💵FREE SIGNAL💵 Unlock Your Trading Potential with Our Free Signals!📈 Want even more exclusive insights and advanced strategies? Upgrade to our VIP group and elevate your trading game to the next level!🔼 Contact @forexsignalfxcon Website www.forexsignal-fx.com

Channel
Forex Signals FX | Free Forex Signals
@Forex_Signal_Fx_Signals_Free
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,948subscribers
-102 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001349183327 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Forex_Signal_Fx_Signals_Free |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Forex_Signal_Fx_Signals_Free |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 12,948 | +4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 12,944 | +5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 12,939 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 12,941 | -14 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 12,955 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 12,963 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:08 | 12,957 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:34 | 12,959 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 12,961 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 12,964 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:59 | 12,967 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 12,973 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 12,976 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 12,980 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 12,990 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 13,001 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 13,003 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 13,010 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 13,017 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 13,020 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.00%
- avg views ÷ 12,948 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 258
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.383%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (17 June 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,550 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 12.5% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
💵FREE SIGNAL💵 Unlock Your Trading Potential with Our Free Signals!📈 Want even more exclusive insights and advanced strategies? Upgrade to our VIP group and elevate your trading game to the next level!🔼 Contact @forexsignalfxcon Website www.forexsignal-fx.com
💵FREE SIGNAL💵 Unlock Your Trading Potential with Our Free Signals!📈 Want even more exclusive insights and advanced strategies? Upgrade to our VIP group and elevate your trading game to the next level!🔼 Contact @forexsignalfxcon Website www.forexsignal-fx.com
VIP CHANNEL RESULTS August, Friday 21 2026 🔹AUDUSD BUY/120PIPS ✅ 🔹AUDCHF BUY/TP2/50PIPS ✅ 🔹AUDJPY BUY/TP2/50PIPS ✅ 🔹AUDCHF BUY/TP1/20PIPS ✅ 🔹AUDJPY BUY/TP1/20PIPS ✅ TOTAL +260Pips ✅✅✅
VIP CHANNEL RESULTS August, Wednesday 19 2026 🔹AUDCAD BUY/SL -60PIPS 🔹GBPUSD BUY/TP3/120PIPS ✅ 🔹EURUSD BUY/TP3/120PIPS ✅ 🔹GBPUSD BUY/TP2/50PIPS ✅ TOTAL +240Pips ✅✅✅
❤1👍1
VIP CHANNEL RESULTS August, Friday 14 2026 🔹NZDUSD BUY/TP2/50PIPS ✅ 🔹AUDUSD BUY/TP1/20PIPS ✅ 🔹AUDUSD BUY/TP2/50PIPS ✅ 🔹USDCHF SELL/TP1/20PIPS ✅ TOTAL +140Pips ✅✅✅
❤1
VIP CHANNEL RESULTS August, Monday 07 2026 🔹EURUSD BUY/TP2/50PIPS ✅ 🔹AUDUSD SELL/SL -60PIPS 🔹AUDNZD BUY/TP2/50PIPS ✅ 🔹EURUSD BUY/TP1/20PIPS ✅ 🔹AUDNZD BUY/TP1/20PIPS ✅ TOTAL +80Pips ✅✅✅
💵FREE SIGNAL💵 Unlock Your Trading Potential with Our Free Signals!📈 Want even more exclusive insights and advanced strategies? Upgrade to our VIP group and elevate your trading game to the next level!🔼 Contact @forexsignalfxcon Website www.forexsignal-fx.com
❤1
💵FREE SIGNAL💵 Unlock Your Trading Potential with Our Free Signals!📈 Want even more exclusive insights and advanced strategies? Upgrade to our VIP group and elevate your trading game to the next level!🔼 Contact @forexsignalfxcon Website www.forexsignal-fx.com
💩1
VIP CHANNEL RESULTS June, Monday 27 2026 🔹AUDNZD BUY/TP1/20PIPS ✅ 🔹USDCAD SELL/SL -60PIPS 🔹USDJPY BUY/TP3/120PIPS ✅ TOTAL +80Pips ✅✅✅
💵FREE SIGNAL💵 Unlock Your Trading Potential with Our Free Signals!📈 Want even more exclusive insights and advanced strategies? Upgrade to our VIP group and elevate your trading game to the next level!🔼 Contact @forexsignalfxcon Website www.forexsignal-fx.com
🧿 WEEKLY VIP RESULTS 🧿 17-07-2026 to 20-07-2026 🔹AUDUSD BUY /TP1/20PIPS ✅ 🔹GBPUSD BUY/TP1/20PIPS ✅ 🔹USDJPY BUY /TP1/20PIPS ✅ 🔹AUDJPY BUY/TP1/20PIPS ✅ 🔹EURUSD SELL/TP2/50PIPS ✅ 🔹AUDJPY BUY/TP2/50PIPS ✅ -------------------------------- 🔹TOTAL TP +180 PIPS✅ 🔹TOTAL SL 0 PIPS 🔹NET PROFIT +180 PIPS✅✅✅
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @Forex_Signal_Fx_Signals_Free. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Forex_Signals_PIPs_Signal_Fx · 24,953
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
@Forex_Signal_Fx_Signals_Best · 34,803
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
@DanGoldTrader · 94,544
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Forex Signals FX | Free Forex Signals” (@Forex_Signal_Fx_Signals_Free), 12,948 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Forex_Signal_Fx_Signals_Free.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.