Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Семейство Флюгеровых

Channel

Семейство Флюгеровых

@Flugerovs

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

103,669subscribers

+1,377 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001657832155
TypeChannel
Username@Flugerovs
DescriptionПо рекламе - @FlugerSupport Я (флюгер) - @FlugerOld Заработай на Нарезках - @flugertt Конфиги Флюгера - https://funpay.com/users/4569399/ Ускоритель - @Fluger_Vpn_bot Обойти Баны (прокси) - @FlugerProxy_bot Чат - @flugerovsreal
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Flugerovs

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

102,292105,086103,6897 August 2026 — 102,292 subscribers7 August 2026 — 102,292 subscribers7 August 2026 — 102,322 subscribers8 August 2026 — 102,361 subscribers9 August 2026 — 102,478 subscribers10 August 2026 — 103,001 subscribers11 August 2026 — 103,195 subscribers12 August 2026 — 103,301 subscribers14 August 2026 — 103,677 subscribers15 August 2026 — 103,733 subscribers16 August 2026 — 103,811 subscribers17 August 2026 — 103,784 subscribers18 August 2026 — 103,770 subscribers19 August 2026 — 103,723 subscribers20 August 2026 — 103,821 subscribers22 August 2026 — 104,312 subscribers23 August 2026 — 104,632 subscribers25 August 2026 — 104,747 subscribers26 August 2026 — 104,877 subscribers27 August 2026 — 104,956 subscribers28 August 2026 — 104,994 subscribers28 August 2026 — 105,050 subscribers30 August 2026 — 105,054 subscribers30 August 2026 — 105,086 subscribers31 August 2026 — 104,947 subscribers1 September 2026 — 104,851 subscribers2 September 2026 — 104,784 subscribers4 September 2026 — 104,660 subscribers6 September 2026 — 104,559 subscribers9 September 2026 — 104,228 subscribers12 September 2026 — 104,023 subscribers14 September 2026 — 103,845 subscribers15 September 2026 — 103,615 subscribers18 September 2026 — 103,669 subscribers103,6697 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,377. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 101,873–105,505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:20103,669+54
15 Sept 2026, 20:37103,615-230
14 Sept 2026, 02:19103,845-178
12 Sept 2026, 06:01104,023-205
9 Sept 2026, 22:22104,228-331
6 Sept 2026, 12:02104,559-101
4 Sept 2026, 03:36104,660-124
2 Sept 2026, 16:07104,784-67
1 Sept 2026, 18:05104,851-96
31 Aug 2026, 20:24104,947-139
30 Aug 2026, 23:46105,086+32
30 Aug 2026, 00:28105,054+4
28 Aug 2026, 22:17105,050+56
28 Aug 2026, 00:25104,994+38
27 Aug 2026, 03:33104,956+79
26 Aug 2026, 02:08104,877+130
25 Aug 2026, 02:46104,747+115
23 Aug 2026, 19:23104,632+320
22 Aug 2026, 02:19104,312+491
20 Aug 2026, 21:45103,821first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.7%
avg views ÷ 103,669 subscribers
Avg views / post
23,500
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 43 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held83 (30 July 202621 September 2026)
Views total1,033,720
Reactions total22,829
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 03:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
666
Videos
114
Links
625

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
58s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

53,457 reactions across 78 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 527384329111524932252,32997.9%
custom 51976646415970627641,1282.11%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53,457 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4,871
across the posts below
Posts paid on
82
of 83 we hold a reading for · 99%
Most on one post
1,060
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Flugerovs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 83 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 20:50 UTC≈3,480 views0 reactions11 Starsread 22 September 2026

время летит пиздец быстро парни я надеюсь вы с меня берете только хорошее, не пытайтесь повторять за мной к алко вообще не притрагивайтесь

21 Sept 2026, 20:48 UTC≈3,870 views0 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

20 Sept 2026, 14:37 UTC≈12,800 views777 reactions20 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🍁

custom 5197664641597062764777

20 Sept 2026, 12:58 UTC≈16,200 views147 reactions4 Starsread 22 September 2026

Лучшее ТРИО с НУРБЕКОМ и ОБЛОМОМ на Анархии в Майнкрафт! https://youtu.be/pLhg_jyngrM

custom 5197664641597062764147

17 Sept 2026, 13:48 UTC≈17,700 views204 reactions31 Starsread 22 September 2026

Я Стал АДМИНОМ на REALLYWORLD и ПОПАЛ В ролик ДОМЕРА! https://youtu.be/UMc8HGwkoLE

custom 5197664641597062764204

16 Sept 2026, 22:21 UTC≈20,400 views854 reactions22 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🍁

custom 5273843291115249322854

15 Sept 2026, 14:14 UTC≈22,700 views619 reactions7 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5273843291115249322619

15 Sept 2026, 12:49 UTC≈22,400 views233 reactions4 Starsread 22 September 2026

ВИДОС С ДОМЕРОМ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81CorIMA6zg

custom 5273843291115249322233

14 Sept 2026, 00:31 UTC≈24,000 views663 reactions515 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🤫

custom 5273843291115249322663

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @Flugerovs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@Flugerovs edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Семейство Флюгеровых” (@Flugerovs), 103,669 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Flugerovs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.