Channel
@FromJerusalem
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
970subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001403414037 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FromJerusalem |
| Created | Between 1 December 2018 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FromJerusalem |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 6 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 02:36 | 970 | -2 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 03:01 | 972 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 979 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 981 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 981 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
47 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 61.7% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 12.8% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 12.8% | |
| 😡 | 3 | 6.38% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 6.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴 SITUATION UPDATE: A report by Reuters claims Iran has warned the United States that it will respond with force if Israel attempts to attack the Ali al-Tahr mountain complex in southern Lebanon, where Hezbollah militants are holed up. According to the report, at least 12 members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps are also hiding within the complex, including two senior officers, alongside Lebanese Hezbolla…
❤2👍2🙏2
🔴 NOTE: What is not made clear in the above history lesson, is that the Jewish population in Arab countries fled for their lives as refugees under persecution, while all but a few of the “displaced” Arabs who had settled in the area of ancient Israel left on their own accord. They were told by the United Pan-Arab Army to leave their homes and that they would be able to return within a few days to a “Jew free” land…
😢3❤2
Video, posted without a caption
✅ REALITY CHECK: The Arab Genocide of Anyone Non-Muslim (The Islamic Conquest) A worthwhile listen From Oxford University:
Video, posted without a caption
❤7
🟡 A MESSAGE TO THE NATION OF ISRAEL: A message of unity that is being broadcast on Israeli channels:
Photo, posted without a caption
…..Below: A Reality Check from the Israeli foreign ministry yesterday:
Photo, posted without a caption
🔴 MORNING AT WAR: SAMARIA: Military Drill An IDF exercise is underway this morning and is expected through noon in the Ephraim and Menashe brigade areas. Expect increased movement of security forces. There is no concern about a security incident. Jihad Attack Yesterday afternoon Arab settlers threw large rocks onto an Israeli vehicle in attempt to murder the family. The vehicle made it to safety withou…
❤6
✅REALITY CHECK: Why are the Arab states pressuring President Trump to keep the jihad population in the Arab Gaza settlements? For exactly this reason: They are not “Gazans”, or “palestinians”. They are Arab clans, many from Egypt. They are part of the Islamic conquest strategy to conquer and rid the world of the State of Israel. It has NEVER been a “palestinian” issue. It has always been an Arab Islamic issue…
❤1🙏1
🔵 DEFENSE MINISTER, ON GAZA: A bold and accurate statement from Israel’s Defense Minister today, on the situation in the Arab Islamic conquest settlements in what is recently known as the “Gaza strip”. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz on Gaza: “There is no lasting solution for Gaza without migration. According to repeated surveys, 80% of Gazans want to leave, but Hamas prevents them from doing so, an…
🙏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FromJerusalem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FromJerusalem” (@FromJerusalem), 970 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FromJerusalem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.