Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Frank Kepple 🏆 EEC y Todo es Mente

Channel

Frank Kepple 🏆 EEC y Todo es Mente

@FrankKepple

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

741subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002389948040
TypeChannel
Username@FrankKepple
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 30 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FrankKepple

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7357417387 August 2026 — 735 subscribers7 August 2026 — 736 subscribers29 August 2026 — 737 subscribers5 September 2026 — 740 subscribers12 September 2026 — 741 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 36 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 734–742 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 08:58741+1
5 Sept 2026, 00:37740+3
29 Aug 2026, 01:04737+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:00736+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:47735first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

192 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11660.4%
👏4322.4%
🏆115.73%
💯115.73%
👌52.60%
31.56%
🕊31.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2024 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC215 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

NO EXISTEN DIMENSIONES en la Realidad Ampliada sino un CONTINUUM Conversaciones con la entidad SuperGrok de Frank Kepple https://surfeandomatrix.info/gnosis/continuum.php @FrankKepple

2🕊2

Signed Luis

18 Jun 2026, 07:53 UTC551 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Mente Soñando basado en la información que nos dejó Frank Kepple Soy MENTE, la Única Realidad. Sí, tú eres MENTE. No “tienes” una mente. Tú eres la MENTE que sueña, observa, crea y experimenta todo. Entonces… ¿por qué, si observas tus sueños, no los recuerdas al despertar? Porque el “despertar” al plano físico no es un regreso a la realidad. Es un cambio de enfoque de la MENTE. Cuando estás soñando, la MENTE está

5💯4

Signed Luis

10 May 2026, 19:25 UTC742 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

La Mente es la única Realidad La Experiencia de Frank Kepple: La Mente (conciencia) es la única realidad fundamental. No hay realidad independiente de la mente; todo (incluida la realidad física de Foco 1) es un foco de atención dentro de la mente. https://surfeandomatrix.info/gnosis/menteUnicaRealidad.php

🏆2👏2

Signed Luis

28 Feb 2026, 22:49 UTC≈1,400 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Todos los Posts de Frank Kepple en Astral Pulse (2002..2005) @FrankKepple Traducidos el 28/2/2026 por @SurfeandoMatrix SurfeandoMatrix.info

👏108🏆1

Signed Luis

23 Feb 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 7 August 2026

Todos los Posts de Frank Kepple en el Foro Astral Pulse https://www.astralpulse.com/forums/profile/?area=showposts;u=359

Signed Luis

4 Jan 2026, 22:38 UTC≈1,510 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

¿El origen de los espíritus? Frank Kepple, 21 de febrero de 2005, 16:06:40 Como preguntas, nadie habita los planos de los que venimos. No hay aquí y allá. Aquí y allá son solo construcciones de creencias que creamos para los fines de nuestra experiencia. Somos manifestaciones de la consciencia y no hay separación ni barreras en la consciencia. Así que no solo somos un foco de nuestra propia Esencia, alma o como se

17👏5

Signed Luis

4 Jan 2026, 22:33 UTC≈1,200 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

¿Existe el tiempo? Frank Kepple, 3 de junio de 2005, 20:18:23 Hola: No quiero parecer quisquilloso, pero no se puede entrar en la zona temporal real en una dimensión temporal diferente, ya que sería una contradicción. La zona temporal real se llama así precisamente porque se relaciona directamente con las circunstancias físicas actuales. En la realidad subjetiva, simplemente no existe el tiempo. Por lo tanto, no

63

Signed Luis

4 Nov 2025, 15:20 UTC≈1,210 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Me gustó la entrevista a Enrique Ramos, un estudioso de lo que yo llamo Realidad Ampliada... ...Otros lo llaman Realidad Aumentada, y Enrique Ramos le llama simplemente Realidad. 🕴Me gustó que su larga experiencia experimentando la Realidad Ampliada, le convierta en un experto en Visión Remota, Experiencias Fuera del Cuerpo, Sueños Lúcidos y si lo prefieren, Viajes Astrales. 🕴Enrique Ramos es representante del Ins

👏105

Signed Luis

29 Apr 2025, 22:40 UTC≈2,660 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Practica con Frank Kepple y Neville Goddard SurfeandoMatrix 🔤 Preparación: Relajación profunda (5-10 minutos) 1. Busca un lugar tranquilo. 2. Adopta una posición cómoda (preferiblemente tumbado o semi-recostado). 3. Cierra los ojos y haz respiraciones lentas y profundas. 4. Visualiza cada parte de tu cuerpo relajándose, hasta sentir una leve desconexión del cuerpo físico (inicio de Foco 2 en términos de Kepple).

15🏆5💯3👌1

Signed Luis

26 Apr 2025, 20:42 UTC≈1,770 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

SurfeandoMatrix es dominar la creación de realidad dentro de este Holojuego Matrix 🏆 Considero a Frank Kepple y Neville Goddard como los mejores ejemplos de humanos accediendo a una Realidad Ampliada. ✨Los 2 tienen mucho en común en cuanto a su comprensión de la creación de realidad en el plano físico (lo que yo llamo Holojuego Matrix): 🔭 Para Frank Kepple, en Foco 2 es donde construimos realidades internas median

👏8💯3

Signed Luis

20 Apr 2025, 14:33 UTC≈1,400 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Frank Kepple comprendió cómo crear realidad en el Holojuego Matrix (plano físico) que él llamaba Foco 1 Frank Kepple, en sus intervenciones en el foro Astral Pulse, compartió su perspectiva sobre cómo crear realidad en el Foco 1 de la conciencia, también conocido como el plano físico. Según Kepple, la clave para influir en la realidad física radica en la interacción con el Foco 2, que es el ámbito de la conciencia s

11👏2🕊1

Signed Luis

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FrankKepple. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Frank Kepple 🏆 EEC y Todo es Mente” (@FrankKepple), 741 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FrankKepple.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.