Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FolkPatch

Channel

FolkPatch

@FolkPatch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,517subscribers

+914 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003417958683
TypeChannel
Username@FolkPatch
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FolkPatch

Growth

9,60310,51710,0606 August 2026 — 9,603 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,624 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,762 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,872 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,023 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,075 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,119 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,138 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,193 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,245 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,291 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,304 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,340 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,360 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,370 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,407 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,438 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,451 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,470 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,501 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,517 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
21 measurements spanning 28 days, net +914. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,466–10,654 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 04:3910,517+16
2 Sept 2026, 18:3610,501+31
1 Sept 2026, 17:3410,470+19
31 Aug 2026, 14:3710,451+13
30 Aug 2026, 14:1510,438+31
29 Aug 2026, 17:2510,407+37
28 Aug 2026, 14:3410,370+10
27 Aug 2026, 12:5810,360+20
26 Aug 2026, 15:5310,340+36
25 Aug 2026, 14:3410,304+13
24 Aug 2026, 13:0310,291+46
22 Aug 2026, 23:2910,245+52
21 Aug 2026, 12:4610,193+55
20 Aug 2026, 11:4710,138+19
19 Aug 2026, 14:2710,119+44
18 Aug 2026, 13:1310,075+52
17 Aug 2026, 15:2810,023+151
14 Aug 2026, 05:369,872+110
10 Aug 2026, 21:319,762+138
7 Aug 2026, 12:279,624first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.6%
avg views ÷ 10,517 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,950
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.493%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held39 (31 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total124,960
Reactions total616
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

900 reactions across 39 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
39944.3%
👍38442.7%
🔥283.11%
👏262.89%
🥰161.78%
😱121.33%
😍70.778%
😐70.778%
👀50.556%
🥴50.556%
🏆30.333%
🤔30.333%
🌭20.222%
🤷‍♂20.222%
🤨10.111%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 900 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC≈1,810 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026

4.19等非GKI谨慎更新,APatch群爆出兼容性问题 4.19 and other non-GKI kernels require cautious updates; APatch group reports compatibility issues.

13😱7👍1

28 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC≈1,990 views18 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

kp: bump to 0.13.6 init support 6.18 & fix some bugs

16👍1🥰1

26 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC≈2,720 views48 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://github.com/LyraVoid/Shirone 帮我给我的新项目点一下Star Please help me give my new project a Star

👍3512😱1

21 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC≈5,630 views23 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍184🥰1

21 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC≈5,080 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @magiskalphaFile

无法规避的Magisk识别方案已经公开:https://github.com/eltavine/Duck-Detector-Refactoring/pull/22 检测方法说明和概念验证app:https://github.com/LSPosed/DirtySepolicy

8

21 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC≈6,070 views33 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

1.新增SElinux隐藏功能,落地到了常规-隐藏SElinux选项(实现性API) 2.废除自动加载KPM的功能,改用一个叫做安装的新概念,他会比旧版的自动加载KPM更加可靠 3.修复部分FolkPatch KP HOOK功能无法在开机启动的问题 1. Add SElinux hidden feature, implemented in the conventional - hidden SElinux option (implementation API) 2. Remove the automatic loading of KPM function, and replace it with a new concept called installation, which is more reliable than the old automatic loading of KPM 3. Fix the issue where

23🔥3😱3🌭2👀1👍1

20 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈4,630 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026

目前只会同步上游代码但是不发版,等待稳定

👍154🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈7,890 views48 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

内核升级 KernelPatch 0.13.5,修复 4.x 老内核热补丁失败/无法启动的问题 补丁流程重构:初始化更可靠,失败自动重试,不再出现"卡住"状态 修复手动刷机后 ori.img 迁移失效的问题(更新前该功能其实从未生效) Shizuku 日志页全新 M3e 界面,顶部按钮收进菜单,更简洁 语言设置:显示 app 自己的语言名(如"简体中文"),选择后立即生效 底层加固:修补 su、模块安装、配置解析等多个安全漏洞 Kernel update KernelPatch 0.13.5, fixing the issues with hot patching failing/not booting on 4.x old kernels Patch process restructured: more reliable initialization, automatic retry on failure, no "stuck

👍3017🥰1

15 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC≈8,030 views51 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

FolkPatch v115020 更新日志 - 新增:内置 Shizuku 服务端日志功能,可查看/搜索/导出/清空服务端日志与 logcat,支持跨重启排查(入口:Shizuku 授权页) - 改进:设置页组件交互与视觉效果优化(Surface 材质化、主题色涟漪反馈、combinedClickable) - 同步:KernelPatch 升级至 0.13.4(新增 selinux_hide/策略增强、修复新内核兼容与稳定性问题) - 同步:APatch 主线三个提交(kp 版本同步、重建触发) - 翻译:Shizuku 日志功能全部文案补齐 17 种语言/中文变体 - 其他:应用版本号 115019 → 115020 FolkPatch v115020 Update Log - Added: Built-in Shizuku server log function, allowing viewing/searching/e

23👍23👏4🤔1

14 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC≈5,570 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Recently, I've been working on a new project, and may not be updating as frequently. 最近在维护新项目,可能少更新

20🥰6👀4

10 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC≈7,780 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026

我替换了一个版本,请下载115019 I replaced a version, please download 115019

👍185😍3😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @FolkPatch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FolkPatch” (@FolkPatch), 10,517 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FolkPatch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.