If I can do this successfully, whatβs stopping you from achieving even greater results? t.me/Frankie254Fx
β€2π2β€βπ₯1π―1π₯1π«‘1

Channel
@Frankie254Forex
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
10,072subscribers
+434 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001952324898 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Frankie254Forex |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Frankie254Forex |
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 10,072 | +263 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:14 | 9,809 | +45 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 9,764 | +38 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 9,726 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 9,733 | -14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 9,747 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 9,744 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:59 | 9,742 | +19 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 9,723 | +60 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 9,663 | +21 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 9,642 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 9,638 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:21 | 9,638 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (30 July 2026 β 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 954 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
393 reactions across 36 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 131 | 33.3% | |
| π₯ | 91 | 23.2% | |
| π― | 36 | 9.16% | |
| π | 28 | 7.12% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 26 | 6.62% | |
| π₯° | 22 | 5.60% | |
| π«‘ | 18 | 4.58% | |
| π | 11 | 2.80% | |
| β | 8 | 2.04% | |
| π | 6 | 1.53% | |
| π | 5 | 1.27% | |
| π€© | 5 | 1.27% | |
| π | 4 | 1.02% | |
| π | 2 | 0.509% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 393 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
If I can do this successfully, whatβs stopping you from achieving even greater results? t.me/Frankie254Fx
β€2π2β€βπ₯1π―1π₯1π«‘1
$51 Flipped to $3,100 Successfully β Are you patient enough to wait for this kind of results? This is after 9 days of holding the tradesππ t.me/Frankie254Fx
β€7β€βπ₯1π1π₯1π€©1π₯°1π«‘1π1
TRADING IS FREEDOM β
β€3β€βπ₯1π―1π₯1π«‘1
THESE ARE THE APPS YOU NEED TO TRADE FOREX IN 2026. I hope this helpfulππ
β€3π1π₯1π₯°1π«‘1
Are you part of my trading community? How much did you make today?
π₯4π―2β€1β€βπ₯1π1
Caught this market open gap this morning trading with my communityβ Wishing you a profitable week aheadππ t.me/Frankie254Fx
β€8π₯3β€βπ₯1π1π₯°1
A sniper entry is simply a trade that doesnβt go into loss when you open itβ Focus on these when flipping a small accountππ
π₯11β4π―4β€2β€βπ₯1π1π₯°1
ππWeekends are the best time to review your progress & prepare for the new trading week ahead.β Incase you need any assistance, Iβm online to answer all your forex-related questions. To those who wanted to join my trading community, simply click here to send a direct messageβ‘οΈ t.me/Frankie254Fx
β€3π₯3β€βπ₯1π1π―1
When joining Account flipping, I recommend your balance to be above $10 β
β€9π1π1π―1π₯°1π«‘1
$16 Flipped to $1,500β Last week I told you weβre preparing to start selling Gold, simply follow the trend and watch your account grow ππ
β€2π2π2π₯2β€βπ₯1π€©1π1
Small account, low risk, high reward β Want the same results in your account? Check if youβll get account flipping slot here β‘οΈ t.me/Frankie254Fx
β€2π₯2π1π1π―1π«‘1π1
PIN THIS SOMEWHERE ππ Starting with a small balance means that the risk is very low, so youβll make better decisions when trading. (Youβre not attached to the money) Being attached to your balance and the fear of losing will bring emotions into your trading (affecting your decision making) and this is where you start losing
β€8β2π―2β€βπ₯1π₯°1π«‘1π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @Frankie254Forex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βFRANKIE 254 FOREX π₯π°β (@Frankie254Forex), 10,072 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Frankie254Forex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.