Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کلاهبرداری های فارکسی

Channel

کلاهبرداری های فارکسی

@Forex_Fraud

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,309subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001118050223
TypeChannel
Username@Forex_Fraud
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Forex_Fraud

Growth

3,3093,3143,311.523 August 2026 — 3,311 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,311 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,314 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,312 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,309 subscribers23 August 20262 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,308–3,315 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 10:583,309-3
27 Aug 2026, 10:383,312-2
24 Aug 2026, 17:163,314+3
23 Aug 2026, 07:153,311no change
23 Aug 2026, 07:003,311first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 48s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

472 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍29662.7%
👎10422.0%
7215.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 472 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC≈1,000 views15 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video

شاید باورتون نشه یه کلیپ مثل این گذاشتم صفحه اینستاگرام با تکست نوشتم این ها کلاهبرداری هست باور نکنید رفتم دیدم یه سری کلمه کامنت گذاشتن 😐😐😐😐😐😐😐

👍132

19 May 2026, 21:38 UTC≈2,310 views13 reactionsread 23 August 2026

این کلیپ رو یادتون هست ؟👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆

👍13

19 May 2026, 21:37 UTC≈1,770 views13 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @webamoozirPhoto

⭕️ بررسی کلاهبرداری جدید علی مهدی نژاد (آرش آنالیسیس) با مدیریت سرمایه قربانی به بروکرهای بی نام و نشان با وعده همیشگی سود! این بروکرها عمدتا توسط خود این افراد اداره میشود و هیچ رگولاتوری ندارند. قبلا کلاهبرداری دیگری از وی مستند شده است #مارول_ترید 🆔 @Webamoozir

7👍6

11 May 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,190 viewsread 23 August 2026

با میرا آشنا شو — دستیار هوش مصنوعی شخصی تو 🤖 متن: کدنویسی، تحقیق، یا فقط یه گپ هوشمند می‌خوای؟ میرا کمکت می‌کنه! ✅ کد بنویس و باگ پیدا کن ✅ تصویر و موزیک بساز ✅ هر موضوعی رو تحقیق کن ✅ فوری جواب بگیر روی لینک زیر کلیک کن و رایگان امتحان کن: 🔗 t.me/mira?start=_tgr_ZCIRfi1jMGRk 👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆

4 May 2026, 11:07 UTC≈2,610 views12 reactionsread 23 August 2026

امروز با پلیس فتا تماس گرفتم و گزارش دزدی ها رو دادم و پیشنهاد دادم یه هشدار بدن به کسانی که اینجوری دارن کلاهبرداری میکنن گفت اطلاعات رو در بله به ایدی Mobarez38 ارسال کن هر کسی نیاز داشت استفاده کنه

7👎5

3 May 2026, 21:25 UTC≈2,340 views25 reactionsread 23 August 2026

حتما هستند کسانی که وی پی ان خریدن پولشون رو بالا کشیدن من خودم یه 260 هزار تومن خرید کردم نداد و بعد یکی یه تست 50 هازر تومنی بهم داد کار کرد بعد 850 هزار واریز کردم بلاکم کرد یکی از دوستام هم میگه من 5 میلیون واریز کردم بلاکم کرده یه نکته ای رو بگم اینها بر این باور هستند که چون خرید فروش وی پی ان جرم هست کسی نمیره شکایت کنه من زنگ زدم اطلاعات گفتم دهنمون سرویس شده چی کار کنیم . گفت خرید فروش اینترنت جرمه گفتم باب

👍204👎1

25 Dec 2025, 13:28 UTC≈2,840 views12 reactionsread 23 August 2026

این مدلی دیگه ندیده بودم باید برم اینستاگرام فعالیت کنم 😐😐

👍12

25 Dec 2025, 13:27 UTC≈2,890 views20 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👎18👍2

20 Oct 2025, 22:51 UTC≈3,670 views13 reactionsread 23 August 2026

باورم نمیشه حتی با اینکه میگه گینس ثبت کردم چند هزار نفر کامنت گذاشتن اموززش بخرن

👍121

20 Oct 2025, 22:50 UTC≈3,600 views5 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍3👎2

19 Oct 2025, 14:46 UTC≈3,150 views13 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Poll

به نظرتون ادامه بدیم؟

  1. نه نمیخواد، هر چی بگی باز کار خودشونو میکنن9%
  2. آره واقعا آگاه سازی میشه78%
  3. برام اهمیتی نداره13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8👍4👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Forex_Fraud. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Oct 2025, 14:46 UTCAnonymous Poll436 voters

به نظرتون ادامه بدیم؟

  1. نه نمیخواد، هر چی بگی باز کار خودشونو میکنن9%
  2. آره واقعا آگاه سازی میشه78%
  3. برام اهمیتی نداره13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Sept 2025, 11:03 UTCAnonymous Poll793 voters

به نظرتون بالاخره میشه از ترید پول دراورد؟

  1. بله54%
  2. خیر26%
  3. نمیدانم20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2025 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

فراچارت
@farachart · 43,057
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
Battle Trading
@battle_trading · 72,231
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
UtoFX | مرجع فاندامنتال فارکس و انس طلا
@UtoFx · 49,838
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کلاهبرداری های فارکسی” (@Forex_Fraud), 3,309 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Forex_Fraud.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.