Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Funical

Channel

Funical

@Funical

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,351subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001239715418
TypeChannel
Username@Funical
Descriptionمیتونین طنازی هاتون رو برای ربات بفرستین تا با #هشتگ خودتون قرار داده بشه😉 🤖 @FunicalBot گروه چت مدیونی https://t.me/+p6G4NQWaaw0zMWM0 جزوات،رفرنس،اخبار مهم📣 @medicaluniversity صرفا جهت رزرو تبلیغ🧑🏻‍💼 @meduniadmin
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Funical

Growth

13,32913,36313,3466 August 2026 — 13,361 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,357 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,362 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,360 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,351 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,342 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,329 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,334 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,337 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,354 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,346 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,363 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,355 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,342 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,332 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,346 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,350 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,346 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,343 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,341 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,338 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,345 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,351 subscribers13,3516 August 202630 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 24 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,324–13,368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 19:5313,351+6
29 Aug 2026, 18:5213,345+7
28 Aug 2026, 16:2213,338-3
27 Aug 2026, 19:0413,341-2
26 Aug 2026, 16:2413,343-3
25 Aug 2026, 19:4813,346-4
24 Aug 2026, 19:5913,350+4
23 Aug 2026, 07:0313,346+14
21 Aug 2026, 22:1413,332-10
20 Aug 2026, 20:0413,342-13
19 Aug 2026, 22:1813,355-8
18 Aug 2026, 18:4213,363+17
17 Aug 2026, 19:0513,346-8
16 Aug 2026, 15:3713,354+17
14 Aug 2026, 23:1413,337+3
13 Aug 2026, 12:2713,334+5
12 Aug 2026, 10:1513,329-13
11 Aug 2026, 12:1613,342-9
10 Aug 2026, 10:3713,351-9
9 Aug 2026, 10:0213,360first reading

Engagement

523 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 13,351 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
523 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
523
of 523 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 514 of 523 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held523 (5 August 202631 August 2026)
Views total705,314
Reactions total23,877
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14,600
Videos
5,830
Links
1,180

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
57m 52s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 60 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

23,877 reactions across 514 posts, in 59 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣8,23734.5%
👍2,86712.0%
2,73311.4%
💔1,5326.42%
🔥1,0544.41%
🤬1,0364.34%
😁1,0054.21%
❤‍🔥8443.53%
👎7052.95%
👏6082.55%
😐4171.75%
🤡3061.28%
🗿2581.08%
😍2411.01%
🤝2350.984%
🤮2320.972%
😭1980.829%
😢1790.75%
🤯1660.695%
🥱1510.632%
39 further kinds8733.66%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 514 of the 523 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,877reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 523 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 523 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Funical. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 523 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC362 views18 reactionsread 31 August 2026

یادش بخیر انقدر کنکور شرکت کرده بودم اون اواخر با مراقب شوخی دستی داشتیم @funical

😁18

31 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC637 views35 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

هسته فرد سیگاری&هسته فرد غیر سیگاری @funical

🤣34💔1

31 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC862 views43 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

وقتی دو ثانیه بیشتر تو دانشگاه به یه پسر نگاه میکنی: @funical

🤣39🤡2😁2

31 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC979 views26 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

یه روز خیلی معمولی، خوابگاه پسرونه @funical

🤣21❤‍🔥2👎1🤡1😁1

30 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC≈1,260 views28 reactionsread 31 August 2026

مثکه ادمینای کانال ما هم مثل بقیه گرفتن خوابیدن فقط میخواستن ماهارو بیدار کنن #Erfan @funical

🤣23👍2🤡21

30 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC≈1,280 views30 reactionsread 31 August 2026

آژیر حملات موشکی بار دیگر در امارات فعال شد. @funical

🔥27🤡21

30 Aug 2026, 23:04 UTC≈1,290 views41 reactionsread 31 August 2026

منابع عربی : گزارش ها تایید می کنند ایران به حداقل ۶ کشتی در خلیج فارس حمله کرده است. @funical

🔥344🤡2👍1

30 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC≈1,310 views42 reactionsread 31 August 2026

🔴 #خبر_فوری سپاه: شروع موج حملات موشکی و پهپادی جدید علیه اردن در دقایق گذشته @funical

🔥363🤡2👏1

30 Aug 2026, 22:39 UTC≈1,350 views51 reactionsread 31 August 2026

‌ 🔸خبرگزاری warfare اعلام کرد برای اولین بار 15 سامانه جنگ الکترونیک ایرانی به صورت همزمان(پالس زیگ) عملکرد نیروی هوایی امریکا در مرزهای غربی ایران را مختل کرده است @funical

