Channel
@FutureVistas
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,203subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001398936419 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FutureVistas |
| Created | 31 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FutureVistas |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 2,203 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 2,205 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 2,207 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 2,206 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 2,209 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 2,211 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:29 | 2,214 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 2,216 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:50 | 2,218 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 2,219 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 2,219 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 32 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
A proposito di Papa Leone XIV, il quale presiede un'istituzione che, in Occidente, mostra tutti i sintomi di un modello organizzativo e simbolico esaurito. 1️⃣ Cali annui dei seminaristi vicini al 2,7%. 2️⃣ 12.000 seminaristi in TUTTA EUROPA. 3️⃣ 406.000 sacerdoti NEL MONDO. 4️⃣ L'Europa perde migliaia di preti ogni anno per età avanzata e decessi, non compensati dalle nuove ordinazioni. 5️⃣ Oltre un terzo dei prat…
Il resto del post lo potete leggere e commentare qui https://www.linkedin.com/posts/stefano-fait_geopolitica-osint-geoeconomia-share-7491486421321629697-e4e_/
Il "per sempre" , "il definitivo", gli assoluti, la contrapposizione populista dei fedeli pecorelle innocenti contro i potenti della Terra: tipica mentalità da branco
Branco vs Individuo Rossobruni = branco = genocidio questo, genocidio quello...si sentono sempre minacciati di estinzione, perché non riescono a dare un senso più profondo alla propria esistenza se non attraverso l'appartenenza al collettivo.
Sì, siete VECCHI 😈😈😈😜😁😂😂😂 Per tutti gli altri...no, non è un misterioso simbolo degli Antichi 😅
I sogni più comuni nel mondo... Nigeria, Ghana ➡️ sesso 🫦 😁😂😂😂😂 Bahamas ➡️ colombe 🕊️ 😇 Ungheria ➡️ I morti 💀👻 Resto del mondo ➡️ I DENTI! 🦷 I SERPENTI! 🐍
Più interessante ancora: l'estrema destra tedesca è sinofila molto più della sinistra Quindi abbiamo un'alleanza ROSSOBRUNA (AfD, Die Linke) su cui i comunisti e industriali cinesi possono contare per superare le difese europee. Però il problema è ISRAELE 🙄🙄🙄
Assolutamente scioccante: quasi uno spagnolo su 10 reputa che la Cina sia una nazione alleata con cui condivide interessi e valori. Mi domando cosa pensino dell'Iran. In un certo senso è consolante vedere che c'è chi è messo decisamente peggio di noi. 🔰 Se Zara passasse ai cinesi, mi piacerebbe vedere i risultati di un nuovo sondaggio.
La Francia avrebbe dovuto arrendersi senza combattere nel 1940. Israele avrebbe dovuto subire pogrom continui e abbandonare gli ostaggi. L'Ucraina avrebbe dovuto cedere il Donbas dopo l'invasione. Noi avremmo dovuto permettere agli Ayatollah di continuare a ricattarci su Hormuz, nucleare e terrorismo. Perché la pace è più importante di tutto il resto...
È morto Guccini...ma parliamo di noi, cioè di me...
Una parte odia, l'altra molto meno. Quella che odia di più è convinta di essere quella dei buoni.
L’ombra delle midterm La questione ora si fa delicata, soprattutto in previsione delle elezioni di midterm sempre più vicine (si terranno martedì 3 novembre), un momento fondamentale per il partito Repubblicano. Nella tornata elettorale, che cade a metà del secondo mandato presidenziale Trump, verranno rinnovati i vertici del Legislativo federale e diverse altre cariche negli Stati. Resta da vedere quale sarà l’impat…
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @FutureVistas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MONDO NUOVO (Stefano Fait) - GENERALE” (@FutureVistas), 2,203 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FutureVistas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.