Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
مجلس الخدمة العامة الاتحادي
@Fpsc_Gov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
93,293subscribers
-317 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001656949676 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fpsc_Gov |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fpsc_Gov |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 93,293 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 93,299 | -29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 93,328 | -22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 93,350 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 93,363 | -15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 93,378 | -37 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 93,415 | -14 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 93,429 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 93,430 | -14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 93,444 | -13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 93,457 | -16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 93,473 | -16 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 93,489 | -17 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 93,506 | -25 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 93,531 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 93,536 | -19 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 93,555 | -19 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 93,574 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 93,589 | -21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 93,610 | first reading |
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19.1%
- avg views ÷ 93,293 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 17,900
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (21 July 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 392,760 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
معاون الامين العام لمجلس النواب في ضيافة مجلس الخدمة ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ أستقبل رئيس مجلس الخدمة العامة الإتحادي الدكتور سعد عبد الحميد الساعدي ، صباح اليوم الخميس ٢٠٢٦/٨/٢٧ ، معاون الامين العام لمجلس النواب الاستاذ علاء المندلاوي . شَهَّدَ اللقاء الحديث عن مهام مجلس الخدمة العامة الإتحادي وسُبل التعاون واللقاء مع اللجان البرلمانية لإنضاج الرؤى والافكار التي من شأنها رسم سياسات الخدمة العامة في مُختلف…
Photo, posted without a caption
مجلس الخدمة يُشارك في اعمال لجنة الامر الديواني (٩٢) ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ استكمالاً لإعمال لجنة الامر الديواني (٩٢) لسنة ٢٠٢٠ والخاصة في ( تحديد خطة القبول السنوية في كُليات المجموعة الطبية والصحية والمهن الصحية الساندة ) ، شارك عضو مجلس الخدمة العامة الإتحادي ، الدكتور عدي كريم لعيبي ، في اعمال الاجتماع الثاني الدوري للجنة . الاجتماع ترأسه السيد الوكيل الفني لوزارة التخطيط الإتحادية ، الدكتور ماهر حما…
Posted without readable text
رئيس مجلس الخدمة يستقبل رئيس الهيئة العُليا للتنسيق بين المحافظات ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ أستقبل رئيس مجلس الخدمة العامة الإتحادي ، الدكتور سعد عبد الحميد الساعدي ، ونائب رئيس المجلس الدكتور احمد الدليمي ، والسادة اعضاء المجلس صباح اليوم الاربعاء ٢٠٢٦/٨/٢٦ ، رئيس الهيئة العُليا للتنسيق بين المحافظات ، الدكتور احمد الفتلاوي . رئيس مجلس الخدمة أستعرض في حديثه المهام الدستورية والقانونية للمجلس والتي أقرها …
Photo, posted without a caption
ورشة عمل تجمع رئيس الهيئة العُليا للتنسيق بين المحافظات مع مجلس الخدمة ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ أستضافَ مجلس الخدمة العامة الإتحادي ، صباح اليوم الاربعاء ٢٠٢٦/٨/٢٦ ، رئيس الهيئة العُليا للتنسيق بين المحافظات ، الدكتور احمد الفتلاوي. وعُقدَ على أثر الاستضافة ورشة عمل حضرها رئيس مجلس الخدمة العامة الإتحادي الدكتور سعد عبد الحميد الساعدي ، ونائب رئيس المجلس والسادة اعضاء المجلس ، ومدير عام دائرة التطوير ال…
Photo, posted without a caption
رئيس مجلس الخدمة في ضيافة لجنة العمل النيابية •••••••••••••••••• استضافت لجنة العمل ومؤسسات المجتمع المدني والخدمة العامة الاتحادية والشباب والرياضة والثقافة والسياحة النيابية برئاسة النائب نهلة جبار الفهداوي (رئيس السن ) وعدد من أعضاءه ،اليوم الاثنين ٢٠٢٦/٨/٢٤ ،رئيس مجلس الخدمة العامة الاتحادي الدكتور سعد عبد الحميد الساعدي . الاستضافة حضرها أيضا مدير عام دائرة العمل والت…
مجلس الخدمة ينظّم ورشة توعوية حول مخاطر هدر المياه وأثرها في الأجيال القادمة ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ نظّم مجلس الخدمة العامة الاتحادي ورشة توعوية بعنوان "مخاطر هدر المياه وأثرها في الأجيال القادمة"، يوم الاحد الموافق ٢٣ اب ٢٠٢٦، بمشاركة موظفي دوائر المجلس . وادارت الورشة السيدة ضحى محمد، اختصاصي جودة مسؤولة شعبة المواصفات الدولية والتحسين المستمر وعضو فريق آيزو الطاقة والكفاءة في المجلس، استعرضت فيها أبرز…
