Gerade gepostet. Nur für unsere Mitglieder 💯 ⏱ Während andere schon im Trade sind überlegst du noch? 👉Hol dir jetzt den VIP Zugang!

Channel
FREE Lennart Trading Insights
@FreeLennartTrading
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,911subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 12 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003903702888 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FreeLennartTrading |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FreeLennartTrading |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:41 | 2,911 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:16 | 2,916 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:05 | 2,922 | -8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:20 | 2,930 | -10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:27 | 2,940 | +16 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:04 | 2,924 | +8 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 2,916 | +4 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 2,912 | +6 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 08:22 | 2,906 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 22.5%
- avg views ÷ 2,911 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 655
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 October 2026 – 12 October 2026) |
| Views total | 11,785 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Oct 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 42s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Keine Lust mehr auf Verluste oder unseriöse Signal Gruppen? Bei Signals2Trade geben wir stets unser bestes um unseren Service und die Signale Tag für Tag und zu verbessern! Alles damit wir gemeinsam als Community vorankommen 📈 Wenn du auch endlich alle Signale haben möchtest dann schreib 💬 "Info" an @S2TSupport
Ich konzentriere mich jetzt zu 100% auf die Teilnehmer die diese Chance ergriffen haben.
Der Rest schaut ab jetzt nur noch von außen zu was hier in den nächsten Wochen passieren wird.
Entscheidungen definieren deine Zukunft ✔️
❌ Alle Plätze für das Projekt sind offiziell vergeben.
Ich verdopple das Kapital für 5 Leute 🔥 Ich habe heute 5 exklusive 100 % Einzahlungs Boni von unserem Broker bekommen. Was könnte dein Konto mit doppeltem Kapital erreichen? Das ist deine Abkürzung. Das ist nur für die die es ernst meinen und ihr Wachstum massiv beschleunigen wollen 📈 Wenn du einen der letzten Plätze willst schreib "BONUS" an @S2TSupport
Ich bekomme oft die Frage: "Lennart, wieso bist du hier Long gegangen?" 📊 Meine Antwort darauf findet ihr auf YouTube. Dort lade ich regelmäßig komplette Trade-Analysen hoch, die euch meinen Denkprozess zeigen. KLICK HIER FÜR MEINE KOMPLETTE ANALYSE Das ist kein einzelnes Signal, das ist mein ganzes Wissen, mit dem ihr lernen könnt, wie ein Profi zu denken. 💯 Wenn du den Markt endlich verstehen willst, schreib "…
FREE Lennart Trading Insights pinned a video
Monats zusammenfassung ✔️ Total ➕6.71🔤 ➡️ Trades: 86✔️ 21❌ Kurz Mal einfache mathematik 1 Pip = 10€ ca. Heibt bei +6.71% sind das ca. +60.71% diesen monat 🤯 Fur Leute die mit etwas niedrigeren LOT zehlan Traden sind das ca. €200-3000 gewinn📊 100% Transparenz Schreibe unserem support fur mehr informationen ➡️@S2TSupport
📊 Monatsreport von 5wochen📊 Week: 07.09-13.09 Trades: 13✔️07❌ Total: ➕5.02🔤 Wenn Sie die genauen Trades noch einmal sehen möchten ➡️KLICKT HIER Week: 14.09-20.09 Trades: 22✔️04❌ Total: ➖4.37🔤 Wenn Sie die genauen Trades noch einmal sehen möchten ➡️KLICKT HIER Week: 21.09-27.09 Trades: 17✔️03❌ Total: ➕3.22🔤 Wenn Sie die genauen Trades noch einmal sehen möchten ➡️ KLICKT HIER Week: 28.09-04.10 Trades: 20✔️03…
FREE Lennart Trading Insights pinned a video
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FreeLennartTrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
An alle angeschlossenen: Wieviel konntet ihr bisher OHNE AUFWAND verdienen ❓
- 💵💵💵47%
- 💵💵29%
- 💵24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2026 to 12 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@FreeLennartTrading named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 October 2026 – 13 October 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FREE Lennart Trading Insights” (@FreeLennartTrading), 2,911 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FreeLennartTrading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.