Channel
@GOLD_ws_WTI
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,273subscribers
+30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001345032856 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GOLD_ws_WTI |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GOLD_ws_WTI |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 4,273 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 4,271 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 4,274 | +7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 4,267 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 4,272 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 4,269 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 4,277 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 4,290 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 4,298 | +24 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 4,274 | +27 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:10 | 4,247 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 4,243 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 4,243 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
482 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 223 | 46.3% | |
| 🔥 | 165 | 34.2% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 5.39% | |
| ✍ | 19 | 3.94% | |
| 👌 | 15 | 3.11% | |
| 🆒 | 11 | 2.28% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 2.07% | |
| 🤓 | 5 | 1.04% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 0.622% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.622% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 0.415% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 611 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💰ИЗМЕНИ СВОЙ ДОХОД ПРЯМО СЕЙЧАС! Забудьте о дорогих фермах и счетах за свет, Начни арендовать облачные сервера, начните получать пассивный доход уже сегодня.(клик) Вам не нужно быть программистом. Мы берем на себя всё оборудование и обслуживание. Вы просто смотрите, как каждый час капает USDT. Это не магия, а работа современных дата-центров. Никаких скрытых комиссий, только прозрачные условия. Сверху скрин это вы…
#ng По евре и битку пока без изменений, видимо ждут новостей, уровни остались прежними, По газу подошли по нашему плану к поддержке, интересны покупки, при пробое незначительного сопротивления или после обновления вчерашнего лоя.
👍9
#es По снп500 накидал свои хотелки, но работать до новостей не буду, посмотрю что нарисуют после них.
👍9🔥2🆒2
#wti По нефти коррекция скорее всего будет глубже, накидал план, но работать буду крайне осторожно.
👍12🌚1
#gold По золоту наш план отработал. Сегодня первая пятница месяца, а значит вечером безработица в США, планы делать нет смысла но своими "хотелками" поделюсь. Незначительные поддержки оставлю там же, основную выставлю в районе 4120
👍17🌚2
#wti По нефти и остальным инструментам планы не поменялись, не буду засорять эфир бестолковыми скринами, планы те же.
👍15✍9⚡2
#gold По золоту прошёл пробой нашего сопротивления. На сегодня выставил область незначительной поддержки, буду искать покупки.
👌15🔥6✍5👍2🆒1
#gold Золото аккуратно продал еще раз, закрыл первый ТП, жду второй. День удался, реакций накидаем 🔥?
🔥39👍14🤓5❤2😡2
#ng Евра встала, пока без изменений. Газ продублирую, вторая попытка подхода к основной поддержке.
👍18❤6✍1
#btc По битку чуть подкорректировал незначительную зону поддержки, а так все без изменений.
👍13❤7✍1
#es По снп500 прошел пробой сопротивления, как мы и предполагали. Контрить я бы пока не советовал, рост может продолжится вплоть до 8К. Поддержку пока установлю в районе 7680.
👍18❤5✍1
#wti Нефть идет к нашему основной поддержке, сегодня жду продолжения снижения, установил зону сопротивления, аккуратно попробую там продать, на поддержке уже буду искать покупки.
👍27❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @GOLD_ws_WTI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Золото vs Нефть” (@GOLD_ws_WTI), 4,273 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GOLD_ws_WTI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.