تعليمات آلية تسلم المعلومات والاخبارات الخاصة بقضايا الفساد والكسب غير المشروع ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ في إطار تعزيز الرقابة الاستباقية ، ودعم هيئة النزاهة الإتحادية في نشر الاليات المُتخذة من قبلها في مكافحة الفساد الإداري والمالي والكسب غير المشروع ، ربطاً الاليات الخاصة بذلك ، والمنشورة ايضاً في جريدة الوقائع العراقية بعددها ( ٤٨٦٦ في ٢٠٢٦/٥/١١ ) . مجلس الخدمة …
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @Fpsc_Gov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Fpsc_Gov edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 27 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 27 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 227,749 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@gZp7Qxn8Vr81MmRi · 34,496#1
@iraqone123 · 6,692#2
@takatf_iq · 3,347#3
@Thejobs1 · 18,063#4
@postgrduate_certificates · 5,664#5
@Se_rviceJobs1 · 24,956#6
@moheiq · 270,121#7
@inainaiq · 170,435#8
@Medical_cours1 · 714,839#9
@Muhannad_job · 191,346#10
@iraq_boys4 · 231,775#11
@sci_health · 13,713#12
@teenwdiefhoom · 81,725#13
@K_R_E_T · 85,303#14
@IraqiMediaNetwork · 31,403#15
@majless2024 · 1,211#16
@t3iniq · 117,955#17
@alawaeelone · 528#18
@MHP_Rights · 18,436#19
@Scientists_news1 · 9,119#20
@Economynews2021 · 4,514#21
@cabinetmedia · 86,835#22
@iraq_jobs2 · 80,926#23
@aguftf · 2,610#24
@science_is_1 · 11,188#25
@loszz1 · 13,894#26
@Medical_Engineering_News · 9,314#27
@a56s4 · 29,205#28
@UoTCDD · 6,041#29
@law67_2022 · 6,295#30
@Lawyerss2023 · 9,496#31
@mohesr_official_channel · 335,240#32
@alsbaahiq · 497,137#33
@DrOyoun193com · 2,352#34
@SabrenNewss · 1,103,350#35
@mofiraq · 54,152#36
@MydoctorA96 · 189,798#37
@MHN_2023 · 32,797#38
@university_of_baghdad_photos · 162,277#39
@mohmedia · 48,252#40
@mohesr_iq · 301,401#41
@bdoncode · 7,594#42
@uonahrain · 3,281#43
@Federal_Commission_Of_Integrity · 6,720#44
@FastNews1iq · 82,564#45
@BROTHERSIRQ · 223,211#46
@Haider36Mu · 8,252#47
@moet2023 · 6,228#48
@Medical_cours11 · 13,044#49
@Graduate_News · 10,587#50
@iraqi1_news · 437,221#51
@uot_channel · 33,777#52
@Lawyresss · 23,147#53
@HE22iQ · 30,135#54
@irq2022 · 61,259#55
@cities_najaf · 172,705#56
@sjc_iq · 7,555#57
@mar_wan_1997 · 38,252#58
@engahmad88 · 176,576#59
@shafaaqnews · 10,370#60
@markzalshaa · 2,875#61
@mustafajabbarsanad · 96,535#62
@IHECOfficail · 135,527#63
@gov1e · 6,964#64
@omeralij · 211,575#65
@IraqMedicalStudents · 96,890#66
@mochchannel · 8,691#67
@iqmofa · 8,507#68
@MM95_95MM · 22,644#69
@ministry_of_oil · 19,068#70
@epciq · 2,711#71
@IraqiGov · 3,983#72
@DQ_IN_DETAIL · 58,505#73
@nnc101 · 153,647#74
@EarthKarbalahaiderarif · 40,434#75
@doctors0000 · 22,318#76
@employ_moh_iq · 9,983#77
@designers_tribe · 4,972 (as read 16 August 2026)#78
@dcec1 · 20,682#79
@medical99089 · 13,147#80
@iraqiairways2 · 19,657#81
@ilteswithQam · 15,863#82
@StevenNabilIraq · 186,108#83
@iraqDMC · 3,844#84
@Writing_Analysis · 10,054#85
@alsharqiyagroup · 52,634#86
@IraqiPmo · 26,656#87
@MLT400 · 10,011#88
@rafidainbank · 56,728#89
@borsakirkuk · 36,833#90
@ELCareers · 40,274#91
@Medical_Field · 109,662#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cabinetmedia · 86,835
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
@t3iniq · 117,955
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
@moheiq · 270,121
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@IHECOfficail · 135,527
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
@lraq_ed_maktaba · 46,429
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
@NOMHEDU · 47,766
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
@mofiraq · 54,152
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
@iraq_jobs2 · 80,926
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
@teenwdiefhoom · 81,725
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
@mohmedia · 48,252
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
@Muhannad_job · 191,346
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
@media_hajj · 49,314
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
@K_R_E_T · 85,303
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
@Study_Iraq01 · 45,729
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
@irq2022 · 61,259
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
@rafidainbank · 56,728
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@Taeyinat · 88,214
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026
@mohesr_official_channel · 335,240
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@DQ_IN_DETAIL · 58,505
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
@alsbaahiq · 497,137
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 August 2026
@iraq1jobs · 60,248
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@FastNews1iq · 82,564
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مجلس الخدمة العامة الاتحادي” (@Fpsc_Gov), 93,293 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fpsc_Gov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.