Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
21.9 average views per post against 62,999 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.035%. Across the 24,202 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,996 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.60% and 15.0%, with a median of 6.80%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (30 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Posts measured
600 of 600 published in the window (600 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
13,131
Mature posts only
0.058% over 55 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 29 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net -4,065. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,389–67,674 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 17:41
62,999
-116
19 Sept 2026, 15:37
63,115
-74
17 Sept 2026, 02:19
63,189
-90
15 Sept 2026, 04:19
63,279
-36
13 Sept 2026, 11:37
63,315
-64
11 Sept 2026, 18:37
63,379
-62
9 Sept 2026, 08:54
63,441
-721
5 Sept 2026, 22:20
64,162
-961
3 Sept 2026, 18:15
65,123
-653
2 Sept 2026, 11:05
65,776
-27
1 Sept 2026, 14:35
65,803
-22
31 Aug 2026, 18:08
65,825
-225
30 Aug 2026, 14:57
66,050
-36
29 Aug 2026, 16:05
66,086
-41
28 Aug 2026, 14:54
66,127
-12
27 Aug 2026, 17:37
66,139
-17
26 Aug 2026, 16:06
66,156
-20
25 Aug 2026, 13:29
66,176
-41
24 Aug 2026, 13:05
66,217
-31
22 Aug 2026, 20:49
66,248
first reading
Engagement
1,045 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 109 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.035%
avg views ÷ 62,999 subscribers
Avg views / post
21.9
600 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
600
of 1,045 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 600 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
1,045 (7 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
13,131
Reactions total
4
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 15:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,500
Videos
≈1,800
Links
≈2,380
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11h 18m
Average length
8m 29s
Measured directly from 80 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7
87.5%
👍
1
12.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Gold-Beben bei 5 % Zinsen: Doch China kauft wie nie zuvor!
🚨 Gold-Beben oder Kaufchance? 🥇 Während der Goldpreis wegen 5%-Zinsen & starkem Dollar auf 4.244 $ abrutschte, kauft China wie nie zuvor – über 1.000 Tonnen allein bis August! 📈🇨🇳
Gleichzeitig kürzen Minen wie Shandong Gold & Kinross ihre Förderziele, Kosten explodieren und Staaten greifen zu (Burkina Faso, Russland 👀).
🔍💰
USA & China: „Kein einziger chinesischer Konzernchef beim Staatsdinner im Weißen Haus!"
🟠 Während US-Techgrößen den Saal füllten, schickte Peking fast nur Regierungsvertreter – ein Zeichen anhaltender Spannungen.
Was geschehen ist:
• Gäste: Unter über 130 Teilnehmern kamen weniger als 20 aus China – kein einziger CEO
• Kontrast: Im Mai brachte Trump Musk und den damaligen Apple-Chef Cook nach Peking
• Ergebnis: Der…
Capital B kauft 13 Bitcoin, Bestand steigt auf 3.538 BTC
Die Pariser Bitcoin-Treasury-Firma Capital B hat 13 Bitcoin für 0,97 Mio. Euro gekauft, zu einem Durchschnittspreis von 74.364 Euro. Der Gesamtbestand steigt damit auf 3.538 BTC. Finanziert wurde der Kauf über eine Kapitalerhöhung beim Vermögensverwalter TOBAM zu 5,68 Euro je Aktie.
Seit Jahresbeginn erzielte das Unternehmen eine „BTC Yield" von 2,20 Prozent.…
Ric Edelman: „Ein bis zwei Prozent Bitcoin sind viel zu wenig!"
🟠 Der Gründer von Edelman Financial Engines bekräftigt seine Forderung nach deutlich höheren Krypto-Anteilen im Depot.
Seine Einschätzung:
• Aussage: 1 bis 2% Krypto seien „bei Weitem nicht ausreichend"
• Modell: 10% für Vorsichtige, 25% für Ausgewogene, bis 40% für Risikofreudige
• Begründung: Das klassische **60/40**-Depot hält er für überholt
📌 Neu…
🗝️ Wahrer Wohlstand ist Freiheit und Freiheit beginnt mit dem Verständnis des Potenzials von Bitcoin-Investitionen.
Regierungen drucken. Banken kontrollieren. Inflation entwertet. Aber Bitcoin operiert außerhalb dieses Systems grenzenlos, knapp und unaufhaltsam.
Ich helfe zukunftsorientierten Investoren, ihre finanzielle Souveränität durch Strategie, Weitsicht und Disziplin zurückzugewinnen.
📩 Deine finanzielle Be…
Strategy: „1.665 Bitcoin gekauft – alle Verkäufe des Jahres zurückgeholt!"
🟠 Mit dem jüngsten Kauf übertrifft Saylors Firma ihren bisherigen Rekordbestand aus dem Juni.
Die Eckdaten:
• Zukauf: 1.665 BTC für 142,7 Mio. $ – Schnitt 85.681 $ je Coin
• Bestand: 847.666 BTC – neuer Höchststand, Einstand bei 75.437 $
• Ranking: Platz 1 weltweit – über 4% des gesamten Bitcoin-Angebots
📌 Finanziert wurde der Kauf diesmal …
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,045 posts we hold for @Flaviovonwitzleben_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Flavio von Witzleben” (@Flaviovonwitzleben_0), 62,999 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Flaviovonwitzleben_0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
