Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 👑 Jesus Christus unser Fliegenpilzmessias 🍄❤️ die Wahrheit

Channel

👑 Jesus Christus unser Fliegenpilzmessias 🍄❤️ die Wahrheit

@Fliegenpil

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,134subscribers

-84 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001243620305
TypeChannel
Username@Fliegenpil
DescriptionDas Urwissen _Übereinstimmungen mit dem heiligen 🍄
Created14 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Fliegenpil

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,1288,2188,1736 August 2026 — 8,218 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,218 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,216 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,212 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,210 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,207 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,204 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,193 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,183 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,180 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,173 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,161 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,147 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,148 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,141 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,128 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,139 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,143 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,149 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,150 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,145 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,144 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,142 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,140 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,134 subscribers8,1346 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,115–8,232 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 08:068,134-6
2 Nov 2026, 04:288,140-2
30 Oct 2026, 14:268,142-2
27 Oct 2026, 04:378,144-1
24 Oct 2026, 04:368,145-5
21 Oct 2026, 07:198,150+1
18 Oct 2026, 09:158,149+6
14 Oct 2026, 23:118,143+4
11 Oct 2026, 11:358,139+11
5 Oct 2026, 11:008,128-13
27 Sept 2026, 07:368,141-7
17 Sept 2026, 21:188,148+1
13 Sept 2026, 09:198,147-14
9 Sept 2026, 03:158,161-12
3 Sept 2026, 22:218,173-7
31 Aug 2026, 13:038,180-3
28 Aug 2026, 07:558,183-10
25 Aug 2026, 00:278,193-11
21 Aug 2026, 01:348,204-3
18 Aug 2026, 11:068,207first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.8%
avg views ÷ 8,134 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,340
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.855%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held21 (5 August 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total7,020
Reactions total60
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 12:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,500
Videos
≈839
Links
≈392

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 19m
Average length
13m 15s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

510 reactions across 21 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13025.5%
❤11021.6%
🥰5410.6%
💯458.82%
😍448.63%
🔥356.86%
❤‍🔥224.31%
🙏112.16%
🤪81.57%
🍾61.18%
🏆61.18%
🗿61.18%
😱61.18%
🤓61.18%
👏40.784%
😢40.784%
🍓30.588%
⚡20.392%
✍20.392%
🙈20.392%
3 further kinds40.784%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 510 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

22 Oct 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,720 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026

KAPPAROT Kappa rot 🍄 Missinterpretation der Juden, andererseits: kappe Papa rot 🍄 cap parrot, der parrot wäre in diesem Fall der Papagei oder Vogel, damals galten dem Fliegenpilz, da er ein Flieger ist Vogelanspielungen, der Papagei kann auch ein rotes Gefieder besitzen, welches damals schon dem Pilz möglicherweise imponiert hatte. Die Juden verstehen deshalb darunter das Huhn/Vogel zu kappen, also dem Huhn die Ke…

💯7❤5🔥2👍1

22 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,810 views25 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

@unzensiert_infoseite Opferungen sind nicht mehr im Sinne Gottes. Er gab seinen Sohn Jesus. Es ist vollbracht. Hosea 6,6 besagt: „Denn an der Liebe habe ich Gefallen und nicht am Opfer, an der Erkenntnis Gottes mehr als am Brandopfer“ (Lutherbibel). Bedeutung des Verses • Wahre Hingabe: Gott wünscht sich eine echte Beziehung und echtes Mitgefühl von den Menschen. • Mehr als Rituale: Äußerliche Opfer und Traditione…

👍9😱6😢4❤3🔥1🗿1🤯1

12 Oct 2026, 15:46 UTC≈3,490 views20 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Wie [sie] die Welt regieren. Mit Blackrock & Vanguard als Proxys... Dieses Video sollte jeder gesehen haben. Dieses informative Video gibt in weniger als 1 Stunde einen Überblick über das, was derzeit in der Welt geschieht. Es zeigt die modernen globalen Systeme und ihren Einfluss auf alle Branchen über institutionelle Großinvestoren. Das Video passt zeitlich zu den drastischen Menschenrechtsverletzungen / Grundre…

👍9💯6❤4🙈1

7 Oct 2026, 11:10 UTC≈3,140 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026

So wurde zum Beispiel auch aus dem Urdeutschen/Germanischen ᚷᚨᚱᛞᛟᚾᚨᛉ - Gardonaz das Althochdeutsche; Gardinus das -az/-iz wurde durch die lateinische Indoktrination in das Germanenreich in -us umgewandelt. zum jüdisch/hebräisch eingekürzten: גַּן naG Gardon-iz/-az Urdeutsch Ga(rdo)n(iz) Jüdisch/Hebr. Die Araber und Perser würden das Wort "Gan" auch verstehen. Sie nutzen aber ein anderes Wort für Garten.

👍11❤6

7 Oct 2026, 10:07 UTC≈3,280 views28 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Also nicht von Deutschland, denn das Wort "Deutschland" wie wir wissen ist jünger, die Bezeichnung selbst wurde natürlich von "Theodisc" bzw. "teutonisc" abgeleitet, was wesentlich älter ist (und sowohl "deutlich"/"klar" und "Volk" bedeutet), also genauer wäre, "Angeln" und "Sachsen" haben den Namen Angelland/England begründet, also Nord-Westgermanen, die Angelsächsisch also Altanglisch/Altenglisch sprachen. Aus dies…

👍11💯6❤‍🔥5👏3✍2😁1

3 Oct 2026, 16:03 UTC≈2,390 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤7🏆5🥰3

3 Oct 2026, 16:03 UTC≈2,960 views66 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

... haben wir eine Nudelpfanne gemacht 😊 Band Nudeln + Spirale Nudeln Creme frisch + bisschen Sahne Zwiebeln, zwei Knoblauchzehen in ein wenig Butter angebratene Krause Glucke Rosmarin + Thymian + Petersilie + Majoran Pfeffer und Salz Muskatnuss mehr ist es nicht, aber war sehr lecker 😋

❤23🥰22😍10🍾6🤪3🔥2

3 Oct 2026, 16:03 UTC≈2,250 views21 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Und aus diesem hübschen Exemplar (Krause Glucke)...

😍10❤3❤‍🔥3👍3🏆1🔥1

3 Oct 2026, 16:02 UTC≈3,080 views29 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

So sieht ein vergammelter Apfel im Übrigen aus, der Apfel aus dem Garten Eden war ein 🍄

❤12👍9🤓5🔥3

3 Oct 2026, 16:01 UTC≈2,090 views13 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰7❤3🔥3

3 Oct 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,950 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥14🔥2🥰1

3 Oct 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,980 views35 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😍20❤12🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Fliegenpil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🏛TEMPEL DER AHNEN🏛
@tempelderahnen · 21,519
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“👑 Jesus Christus unser Fliegenpilzmessias 🍄❤️ die Wahrheit” (@Fliegenpil), 8,134 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fliegenpil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.