Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SEÑALES GRATIS - GESTIÓN DE CUENTAS FOREX

Channel

SEÑALES GRATIS - GESTIÓN DE CUENTAS FOREX

@Fxbasic_entradastrading

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,194subscribers

-76 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001186385455
TypeChannel
Username@Fxbasic_entradastrading
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Fxbasic_entradastrading

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,93111,49511,2136 August 2026 — 11,270 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,270 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,287 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,249 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,251 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,231 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,214 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,180 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,495 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,443 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,399 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,366 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,328 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,348 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,332 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,311 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,306 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,942 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,931 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,408 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,371 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,337 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,320 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,306 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,278 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,275 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,272 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,254 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,194 subscribers11,1946 August 202610 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 35 days, net -76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,846–11,580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 07:0111,194-60
6 Sept 2026, 23:5911,254-18
4 Sept 2026, 08:5811,272-3
3 Sept 2026, 00:3211,275-3
1 Sept 2026, 20:3511,278-28
31 Aug 2026, 23:3711,306-14
31 Aug 2026, 01:0511,320-17
30 Aug 2026, 00:2811,337-34
29 Aug 2026, 02:5311,371-37
28 Aug 2026, 03:0411,408+477
27 Aug 2026, 02:5410,931-11
26 Aug 2026, 03:1410,942-364
24 Aug 2026, 23:5811,306-5
23 Aug 2026, 09:4211,311-21
21 Aug 2026, 23:1811,332-16
20 Aug 2026, 16:3511,348+20
19 Aug 2026, 15:3311,328-38
18 Aug 2026, 18:4211,366-33
17 Aug 2026, 18:0411,399-44
16 Aug 2026, 14:5311,443first reading

Engagement

611 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.51%
avg views ÷ 11,194 subscribers
Avg views / post
281
444 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
444
of 611 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 163 of 444 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held611 (6 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total124,889
Reactions total602
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 09s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

764 reactions across 213 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
43056.3%
🔥21828.5%
👏628.12%
🥰263.40%
🎉111.44%
🤩91.18%
😎50.654%
😘30.393%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 215 of the 611 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 764 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 611 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 01:10 UTC73 viewsread 3 September 2026

FLIPX 5 BUY ⬆️ 67429 SL. : 67286 TP1: 67572 TP2: 67737 TP3: 67934

3 Sept 2026, 00:34 UTC131 viewsread 3 September 2026

FLIPX 3 BUY ⬆️ 102196 SL. : 102100 TP1: 102312 TP2: 102515 TP3: 102678

3 Sept 2026, 00:31 UTC133 viewsread 3 September 2026

SFX VOL 99 BUY ⬆️ 4732 SL. : 4678 TP1: 4790 TP2: 4858 TP3: 4911

3 Sept 2026, 00:26 UTC131 viewsread 3 September 2026

FX VOL 20 BUY ⬆️ 115629 SL. : 115366 TP1: 115910 TP2: 116245 TP3: 116626

3 Sept 2026, 00:23 UTC129 viewsread 3 September 2026

FX VOL 80 BUY ⬆️ 60484 SL. : 60083 TP1: 60967 TP2: 61570 TP3: 62432

3 Sept 2026, 00:18 UTC133 viewsread 3 September 2026

GAINX 1200 BUY ⬆️ 92270 SL. : 92250 TP1: 92309 TP2: 92346 TP3: 92380

3 Sept 2026, 00:15 UTC135 viewsread 3 September 2026

GAINX 800 BUY ⬆️ 97009 SL. : 96990 TP1: 97045 TP2: 97100 TP3: 97150

3 Sept 2026, 00:09 UTC140 viewsread 3 September 2026

PAINX 600 SELL ⬇️ 101319 SL. : 101347 TP1: 101255 TP2: 101196 TP3: 101172

3 Sept 2026, 00:07 UTC138 viewsread 3 September 2026

PAINX 800 SELL ⬇️ 118273 SL. : 118285 TP1: 118250 TP2: 118210 TP3: 118170

Showing the 12 most recent of 611 posts we hold for @Fxbasic_entradastrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 22:59 UTCAnonymous Poll48 voters

Que te parece la idea de hacer un entrenamiento de índices Sinteticos usando la plantilla Automática completamente en vivo conmigo?.

  1. Si quiero una oferta de la plantilla y el entrenamiento69%
  2. Acabo de comprar la plantilla y me gustaría ingresar alentrenamiento33%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

QUIEN YA SE VIO LAS DOS CLASES GRATIS DE KI ESTRATEGIA?

  1. Ya las vi64%
  2. No las he visto36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 611 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Trading Algorítmico MQL5
@mql5es · 45,238
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SEÑALES GRATIS - GESTIÓN DE CUENTAS FOREX” (@Fxbasic_entradastrading), 11,194 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fxbasic_entradastrading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.