Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,271–1,313 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 02:20
1,308
+7
9 Sept 2026, 04:00
1,301
+12
3 Sept 2026, 15:40
1,289
+13
31 Aug 2026, 07:04
1,276
no change
31 Aug 2026, 07:00
1,276
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.1%
avg views ÷ 1,308 subscribers
Avg views / post
263
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
20 (3 August 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
1,843
Reactions total
152
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
31 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
509 reactions across 20 posts, in 66 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 4.13% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5997033066986479236
21
4.13%
custom 6048362324220190619
18
3.54%
custom 5453906865832362685
15
2.95%
custom 5850264211891950364
15
2.95%
custom 6037488356084947008
14
2.75%
custom 5078203334599378532
13
2.55%
custom 5276036881237191553
13
2.55%
custom 5949311711130426975
13
2.55%
custom 5850309442192545477
12
2.36%
custom 5938542986873805181
12
2.36%
custom 6154355163533417402
12
2.36%
custom 5203923413969690715
11
2.16%
custom 5294191244140885845
11
2.16%
custom 5411156256016573323
11
2.16%
custom 5945085231382928418
11
2.16%
custom 5956495847091867062
11
2.16%
custom 5773719794368911860
10
1.96%
custom 5796558862785977372
10
1.96%
custom 5920343522518507188
10
1.96%
custom 5078060604246197743
9
1.77%
46 further kinds
257
50.5%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 509 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
•°•
لهلق ما بعرف إذا أنا متحمسة للرواية ، ولا بس بدي أعرف شو مخبيينلي لآخرها ..
بس أڪتر شي شدني فيها هو الجو تبعها 🌊
غموض ، أسرار ، أسئلة ، وأحداث بتحسسني طول الوقت إنو في شي أڪبر لسا ما انڪشف .. وڪل ما فڪرت إني فهمت شو عم يصير ، بتطلعلي شغلة جديدة بتخليني أرجع أحتار من أول وجديد 😭
ويمڪن هاد أڪتر شي مخليني مڪملة .. هالإحساس إنو لسا في شي مستنيني بالصفحات الجاية ، وأنا لازم أعرف شو هو ..
وعقبال ما ينزل الجزء السادس …
•°•
صارلي فترة غرقانة بـ « ملحمة البحور السبعة » 🌊📖
وبصراحة ، من أڪتر الأشياء اللي خلتني أتعلق بالسلسلة هي الشخصيات … لج ، تيراس ، بلشون ، ڪوفان وغيرهم ، حسّيت من البداية إنو بينهم شي مميز ، ڪيمياء و علاقات خلتني اتحمس أعرف أڪتر عنهم وعن شو رح يصير معهم ..
والمضحك إنو تقريبًا مع ڪل جزء ڪنت انصدم من الأحداث وأقول : « خلص ، مستحيل يصير شي أغرب من هيك » … وبفتح الجزء اللي بعده وبڪتشف إنو لأ ، في أغرب ✨
وهلق أنا بالج…
•°•
واعلمي – حفظكِ الله – أنَّ ما ڪان لله ،
لا يُؤخذ إليه بطريقٍ يُغضبه ؛
فأنتِ أڪرم من أن تُستنزفي في علاقةٍ يختلط فيها الوعد بالوهم ، والاهتمام بالتعلّق ، والمشاعر بما لا يرضي الله .
وأنقىٰ من أن تڪوني سرًّا في حياة أحد ، أو انتظارًا مؤجلًا لوعدٍ لا تعرفين له نهاية .
من أرادكِ بالحلال ، لم يترڪكِ معلّقة بين الرجاء والقلق ، ولم يطلب منكِ أن تتنازلي عن شيءٍ من دينكِ وحياءكِ ڪي يبقىٰ قريبًا .
بل يأتيكِ واضحًا ، مطم…
•°•
منذ غبت ،
وأنا أڪتشف أن بعض الغياب
لا يُنسىٰ …
إنما نتعلّم ڪيف نُخفي أثره
خلف هدوئنا ،
وخلف تلك الابتسامة التي لا تخبر أحداً
ڪم من الحنين يسڪن خلفها ،
ڪنتَ الشيء الذي
حين تضيق بي الدنيا ،
أجد عنده متّسعاً لقلبي ،
والآن صرتُ أبحث عن ذلك الأمان
في تفاصيل ڪثيرة …
لڪن لا شيء منها يشبهك ،
غريبٌ ڪيف يستطيع شخصٌ واحد
أن يترك في القلب
ڪل هذا الأثر ،
ثم يمضي وڪأن شيئاً لم يڪن ،
وڪأن الأيام التي جمعتنا
لم تڪن يوماً بهذا ا…
•°•
وقد تبكي لأسبابٍ أخرىٰ ،
لا علاقةَ لها بالفُقدان أو الخَيبات والخذلان!
تبكي ليس لأنّ قلبك يوجعك . .
بل لأنّ الأفكار في رأسك لا تتوقّف ،
لأنّك تفكّر في كلِّ شيء ،
ولأنّك تعبت من التّفكير!🌟
•°•
حتىٰ البڪاءُ
يحتاجُ منّي جُهدًا ، وأنا مُرهَقةٌ ،
مُرهَقةٌ جدًا ،
إلىٰ الحدِّ الذي لا أستطيعُ معه
حتىٰ أن أُقلِّبَ مواجعي
في رأسي ،
ولا أن أتركَ لدموعي
مساحةً لتُخفّفَ عنّي
ما أثقلَ قلبي 🌟 .
•°•
يا جابرَ ڪسرِ القلوبِ المنهڪة ، ومُؤنسَ الأرواحِ المستوحشة ، وعالمَ خفايا الصدورِ وما تُخفيه ، ومُدبّرَ أمرِ النفوسِ وما يُتعبها ؛ لا تدع قلبًا مثقلًا إلا خفّفتَ عنه ، ولا روحًا مڪلومةً إلا جبرتَها ، ولا نفسًا حائرةً إلا أرشدتَها ، ولا عينًا ساهرةً إلا أقررتَها ، ولا دعاءً صادقًا إلا بلغتَهُ من القبولِ غايتَه ..
اللهمّ طمأنينةً تُسڪنُ الاضطراب ، وبصيرةً تُبدّدُ الحيرة ، ويقينًا يُهوّنُ مشقّةَ الطريق ، وجبرًا يلي…
•°•
لستُ مجرد عابرة ،
أنا أثرٌ جميلٌ يبقىٰ ،
ابنةٌ يُفتخر بها ،
وقلبٌ يَسعد من حوله ،
صديقةٌ وقت الشدّة ،
وحضورٌ لا يُنسىٰ ،
أعرف معنىٰ الوفاء ،
وأحفظ الودّ مهما تغيّرت الأيام ،
أمنح من أحبّهم صدقي ،
وأترك خلفي دائمًا شيئًا جميلًا ،
لا أحتاج أن أُثبت من أنا ،
فأفعالي تتحدث عني ،
وطيبة قلبي تشهد لي ،
وڪل مڪانٍ أمرّ به
أحاول أن أترك فيه ذڪرىٰ تستحق البقاء ،
أنا ببساطة …
شخصٌ يحمل قلبًا صادقًا ،
ونوايا طيبة ،
وروحًا لا …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GRREEN2003. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“إخضرار الروح'” (@GRREEN2003), 1,308 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GRREEN2003.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
