26 measurements spanning 26 days, net +26,026. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,862–66,701 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 03:57
61,066
+4,914
1 Sept 2026, 04:18
56,152
+1,718
31 Aug 2026, 03:17
54,434
+645
30 Aug 2026, 06:46
53,789
-1,124
29 Aug 2026, 03:53
54,913
+793
28 Aug 2026, 04:33
54,120
+726
27 Aug 2026, 02:27
53,394
-1
26 Aug 2026, 03:49
53,395
-730
25 Aug 2026, 04:56
54,125
+7,840
24 Aug 2026, 01:52
46,285
+18,620
22 Aug 2026, 09:37
27,665
+1,439
21 Aug 2026, 03:22
26,226
+1,706
20 Aug 2026, 04:18
24,520
+327
19 Aug 2026, 05:53
24,193
+264
18 Aug 2026, 07:32
23,929
+288
17 Aug 2026, 10:25
23,641
+144
15 Aug 2026, 20:03
23,497
-5,332
14 Aug 2026, 10:36
28,829
-1,685
13 Aug 2026, 00:36
30,514
+238
12 Aug 2026, 02:05
30,276
first reading
Engagement
53 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.63%
avg views ÷ 61,066 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,600
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.259%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 53 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
53 (19 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
62,543
Reactions total
162
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
35
Videos
1
Links
18
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
183 reactions across 45 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
67
36.6%
🔥
24
13.1%
👏
23
12.6%
🥰
20
10.9%
👍
14
7.65%
❤🔥
12
6.56%
😐
10
5.46%
😁
5
2.73%
🌭
4
2.19%
⚡
1
0.546%
👎
1
0.546%
💋
1
0.546%
🖕
1
0.546%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 آمادهاید سفر معاملاتی خود را آغاز کنید؟
اکونت Fortuna Markets خود را از لینک رسمی ما بسازید. برای تکمیل مراحل ثبتنام نیز میتوانید از راهنمایی تیم Astralink Pay استفاده کنید.
🔗 ثبتنام از لینک رسمی:
REGISTER NOW👀
⚠️ معامله در بازارهای مالی با ریسک همراه است؛ پیش از شروع، شرایط و قوانین را مطالعه کنید.
@marketsfortuna
🛡 ریسک هر معامله را جداگانه نبینید.
اگر سه معاملهٔ باز داشته باشید و در هرکدام ۱٪ سرمایه در خطر باشد، ریسک مجموعی حساب شما ۳٪ است.
اگر نمادها همجهت یا وابسته باشند، ممکن است زیانها همزمان فعال شوند. پیش از ورود تازه، ریسک تمام معاملات باز را جمع کنید و برای حسابتان سقف مشخص داشته باشید.
@marketsfortuna
همه خدمات مالی، در یک اپلیکیشن
سریع، ساده و منظم
دانلود آسترالینک پی ⬇️
📉 زیان و جبران آن برابر نیست.
اگر سرمایه ۲۰٪ کاهش یابد، برای برگشت به نقطهٔ آغاز به ۲۵٪ رشد نیاز دارید. پس از زیان ۵۰٪، جبران کامل به ۱۰۰٪ رشد نیاز دارد.
به همین دلیل، تعیین حد ضرر و حجم مناسب معامله برای حفظ سرمایه ضروری است.
@marketsfortuna
همه خدمات مالی، در یک اپلیکیشن
سریع، ساده و منظم
دانلود آسترالینک پی ⬇️
📘 مارجین و فری مارجین چیست؟
🔹 مارجین: بخشی از سرمایه است که برای باز نگهداشتن معامله درگیر میشود؛ هزینه یا زیان نیست.
🔹 فری مارجین: سرمایهٔ آزاد حساب برای تحمل نوسان یا بازکردن معاملهٔ تازه است.
هرچه فری مارجین کمتر شود، خطر نزدیکشدن حساب به استاپاوت بیشتر میشود.
@marketsfortuna
همه خدمات مالی، در یک اپلیکیشن
سریع، ساده و منظم
دانلود آسترالینک پی ⬇️
📘 فرق بالانس و اکوئیتی چیست؟
🔹 بالانس: پول حساب پس از بستهشدن معاملات است.
🔹 اکوئیتی: ارزش لحظهای حساب با درنظرگرفتن سود یا زیان معاملات باز است.
اکوئیتی پایینتر از بالانس یعنی فعلاً زیان باز دارید؛ اما زیان نهایی فقط پس از بستهشدن معامله مشخص میشود.
@marketsfortuna
همه خدمات مالی، در یک اپلیکیشن
سریع، ساده و منظم
دانلود آسترالینک پی ⬇️
⚡️ لوریج 1:1000 به این معنا نیست که باید با بیشترین حجم معامله کنید.
لوریج میتواند قدرت خرید حساب را افزایش دهد؛ اما اگر حجم معامله را کنترل نکنید، زیان هم سریعتر بزرگ میشود.
✅ حجم مناسب
✅ Stop Loss
✅ مدیریت ریسک
🎯 تریدر حرفهای از لوریج استفاده میکند؛ لوریج از او استفاده نمیکند.
✈️ @marketsfortuna
💰 چالش مدیریت سرمایه
اگر حساب شما ۱۰۰ دالر باشد و بخواهید فقط ۱٪ ریسک کنید، حداکثر زیان مجاز شما در یک معامله چقدر است؟
🔵 A) یک دالر
🟢 B) پنج دالر
🟠 C) ده دالر
👇 جواب درست را انتخاب کنید؛
@marketsfortuna
#forex #gold #trader #trading #broker #fortunamarkets
همه خدمات مالی مورد نیازت، در یک اپلیکیشن ✅
از خرید و فروش تتر تا پشتیبانی بروکری،
آسترالینک پی سریع، ساده و همیشه در کنار شماست.
📲 همین حالا نصب کنید و راحتتر شروع کنید.
Download 📥
⚠️ FOMO میتواند یک معامله خوب را به یک تصمیم بد تبدیل کند
وقتی بازار بدون شما حرکت میکند،
نباید فوراً به دنبال آن بدوید. 📈
قبل از هر ورود، این سؤال را از خود بپرسید:
❓ آیا این ورود طبق برنامه من است؟
❓ آیا حد ضرر و هدفم مشخص است؟
❓ آیا فقط از ترس جا ماندن وارد میشوم؟
اگر جواب روشن نیست،
⛔️ ورود نکن.
🧠 معاملهگری حرفهای یعنی:
اول برنامه، بعد اجرا
🎯 اگر نقطه ورودت از قبل مشخص نبود،
تعقیب قیمت نکن.
📲 @marketsfortun…
❤1❤🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @Fortuna_updates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Fortuna_updates edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 225,827 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Fortuna_updates named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@maketsfortuna named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fortuna Markets” (@Fortuna_updates), 61,066 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fortuna_updates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.