#C672 TOP MIFIKLARβΌοΈ TOP JESTLARβΌοΈ TDM SETSβΌοΈ M416 LEDNIK 5 LVLβΌοΈ AKM FULLβΌοΈ MK14 4 LVLβΌοΈ MG3 2 LVLβΌοΈ πNARX : 399.000 uzs @GODZO_ACC_MINI +998700250300

Channel
ππ’πππ’ π ππ‘π π¦ππ©ππ’ π
@GODZO_MINI_SAVDO
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
30,724subscribers
-4,595 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001825831243 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GODZO_MINI_SAVDO |
| Description | πΊπΏ O'zbekistondagi N1 Akkaunt Savdo Kanali! βοΈKanalimizga joylangan Akkauntlarga shaxsan GODZO LEADER javob beradi πΊπΏ Asosiy kanal: @GODZO_SAVDO π¨π»βπ» Admin: @GODZO_ACC_MINI π Isbot: @GODZO_OTVIZ |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GODZO_MINI_SAVDO |
Topic
Gaming β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 30,724 | -189 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 30,913 | -182 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 31,095 | -185 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:02 | 31,280 | -280 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 31,560 | -444 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 32,004 | -181 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 32,185 | -288 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 32,473 | -141 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:25 | 32,614 | -109 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 32,723 | -148 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 32,871 | -126 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 32,997 | -87 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 33,084 | -130 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 33,214 | -135 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 33,349 | -133 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 33,482 | -157 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 33,639 | -221 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:09 | 33,860 | -41 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 33,901 | -73 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 33,974 | first reading |
Engagement
429 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 1.45%
- avg views Γ· 30,724 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 447
- 205 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.724%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 205
- of 429 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 129 of 205 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 429 (7 August 2026 β 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 91,585 |
| Reactions total | 482 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- β16,500
- Videos
- β1,240
- Links
- β289
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 25 September 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 06m
- Average length
- 1m 48s
Measured directly from 70 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
937 reactions across 244 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 435 | 46.4% | |
| π₯ | 67 | 7.15% | |
| β‘ | 55 | 5.87% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 53 | 5.66% | |
| π | 36 | 3.84% | |
| π | 34 | 3.63% | |
| πΏ | 28 | 2.99% | |
| π | 22 | 2.35% | |
| π | 17 | 1.81% | |
| π€ | 17 | 1.81% | |
| π | 16 | 1.71% | |
| π± | 16 | 1.71% | |
| π | 14 | 1.49% | |
| π | 13 | 1.39% | |
| π | 12 | 1.28% | |
| π | 10 | 1.07% | |
| π΄ | 10 | 1.07% | |
| π€― | 9 | 0.961% | |
| π | 8 | 0.854% | |
| π€© | 8 | 0.854% | |
| 13 further kinds | 57 | 6.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 259 of the 429 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 937 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 429 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#C671 BEZ ABZOR SOTAMIZ βΌοΈ M416 SUV 4 LVL π€© NARX : 199.000 uzs π° π@godzo_acc_mini π
β€1π₯1
#C670 DRUVAZN 4 LVLβΌοΈ TOP MIFIKLARβΌοΈ TOP JESTLARβΌοΈ TDM SETSβΌοΈ M416 YAROST 7 LVLβΌοΈ AKM 3 LVLβΌοΈ UMP 2 LVLβΌοΈ AKM 2 LVLβΌοΈ πNARX : 749.000 uzs @GODZO_ACC_MINI +998700250300
#N1373 β β #OTZIV - Akkaunt kanal nomidan sotildi! ishonchingiz uchun rahmat! πKanalimiz: @GODZO_MINI_SAVDO
#SOTILDI SOON OTVIZ β‘οΈ
#N1372 β β #OTZIV - Akkaunt kanal nomidan sotildi! ishonchingiz uchun rahmat! πKanalimiz: @GODZO_MINI_SAVDO
β€1π1
#SOTILDI SOON OTVIZ β‘οΈ
#C665 TOP MIFIKLARβΌοΈ TOP JESTLARβΌοΈ TDM SETSβΌοΈ M416 LEDNIK 6 LVLβΌοΈ M24 4 LVLβΌοΈ GROZA 4 LVLβΌοΈ DP 4 LVLβΌοΈ S12K 4 LVLβΌοΈ VECTOR 4 LVLβΌοΈ πNARX : SOTILDI @GODZO_ACC_MINI +998700250300
Sticker, posted without a caption
π7π6π1
#N1371 β β #OTZIV - Akkaunt kanal nomidan sotildi! ishonchingiz uchun rahmat! πKanalimiz: @GODZO_MINI_SAVDO
#SOTILDI SOON OTVIZ β‘οΈ
#C664 IGNIS 2 LVLβΌοΈ FENIKSTRA 1 LVLβΌοΈ TOP MIFIKLARβΌοΈ TOP JESTLARβΌοΈ TDM SETSβΌοΈ M416 LEDNIK 7 LVLβΌοΈ M24 4 LVLβΌοΈ M762 4 LVLβΌοΈ AKM 3 LVLβΌοΈ πNARX : SOTILDI @GODZO_ACC_MINI +998700250300
β€2π₯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 429 posts we hold for @GODZO_MINI_SAVDO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@GODZO_MINI_SAVDO edited 1 post after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 9 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@GODZO_SAVDO Β· 49,827140 postsGODZO OTVIZ π₯
@GODZO_OTVIZ Β· 14520 postsπππππ πππππΊπΏ
@GODZO_PUBG Β· 14,0705 postsMANARCHY CS
@manarchy_202 Β· 3,7912 postsAmirchik_pubg
@amirchik_pubg Β· 11 postVARIANT QOIDA
@GODZO_VARIANT Β· 4471 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ’πππ’ π ππ‘π π¦ππ©ππ’ πβ (@GODZO_MINI_SAVDO), 30,724 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GODZO_MINI_SAVDO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.