ما أشبه الأمس باليوم!

Channel
فقه الاقتصاد والمال
@Fiqh_Economy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,601subscribers
+25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001291260156 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fiqh_Economy |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fiqh_Economy |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 5,601 | +7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 5,594 | +13 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 5,581 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:44 | 5,584 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 5,587 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 5,586 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 5,582 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 5,583 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 5,585 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 5,581 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 5,575 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 5,576 | first reading |
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 51 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 30.0% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
قَالُوا يَا مُوسَىٰ إِنَّا لَن نَّدْخُلَهَا أَبَدًا مَّا دَامُوا فِيهَا ۖ فَاذْهَبْ أَنتَ وَرَبُّكَ فَقَاتِلَا إِنَّا هَاهُنَا قَاعِدُونَ (24)
Listen to سورة المائدة الشيخ السيد سعيد. by تلاوات للشيخ سيد سعيد on #SoundCloud https://on.soundcloud.com/t9YjHAZhr1SMHLJNRU
https://youtu.be/q4qLUxdaTEs?si=7dacE9_hZQdkDE_g
https://youtu.be/2Ynw07XUMsM?si=zWlHDPWmCM1ptDX8
مقدمة تأسيسية: كتاب مقاصد الشريعة المتعلقة بالمال محاضرة واجبات المجتمع المسلم اقتصاديا لقاء التناول القرآني للمال والدنيا (إختياري) ٢) مدخل إلى علم الاقتصاد: كتاب الرأسمالية: مقدمة قصيرة جدا سلسلة قصة المال كتاب الاقتصاد كما أشرحه لابنتي (يفضل شراءه ورقي) كتاب ٢٣ حقيقة يخفونها عنك بخصوص الرأسمالية كتاب دليل المسترشد إلى علم الاقتصاد ورقي (اختياري)
كثرت الأسئلة حول رحلة فهم الاقتصاد العالمي: من الرأسمالية إلى الاقتصاد الإسلامي، وأين وصلنا فيها، وكيف يمكن الانضمام إليها. إن شاء الله، نحن حاليًا في الدفعة الأولى والثانية، وقد وصلنا إلى نهاية آخر كتاب في المقرر الثاني: المدخل إلى علم الاقتصاد. بدأنا أولًا بالمقرر الأول، وهو مقدمة تأسيسية في مقاصد الشريعة للمال، ثم شرعنا في المقرر الثاني: المدخل إلى علم الاقتصاد. وبعد الانتهاء من المقرر الثاني، إن شاء الله، سيتم…
اليوم فقط تكلفة منهج دورة رحلة فهم الاقتصاد العالمي من الرأسمالية إلى الاقتصاد الإسلامي ٢٠٠ جنيه مصري منهج للدراسة الذاتية لمدة ٩ أشهر للحصول عليه برجاء إرسال رسالة مباشرة http://t.me/Fiqh_Economy?direct
٥) كل مجيب إجابة صحيحة سيحصل على خصم ٥٠% على منهج دورة رحلة فهم الاقتصاد العالمي من الرأسمالية إلى الاقتصاد الإسلامي أي مما يلي يصف النظام المصرفي الحديث بشكل أدق؟ أ) البنوك تحفظ الأموال فقط ب) البنوك تقرض فقط من الودائع الموجودة ج) البنوك تخلق جزءًا كبيرًا من النقود عبر الإقراض د) البنوك لا تؤثر على كمية النقود
٤) كل مجيب إجابة صحيحة سيحصل على خصم ٥٠% على منهج دورة رحلة فهم الاقتصاد العالمي من الرأسمالية إلى الاقتصاد الإسلامي كيف تُخلق أغلب النقود في الاقتصاد الحديث؟ أ) طباعة نقد من البنك المركزي فقط ب) من خلال القروض التي تمنحها البنوك ج) من الضرائب د) من التجارة الدولية
فقه الاقتصاد والمال pinned «📚 منهج رحلة فهم الاقتصاد العالمي: من الرأسمالية إلى الاقتصاد الإسلامي هذا المنهج لم يُبنَ على أساس جمع مجموعة من الكتب والمصادر، وإنما هو رحلة علمية متدرجة لفهم الاقتصاد من جذوره؛ بدايةً من التأسيس المقاصدي والفكري، مرورًا بتاريخ الفكر الاقتصادي، والنظام…»
📚 منهج رحلة فهم الاقتصاد العالمي: من الرأسمالية إلى الاقتصاد الإسلامي هذا المنهج لم يُبنَ على أساس جمع مجموعة من الكتب والمصادر، وإنما هو رحلة علمية متدرجة لفهم الاقتصاد من جذوره؛ بدايةً من التأسيس المقاصدي والفكري، مرورًا بتاريخ الفكر الاقتصادي، والنظام الاقتصادي والنقدي العالمي، ونقد الاقتصاد المعاصر، وصولًا إلى الاقتصاد والتمويل والتكافل الإسلامي. وقد تم اختيار الكتب والمحاضرات والأبحاث والبودكاست داخل المنهج بع…
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @Fiqh_Economy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
٩٥% من الدولار المتداول في النظام النقدي العالمي المعاصر:
- ورقي41%
- رقمي59%
- مغطى بالذهب0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@basemelewa · 30,008
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@BnSamyPosts · 62,761
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@Economic_100 · 29,197
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 September 2026
@mostvision · 28,698
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
@HMAskills · 24,845
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 15 September 2026
@Saicohat · 24,794
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 15 September 2026
@JANNAH2015 · 46,534
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
@MMohey1 · 41,552
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
@HRM2017 · 23,586
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
@brufennyabat · 24,303
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 September 2026
@Ahmed_Elashmawy00 · 37,821
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
@asrawyfel3yadachannel · 32,209
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
@dryoussefmohsen · 33,127
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
@Aware_Bootcamp · 47,975
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فقه الاقتصاد والمال” (@Fiqh_Economy), 5,601 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fiqh_Economy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.