Channel
@Frohnmaier
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
1,511subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001200677138 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Frohnmaier |
| Created | 2 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Frohnmaier |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 1,511 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 1,513 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 1,517 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:45 | 1,518 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 1,520 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 1,521 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 1,524 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 1,527 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 1,529 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 1,531 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 1,531 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,045 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 714 | 68.3% | |
| 💯 | 125 | 12.0% | |
| 👏 | 76 | 7.27% | |
| 🔥 | 50 | 4.78% | |
| ❤ | 42 | 4.02% | |
| 🤮 | 29 | 2.78% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 0.574% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.287% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,045 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Vor der Wahl versprechen sie Bürokratieabbau, nach der Wahl blähen sie den Staatsapparat weiter auf – wir brauchen weniger Beamtenstaat, weniger Regulierung und endlich echte Entlastung für Bürger und Unternehmen.
💯20👍6
Die CDU hat die Staatsbürgerschaft entwertet und die innere Sicherheit vernachlässigt – wir brauchen wieder klare Regeln, konsequente Rückführungen und ein restriktives Staatsangehörigkeitsrecht.
👍49💯9
Deutschland braucht eine flächendeckende Grenzsicherung: modern, konsequent und unter Einsatz von Drohnenüberwachung. Die USA zeigen, dass illegale Grenzübertritte wirksam eingedämmt werden können. Es ist Zeit, unsere Bürger endlich zu schützen. #AfD #Ceuta
👍63❤3
Diese Menschen werden nicht in Ceuta bleiben. Viele werden dorthin weiterziehen, wo die höchsten Sozialleistungen locken – auch nach Deutschland. Ich erwarte von der Bundesregierung sofortige Maßnahmen, damit sich 2015 nicht wiederholt. Friedrich Merz muss jetzt beweisen, dass er keine Angela Merkel ist.
👍39🔥6👎5🏆3👏3💯1
Mein Interview mit WELT zum Sturm auf Ceuta: https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/video6a6cae07ef632fe6ede66ff7/tausende-stuermen-ceuta-wir-muessen-vor-allem-druck-auf-die-herkunftsstaaten-ausueben.html
👍35
Im Gespräch mit WELT fordere ich klare Konsequenzen: Wer seine Grenzen nicht schützt, gefährdet ganz Europa. Spanien muss aus dem Schengen-Raum ausgeschlossen werden & unkooperative Herkunftsstaaten dürfen keine Entwicklungshilfe mehr erhalten.
👍47👏5🔥1
Wird Deutschland zum Detroit 2.0?
💯39
Heute Abend wird mein Sommerinterview bei SWR Aktuell Baden-Württemberg ausgestrahlt. Ein zentrales Thema: das deutsche Staatsbürgerschaftsrecht. Für mich ist klar: Die deutsche Staatsbürgerschaft darf nicht zum Ramschartikel werden. Deshalb fordere ich eine deutliche Verschärfung und eine Rückkehr zu den Regelungen von 1999. Es wird unter anderem um Migration, Rückführungen, innere Sicherheit und die wirtschaftlic…
👍31👏7❤1
Eine Partei, die die Einhaltung ihrer Grundsätze nur noch von ihren Wählern und den Bürgern verlangt, aber nicht mehr von ihren eigenen Spitzenpolitikern, hat diese Grundsätze in Wahrheit längst aufgegeben. Meine Meinung zur Debatte Leihmutterschaft und CDU.
💯38👍11
Deutschland steht für eine Politik des "fliegenden Geldbeutels". Aber Milliarden verteilen erkauft einem keine Gestaltungsmacht.
👍45
Normale Beziehungen zu Russland sind kein Verrat, sondern deutsches Interesse. Während andere längst die Zeit nach dem Krieg planen, streitet Deutschland noch darüber, ob man überhaupt reden darf.
❤31👏12💯5
Frieden entsteht nicht durch Beschimpfungen, sondern durch Diplomatie. Wer Konflikte beenden will, muss reden. Nüchtern, ernsthaft und im deutschen Interesse.
👍61
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Frohnmaier. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Markus Frohnmaier |
|---|---|
| Description | German politician |
| X / Twitter | @Frohnmaier_AfD |
| YouTube | UCRxrYW5BXG_gEzJfJ5P9ykg |
| Official site | https://www.markusfrohnmaier.de/ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Markus Frohnmaier MdB” (@Frohnmaier), 1,511 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Frohnmaier.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.