Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Газпром добыча шельф Южно-Сахалинск

Channel

Газпром добыча шельф Южно-Сахалинск

@GDSSakhalin

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

597subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002487095115
TypeChannel
Username@GDSSakhalin
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GDSSakhalin

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

574597585.56 August 2026 — 574 subscribers6 August 2026 — 574 subscribers14 August 2026 — 582 subscribers21 August 2026 — 583 subscribers8 September 2026 — 581 subscribers16 September 2026 — 597 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 571–600 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 05:37597+16
8 Sept 2026, 14:40581-2
21 Aug 2026, 12:14583+1
14 Aug 2026, 01:43582+8
6 Aug 2026, 18:03574no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:37574first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

61 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2845.9%
👍1829.5%
914.8%
🥰58.20%
🐳11.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC161 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«На одной волне»: компания «Газпром добыча шельф Южно-Сахалинск» в шестой раз поддержала регату «Паруса надежды» 1–2 августа в заливе Невельского вблизи Холмска состоялась традиционная парусная регата «Паруса надежды». Более 40 юных яхтсменов в возрасте от 7 до 17 лет из Холмска, Невельска, Ванино и Комсомольска-на-Амуре вышли на старт, чтобы продемонстрировать мастерство, спортивный характер и любовь к морю. Подд

🔥94👍3🥰2🐳1

4 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC193 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

«Энергия Сахалина»: итоги форума в материалах СМИ XXX Международный Дальневосточный энергетический форум «Энергия Сахалина» стал площадкой для обсуждения ключевых вопросов развития энергетики, современных технологий и подготовки профессиональных кадров. В дни форума руководители «Газпром добыча шельф Южно-Сахалинск» приняли участие в интервью и рассказали о деятельности компании, реализации проекта «Сахалин-3» на ш

🔥52🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC180 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Паруса надежды: море, спорт и новые победы 1–2 августа в заливе Невельского вблизи города Холмска состоялась традиционная парусная регата «Паруса надежды». Уже в шестой раз соревнования прошли при поддержке компании «Газпром добыча шельф Южно-Сахалинск». Юные яхтсмены вновь вышли на водную дистанцию, чтобы продемонстрировать мастерство управления парусом, силу характера и командный дух. Для компании, чья деятельно

👍5🔥2🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC250 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Газпром добыча шельф Южно-Сахалинск» представил современные технологии подводной добычи на форуме «Энергия Сахалина» 30–31 июля в Южно-Сахалинске состоялся XXX Международный Дальневосточный энергетический форум «Энергия Сахалина» — одна из крупнейших отраслевых площадок региона, объединившая представителей власти, нефтегазовой отрасли, науки и бизнеса. Компания представила мультимедийную экспозицию «Энергия людей

👍7🔥63🥰1

1 Aug 2026, 00:54 UTC275 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sakhonlineVideo

Генеральный директор «Газпром добыча шельф Южно-Сахалинск» Валерий Гурьянов – об особенностях технологии подводной добычи углеводородов. ——— ✒️ Подписаться на нас: Telegram I MAX 📲 Прислать нам новость: @Sakhonlinebot

🔥6👍3

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @GDSSakhalin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Газпром добыча шельф Южно-Сахалинск” (@GDSSakhalin), 597 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GDSSakhalin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.