no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:522,495first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

229 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11851.5%
👍5323.1%
💅219.17%
🔥156.55%
🥰146.11%
🐳62.62%
🤮20.873%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 229 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2025 to 12 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Nov 2025, 15:14 UTC≈2,600 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Looks like Crash loves what i said https://x.com/traderfinn0/status/1987901079527506335?s=46

33💅1

12 Nov 2025, 15:13 UTC≈2,480 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

💅12👍2

10 Nov 2025, 19:13 UTC≈3,660 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Q4 end should be good with this happening send it

13💅2

10 Nov 2025, 19:12 UTC≈3,950 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @trad_fin

*SENATORS HAVE REACHED A DEAL TO END THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN: POLITICO

23

10 Nov 2025, 15:02 UTC≈2,510 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

hasn’t mentioned $ASTER here but time to get your money into right places i don’t think CZ has stopped yet , the amt of time he invested into this aster shit is crazy and made a memecoin meta around it make sure you have enough memes on BSC if you wanna be on win cycle ASTER will performance good once memes starts to performe well in whole chains ETH SOL BNB put your eyes on ASTER right now won’t regret still be

32🐳6🥰3💅1

10 Nov 2025, 14:40 UTC≈2,100 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bidded some NFTs during this week and starting to show some momentum UPPPPPP szn soon

👍11🥰5

10 Nov 2025, 14:32 UTC≈1,900 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

not many “realize” this all shit is true said by wale we’all bought the top and gave them monieeeeeee

👍7💅52

10 Nov 2025, 14:30 UTC≈1,930 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/waleswoosh/status/1987790544236679648?s=46

👍1

10 Nov 2025, 14:13 UTC≈1,910 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

these past few months have been hard for everyone of us i’ve had definitely huge losses across this year which made be lose motivation to do anything anymore happens along with the cycle but the thing is its just not me it is many of us around So its really about if you wanna giveup or do wanna get up Many projects dms me still to push around and fuck with them but hasn’t had real thing to get along with Market

11🥰6👍2

3 Nov 2025, 20:13 UTC≈10,800 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuruPhoto

JUST IN: Odds of Bitcoin falling under $100,000 this month rise to 52% on Polymarket. @WatcherGuru

3 Nov 2025, 13:04 UTC≈5,970 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

bro said china is getting very big into bitcoin should better say into gold LMAO

👍8

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @FinnGemCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FINN’s Gems Calls” (@FinnGemCalls), 2,156 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FinnGemCalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.