Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,442. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,220–23,077 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 06:58
22,179
-78
15 Sept 2026, 04:37
22,257
-45
13 Sept 2026, 10:17
22,302
-35
11 Sept 2026, 16:19
22,337
-70
9 Sept 2026, 05:21
22,407
-87
5 Sept 2026, 19:20
22,494
-47
3 Sept 2026, 20:00
22,541
-43
2 Sept 2026, 08:32
22,584
-15
1 Sept 2026, 11:07
22,599
-6
31 Aug 2026, 10:16
22,605
-9
30 Aug 2026, 08:53
22,614
-10
29 Aug 2026, 05:18
22,624
-28
28 Aug 2026, 05:57
22,652
-55
27 Aug 2026, 04:02
22,707
-40
26 Aug 2026, 04:18
22,747
+80
25 Aug 2026, 04:05
22,667
+279
23 Aug 2026, 21:54
22,388
+308
22 Aug 2026, 04:39
22,080
+317
20 Aug 2026, 21:43
21,763
+221
19 Aug 2026, 22:16
21,542
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.25%
avg views ÷ 22,179 subscribers
Avg views / post
721
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
52 (16 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
10,100
Reactions total
199
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 12:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,097 reactions across 47 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
461
42.0%
🔥
278
25.3%
👍
208
19.0%
❤🔥
58
5.29%
👏
25
2.28%
👌
17
1.55%
🥰
11
1.00%
⚡
7
0.638%
✍
7
0.638%
🏆
7
0.638%
💯
7
0.638%
🦄
6
0.547%
🍾
2
0.182%
🕊
2
0.182%
👀
1
0.091%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 52 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GEMEwallet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 52 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Crypto payments look simple from the outside.
Send. Wait. Done.
Behind the scenes, there’s a whole infrastructure making that happen ☝🏻
We dug into what it takes to build that infrastructure from scratch, the hidden costs that come with it, and how GEME approaches it differently.
🔗 Learn something your crypto friends don’t know: https://medium.com/@GEMEwallet/building-your-own-crypto-payment-stack-vs-c33997bb8427…
Where Web3 goes next matters. We want GEME users there first ☝🏻
With 1B+ monthly active users and 500M+ people interacting with Mini Apps every month, Telegram is becoming a major ecosystem for games, payments, communities, and crypto.
That’s why we’re building GEME where this growth is happening.
With GEME in Telegram, you can:
💎 Swap and manage your crypto without leaving Telegram
⚡️ Get to your wallet in secon…
Quick Monday check in 🐼
How many points have you stacked in GEME Quests so far?
The top 20 split the $200 reward pool, and the leaderboard is changing every day 🔥
Every swap, deposit, referral, and completed quest can add more points to your score.
😉 The earlier you start, the more chances you have to move up.
👉🏼 Start stacking points: t.me/GEMEWallet_bot
💎 GEME Telegram App | GEME Web-platform | Website | X |…
🚀 A new chapter for GEME users starts today!
We’re taking GEME wallet beyond swaps and transfers with the launch of GEME Quests.
Our first Quest is now live, with $200 in rewards up for grabs 💎
Your swaps, deposits, and other on-chain activity can now earn you points, help you climb the leaderboard, and unlock extra rewards.
Here’s how you can earn:
🔄 Swap on Ethereum, Solana, TON, Bitcoin & TRON
📥 Deposit and e…
𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗠𝗨𝗟𝗧𝗜𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗡𝗦 𝗕𝟮𝗕 𝗣𝗔𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗦 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗢 𝗢𝗡𝗘 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗦𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡
Any business that pays more than one person at a time eventually runs into the same wall.
Payment systems are built to move money from one sender to one recipient, and every additional person on the list multiplies the manual work.
For example, a Web3 studio with fifteen contributors spread across eight countries runs payroll every month. Before anything goes ou…
Did you know you can pay less TRX for the same token transfer? 👀
On TRON, where you send your tokens matters.
👉🏼 Sending a TRC-20 token to an empty wallet can cost more because the transaction needs more Energy.
👉🏼 Send it to a wallet that already has Energy, and the fee can be up to 2× lower!
So when you have a choice, skip the empty wallet and save your TRX.
And with GEME wallet, you can save even more with re…
🐶🐼🎮 The GEME wallet × DOGS Disc Trickster Tournament is over, but there’s still one thing left…
We are ready to announce our 20 winners 🏆🔥
Congrats to everyone who made it to the top and earned a share of the $1000 prize pool!
🎁 Prize distribution will be handled by DOGS, so winners, keep an eye on their channels for updates and the next steps
A huge thank you to everyone who joined, played, and battled it out w…
GEME wallet × NOAH AI Partnership
At GEME, we’re not only building a wallet.
We’re building an ecosystem around everything our users and partners need to move, use, and grow in crypto.
That’s why we’re teaming up with NoahAI, the AI-native operating system for onchain businesses. Helping crypto teams build, ship, and scale from one platform.
Teams can use Noah to turn ideas into working onchain products, then us…
👀 Something new is coming to GEME wallet
In the coming days, we’re launching something that will make your everyday social and on-chain activity a little more rewarding 🎁
Swaps, deposits, likes, reposts, follows, and more will soon become part of something bigger.
We’re keeping the details under wraps for now…
But GEME quests are coming 💎
Stay tuned. The full announcement is coming soon 🔥
💎 GEME Telegram App |…
More TRON. Less spent on fees 😎
GEME wallet just made outgoing TRON 🤑 transactions cheaper!
Whether you’re swapping tokens or sending assets, you’ll now need less TRX for the network fee (native TRX coin transfers are the only exception)
And there’s no guessing whether the discount applies - eligible transactions are marked “Fee reduced”
With lower network fees and some of the best rates on the market, GEME wall…
🏆 The GEME wallet × DOGS Disc Trickster Tournament has officially wrapped!
Huge shoutout to everyone who joined, played, earned points, and battled for a spot on the leaderboard 🎮🐶🐼
With a $1,000 in USDT prize pool on the line, the competition was intense!
🏆 So, who made it to the top?
We’re putting the final results together now. Winners will be revealed soon.
Keep an eye out. The next challenge might be closer…
SOMETHING IS LOADING… ⏳
Your next GEME Quest is closer than you think 👀
What’s waiting for you?
What’s up for grabs? 💰
The door is already open… 👀
Coming soon 🔥
💎 GEME Web-platform | Website | X | Instagram
❤🔥26🥰10👏2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @GEMEwallet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@GEMEwallet edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GEME wallet (Announcements)” (@GEMEwallet), 22,179 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GEMEwallet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.