Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 89 days, net -802. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,669–12,711 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 03:58
11,789
-11
3 Nov 2026, 03:20
11,800
-10
2 Nov 2026, 04:10
11,810
-2
1 Nov 2026, 04:31
11,812
-7
31 Oct 2026, 03:36
11,819
-3
30 Oct 2026, 05:30
11,822
-11
29 Oct 2026, 08:08
11,833
-16
28 Oct 2026, 05:57
11,849
-12
27 Oct 2026, 08:07
11,861
-12
26 Oct 2026, 06:55
11,873
-13
25 Oct 2026, 05:25
11,886
-10
24 Oct 2026, 07:55
11,896
-2
23 Oct 2026, 08:58
11,898
-13
22 Oct 2026, 10:26
11,911
-9
21 Oct 2026, 04:21
11,920
-7
20 Oct 2026, 03:30
11,927
-19
19 Oct 2026, 05:17
11,946
-9
18 Oct 2026, 07:45
11,955
-14
17 Oct 2026, 09:06
11,969
-8
16 Oct 2026, 05:59
11,977
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 18 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.696%
avg views ÷ 11,789 subscribers
Avg views / post
82.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
21 (18 March 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total
82
Reactions total
5
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 18:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,280
Videos
≈74
Links
≈1,310
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
49
60.5%
❤
8
9.88%
👍
6
7.41%
❤🔥
5
6.17%
⚡
4
4.94%
🌚
4
4.94%
👏
3
3.70%
🥴
2
2.47%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🗳️ Zero inflation for FUSE is up for a vote
→ 0 new FUSE minted
→ 400M cap, enforced on-chain
→ Revenue buys FUSE on the market
→ 30M treasury FUSE funds staking rewards
🗓️ Vote Nov 4–8: https://snapshot.box/#/s:fusedao.eth/proposal/0x2cbfd862e21f2efe02f3593ff4409d3e40a5f4a61d3af6797d7a2c48d636cc7d
🌐 Plus, the new fuse.io/network is live: see how Fuse makes money and how revenue flows back to FUSE.
The 2026–2027 …
Yield on USDC is currently sitting at 9.4%
That’s not something to ignore.
Put your idle USDC to work and start earning today.
Get it 👉 SOLID APP
Website | Twitter | Telegeram
Launching a loyalty program shouldn't require a development team.
On Fuse, businesses can launch:
☕ Loyalty tokens
💵 Branded stablecoins
🤖 AI-managed rewards programs
With transaction fees of just $0.0001, rewarding thousands of customers costs less than a cup of coffee.
Read more 👇
https://news.fuse.io/launch-a-loyalty-token-or-branded-stablecoin-for-your-business/
Website | Twitter | Solid
Fuse staking discussions are moving forward .
The current plan explores allocating 50M FUSE in rewards to support Validators and Solid stakers, helping strengthen participation and align incentives across the ecosystem.
Join the discussion and help shape what comes next for Fuse
👉 https://x.com/Fuse_network/status/2061761151999136028?s=20
Website | Twitter | Solid
Meet Solid Agent Wallet 🟢
Turn your Solid account into a secure payment layer for AI agents.
Let Claude, ChatGPT, or any autonomous system make x402 payments on your behalf, without ever touching your private keys.
Details here 👇
https://news.fuse.io/fuse-now-has-a-native-agent-wallet-it-earns-yield/
Website | Twitter | Solid
What if building a blockchain app was as simple as describing it?
With the Fuse MCP Server, any AI assistant can connect directly to Fuse Network and:
→ Query wallets & transactions
→ Deploy ERC-20 tokens
→ Execute swaps
→ Build payment products
No blockchain integration code required.
Connect your LLM. Describe what you want to build. Let the AI handle the rest.
Read more 👇
https://news.fuse.io/how-to-build-on-…
While other EVM chains charge $0.01–$5 per transaction, Fuse charges just $0.0001.
That means:
→ 100,000 payments = $10 in network fees
→ ~2-second finality
→ Zero downtime since 2019
→ 135M+ transactions processed
When you're building payroll, remittances, loyalty programs, or payment apps, cost matters.
That's why products like Solid and Freedom Wallet run on Fuse.
Read more 👇
https://news.fuse.io/evm-compatibl…
FRC04: Staking Model Proposal 🆕
The team is currently evaluating a new staking model for FUSE as network inflation continues to decline.
The direction being evaluated includes:
> clearer separation between stakers and validators
> treasury-funded rewards to bridge the transition from inflation
> protocol revenue distributions for stakers as the long-term reward source
Check more below ⬇️
https://forum.fuse.io/t/fr…
The Solid Card is now accepted wherever Visa is accepted. 🌍
Spend at 175M+ Visa merchants worldwide with Apple Pay, Google Pay, and earn 3% cashback on qualifying purchases. Terms apply.
🟢🟢 Earn. Spend. Keep your crypto working 🟢🟢
Full breakdown 👉 https://www.solid.xyz/post/the-new-solid-card-is-here
Website | Twitter | Telegeram
AI agents can now make micropayments at scale.
Agents need to pay for data, APIs, services, and digital resources autonomously. That means millions of micropayments happening every day.
That's a completely new category of economic activity, and it needs infrastructure built for high-volume, low-cost transactions.
That's why Fuse is now live with x402,
The payment layer for the agent economy.🟢
Full breakdown ⬇️
h…
We are looking to hire a full-time Junior Marketing & Community profile to support daily marketing, community, and operational tasks.
APPLY with your CV and a short note via [email protected]
Details here 👉 Junior Marketing & Community
Website | Twitter | Solid
🔥2🥴1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @FuseAnnouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Omni Network @OmniFDN · 19,126 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 September 2026
Galxe @galxe · 153,579 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
Blazpay Announcement @BlazpayAnnouncement · 26,209 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Quai Network Announcements @QuaiNetwork_Announcements · 21,047 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
Script Network Announcements @scriptnetworkann · 29,654 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
Glacier News @glacier_news · 68,423 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Prom @prom_ann · 21,229 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 September 2026
Web3World Exchange @w3w_exchange · 27,911 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Gopher Announcements📢 @gopherannouncements · 42,596 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Mantle Announcements @mantlenews · 70,698 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Aethir Announcements @Aethir_Official · 125,432 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
ZNS Connect Name Service @znsconnect · 43,453 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
Cluster Protocol | Announcements @clusterprotocolann · 24,418 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
$RWAINC Announcements @RWA_Inc_Announcements · 37,957 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Aligned Layer @alignedlayer · 19,202 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
Biswap Announcements @biswap_news · 23,631 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 September 2026
The Data Foundation @datafdn · 54,813 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
CryptoNinjas Trading 🥷🏿 @cryptoninjas_trading_ann · 20,313 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 September 2026
Infinite Seas @infiniteseasdev · 44,337 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
BNB Chain @bnbchain · 72,074 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Cookie DAO Announcements @cookiedaoannouncements · 57,607 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
TokenPocket @tokenpocket_channel · 96,827 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fuse Announcements” (@FuseAnnouncements), 11,789 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FuseAnnouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.