Первое лицо которое получит кубок. Игра началась🎁

Channel
GGift
@GGift777
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,897subscribers
-59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002419053829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GGift777 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GGift777 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 1,897 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:45 | 1,903 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 1,910 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 1,916 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 1,921 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 1,928 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 1,933 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 1,940 | -13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 1,953 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 1,957 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 1,956 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 33s
- Average length
- 33s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😱 | 7 | 41.2% | |
| custom 5219760934074989500 | 6 | 35.3% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 5.88% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Глянул на днях паучка, теперь жду Одиссею в нормальном качестве. Может даже оценку напишу, если вам интересно будет🧀 А так ждём псов, но гемные номера будут у разрабов
Думаю многие уже видели разбор полетов о том как сотрудник Пашка со своей малыхой козырные номера на подарках забирали, в целом ничего удивительного как мне кажется. Рыба гниет с головы и удивляться тому что подчиненный скамит мамонтов как его начальник мне кажется странным. Мы с вами понимаем где находимся ☺️
custom 52197609340749895004
Сплошной символизм
Sticker, posted without a caption
😱2
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔥1
Вариант который приняли и варианты которые могли принять
🎁 School Time — 0.5% 🎁 Coin Mint — 0.5% 🎁 Redacted — 0.5% 🎁 Survivalist — 0.5% 🎁 Firebird — 1% 🎁 Heart Key — 1% 🎁 Neuralyzer — 1% 🎁 Red Lipstick — 1% 🎁 Hopscotch — 1% 🎁 Crystal Spire — 1% 🎁 Nesting Doll — 1% 🎁 Snakebound — 1% 🎁 Secret Message — 1% 🎁 Tip and Strip — 1.5% 🎁 Big Iron — 1.5% 🎁 Gram Validator — 1.5% 🎁 Master Stroke — 1.5% 🎁 Sea Legend — 1.5% 🎁 Cheetah King — 1.5% 🎁 Calligraphy — 1.5% 🎁 Royal Ink — 1.5% 🎁 …
Sticker, posted without a caption
Вышли
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @GGift777. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GGift” (@GGift777), 1,897 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GGift777.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.