❤‍🔥46🤡211🤣1

30 Aug 2026, 22:37 UTC≈1,360 views45 reactionsread 31 August 2026

ترامپ : دور جدید عملیات نظامی ما در ایران آغاز شد. @funical

🤬38🗿3🤣2❤‍🔥1👍1

30 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC≈1,300 views31 reactionsread 31 August 2026

فوری قطر از شهروندان خواسته است در خانه‌های خود بمانند و از نزدیک شدن به پنجره‌ها و سایر مکان‌های باز خودداری کنند. @funical

🤣20🔥7🤡3😁1

30 Aug 2026, 22:35 UTC≈1,270 views26 reactions1 Starread 31 August 2026

🔴 #خبر_فوری اتفاقات عجیبی در خلیج فارس در حال وقوع است، سیگنال‌های جعلی در حال ظاهر شدن هستند و به عنوان طعمه عمل می‌کنند. @funical

🔥20👍3🤡1😁1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 523 posts we hold for @Funical. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@Funical edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTCAnonymous Poll316 voters

دارن میزنن؟ @funical

  1. با صدای پاتریک پلی شد تو مغزم12%
  2. تسته، بگیر بخواب19%
  3. شوهر میخوام22%
  4. محسن رضایی میرقاعد هستم. ریدن نتایج48%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTCAnonymous Poll345 voters

سلام @funical

  1. می‌خواستی بگی "کِی میزنن؟" ؟24%
  2. علیک22%
  3. زن میخوام32%
  4. پونی کوچولو پرسِن هستم. ریدن نتایج21%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTCAnonymous Poll476 voters

توی شهریور جنگ میشه؟ @funical

  1. از سر قبرم بدونم آخه؟40%
  2. اگر جلیلی می‌بود نه12%
  3. خوش چشم گفته جنگ نمیشه پس آره15%
  4. محسن رضایی میرقائد هستم، نترسید.33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTCAnonymous Poll724 voters

رضا پهلوی؟ @funical

  1. سس خرسی58%
  2. شاهزاده10%
  3. محسن رضایی میرقاعد هستم. اهمیت نمی‌دهم.32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTCAnonymous Poll430 voters

کدومو بیشتر دوست داری؟ @funical

  1. ده ها سینی پر از میوه های بدون هسته و پوست کنده و آبمیوه‌های طبیعی16%
  2. خوابیدن روی یک تشک فوق العاده نرم با ویوی بارون آروم و بوی نم خاک47%
  3. تخمه و پفک و چیپس فراوون با یک فلش پر از فیلم و سریال قشنگ18%
  4. تکیه دادن به گوشه یه استخر خیلی تمیز و حس کردن امواج آب با بدنت و تماشای انعکاس آب در سرتاسر فضا20%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTCAnonymous Poll195 voters

چرا وقتی خود تلگرام قابلیت استوری رو برای همه باز کرده، هنوز استوری نمیذارید؟ @funical

  1. چون نمیخواهم "دیگران" فکر کنند من عقده‌ای هستم.17%
  2. چون نمیخوام "دیگران" فکر کنند من بی‌جنبه هستم.8%
  3. چون نمیخواهم "دیگران" من را قضاوت کنند.6%
  4. پاسخم بین سه گزینه بالاست اما برای انکار آن می‌گویم "چون دوست ندارم".69%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 523 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 977,356 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مدیکالیسم | medicalism
@Doctor_MIB_iran · 48,472
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Medical University 🏛⚕
@medicaluniversity · 82,005
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
اطلاع‌رسانی دانشجویی
@ettela_daneshjoyi · 113,333
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
توییتر دانشجویان علوم پزشکی
@medtweeet · 84,251
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
پُست کشیک
@postkeshik · 38,981
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
دانشجویان علوم پزشکی
@medicall_students · 74,917
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
medistU | مدیستیو
@medistU · 53,543
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
توییتر دانشجویی
@Twitterjo · 50,275
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
داروشناسی پزشکی
@medical_drugs1 · 52,247
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
دنیای پروژه
@donyayeproject · 87,668
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
کار دانشجویی علوم پزشکی | مدیلنسر
@medilancer · 93,931
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Medical_PDF💉
@pdfvahidzali · 88,055
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
@lMedixl * فایل های پزشکی
@lmedixl · 39,172
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Medical Jozveh
@medical_jozveh_channel · 122,619
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Funical” (@Funical), 13,351 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Funical.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.