Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 74 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 03:07
1,335
-4
1 Nov 2026, 01:19
1,339
-7
28 Oct 2026, 22:44
1,346
-1
25 Oct 2026, 22:31
1,347
+1,342
22 Oct 2026, 20:20
5
-1,346
20 Oct 2026, 14:56
1,351
-1
17 Oct 2026, 14:41
1,352
+2
14 Oct 2026, 13:36
1,350
-2
10 Oct 2026, 23:41
1,352
+1,348
9 Oct 2026, 13:58
4
-1,358
5 Oct 2026, 01:18
1,362
+1,359
30 Sept 2026, 05:21
3
-1,367
26 Sept 2026, 05:00
1,370
-8
19 Sept 2026, 10:22
1,378
no change
19 Sept 2026, 09:47
1,378
+1,377
12 Sept 2026, 09:21
1
-1,383
8 Sept 2026, 10:19
1,384
-1
3 Sept 2026, 02:26
1,385
+5
31 Aug 2026, 07:35
1,380
+3
28 Aug 2026, 00:06
1,377
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 30 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 22s
Average length
1m 06s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
759 reactions across 29 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
356
46.9%
❤
237
31.2%
😭
56
7.38%
🤣
52
6.85%
😁
31
4.08%
👍
25
3.29%
💔
2
0.264%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 759 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
♨️خلاصه داستان Ben 10 #7 :
بن تنیسون گروگان گرفته شده است! و از این پس همه چیز بدتر خواهد شد، چرا که هکس مرموز برای نخستین بار با نیرو های فراطبیعی کفرآمیز ارتباط برقرار میکند! آیا مکس و گوئن میتوانند قبل از سازمان تازه تاسیس SECT بن را پیدا کنند ؟ همچنین در این ایشو، نخستین حضور فردی از گذشتهی رازآلود مکس، به علاوه ظهور خارقالعادهی اورفلو رخ میدهد!
♨️ طبق خلاصه داستان ایشوی هفتم، حضور گروه محبوب و فن فیوریت «SECT» در این ایشو تایید شد.
مشخص نیست که خود ستوان استیل هم بینشون هست یا نه، اما احتمالا روزام با استفاده از تجهیزات کرب تونسته این تشکیلات رو بنا کنه.
Full Void LLP 🖤 pinned «دوستان، بنده حتی قبل از شروع انتشار کمیک هم عرض کرده بودم که "اگه کمیک چرتوپرت نباشه ترجمه رو سریع میرسونم" این ایشو چرتوپرت بود بنابراین ترجمش رو سریع نمیرسونم؛ ترجمه برای بنده کار اونقدر سختی نیست اما باید لذت بخش باشه، وقتی علاقه ی خاصی به این ایشو ندارم…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @FullVoid_HQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
LoPRax KonKour 🎃 @LoPRax_KonKour · 21,536 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 September 2026
کتابخانه روانشناسی و روانپزشکی @ravanketabb · 24,262 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
جزوات کنکوری روانشناسی @jozveravan1 · 23,620 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Full Void LLP 🖤” (@FullVoid_HQ), 1,335 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FullVoid_HQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.